Day 7 English Homework

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Extract A: The Joy of Travelling through Land

Research has shown that there are numerous benefits to travelling through land. A study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that individuals who took road trips reported higher levels of happiness and overall life satisfaction compared to those who flew to their destinations. The study attributed these findings to the sense of freedom and autonomy that comes with travelling through land, as well as the opportunities for exploration and discovery that it provides.

Additionally, travelling through land has been found to be beneficial for mental health. Individuals who commute by train reported lower levels of stress and anxiety compared to those who drove to work. The study suggested that this may be due to the ability to relax, read, or work during train commutes, as well as the reduced risk of accidents and traffic congestion.

Travelling through land also allows individuals to connect with their surroundings and appreciate the natural world. Individuals who took road trips reported feeling more connected to nature and more likely to engage in eco-friendly behaviours, such as recycling and conserving energy.

Travelling by car can be more cost-effective than flying, particularly for shorter distances or for groups of people. The study noted that road trips can also allow individuals to explore multiple destinations along the way, making it a more flexible and customisable travel option.

Overall, the benefits of travelling through land are numerous and well-documented. From increased happiness and lower stress levels to cost savings and eco-friendliness, there are compelling reasons to consider road trips or train journeys for your next travel adventure. So, take the scenic route and enjoy the journey – you may be pleasantly surprised by what you discover along the way.

Extract B: The Sky’s the Limit 

Travelling through air has become the most popular mode of transportation, and for good reason. From convenience to speed, there are numerous benefits to flying that make it the best option for many travellers.

One of the primary advantages of travelling through air is speed. A study published in the Journal of Air Transport Management found that air travel is significantly faster than other modes of transportation, such as cars or trains. For example, a flight from New York City to Los Angeles takes approximately six hours, while driving the same distance would take more than two days. This speed is particularly beneficial for business travellers or those with limited vacation time, as it allows them to maximise their time at their destination.

In addition to speed, air travel also offers convenience and accessibility. Air travel is more accessible than other modes of transportation, particularly for long-distance travel or travel to remote destinations. The study noted that airports are often located near major cities and are connected to public transportation networks, making them easily accessible to travellers.

Another benefit of air travel is safety. Despite occasional high-profile incidents, air travel is statistically much safer than other modes of transportation. Air travel has a much lower risk of accidents and fatalities compared to driving or riding a motorcycle. Furthermore, air travel has become increasingly eco-friendly in recent years. 

Transport and Environment found that air travel has become more fuel-efficient and emits fewer greenhouse gases per passenger than it did in previous decades. Additionally, many airlines have implemented sustainability measures, such as using biofuels or reducing waste on flights.

Lastly, air travel offers numerous amenities that make it a comfortable and enjoyable experience. From in-flight entertainment to comfortable seating and quality food, airlines strive to make their passengers’ travel experience as pleasant as possible.

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

1. What information do each extract have that the other does not? 

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Extract A: The Joy of Travelling through Land

Research has shown that there are numerous benefits to travelling through land. A study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that individuals who took road trips reported higher levels of happiness and overall life satisfaction compared to those who flew to their destinations. The study attributed these findings to the sense of freedom and autonomy that comes with travelling through land, as well as the opportunities for exploration and discovery that it provides.

Additionally, travelling through land has been found to be beneficial for mental health. Individuals who commute by train reported lower levels of stress and anxiety compared to those who drove to work. The study suggested that this may be due to the ability to relax, read, or work during train commutes, as well as the reduced risk of accidents and traffic congestion.

Travelling through land also allows individuals to connect with their surroundings and appreciate the natural world. Individuals who took road trips reported feeling more connected to nature and more likely to engage in eco-friendly behaviours, such as recycling and conserving energy.

Travelling by car can be more cost-effective than flying, particularly for shorter distances or for groups of people. The study noted that road trips can also allow individuals to explore multiple destinations along the way, making it a more flexible and customisable travel option.

Overall, the benefits of travelling through land are numerous and well-documented. From increased happiness and lower stress levels to cost savings and eco-friendliness, there are compelling reasons to consider road trips or train journeys for your next travel adventure. So, take the scenic route and enjoy the journey – you may be pleasantly surprised by what you discover along the way.

Extract B: The Sky’s the Limit 

Travelling through air has become the most popular mode of transportation, and for good reason. From convenience to speed, there are numerous benefits to flying that make it the best option for many travellers.

One of the primary advantages of travelling through air is speed. A study published in the Journal of Air Transport Management found that air travel is significantly faster than other modes of transportation, such as cars or trains. For example, a flight from New York City to Los Angeles takes approximately six hours, while driving the same distance would take more than two days. This speed is particularly beneficial for business travellers or those with limited vacation time, as it allows them to maximise their time at their destination.

In addition to speed, air travel also offers convenience and accessibility. Air travel is more accessible than other modes of transportation, particularly for long-distance travel or travel to remote destinations. The study noted that airports are often located near major cities and are connected to public transportation networks, making them easily accessible to travellers.

Another benefit of air travel is safety. Despite occasional high-profile incidents, air travel is statistically much safer than other modes of transportation. Air travel has a much lower risk of accidents and fatalities compared to driving or riding a motorcycle. Furthermore, air travel has become increasingly eco-friendly in recent years. 

Transport and Environment found that air travel has become more fuel-efficient and emits fewer greenhouse gases per passenger than it did in previous decades. Additionally, many airlines have implemented sustainability measures, such as using biofuels or reducing waste on flights.

Lastly, air travel offers numerous amenities that make it a comfortable and enjoyable experience. From in-flight entertainment to comfortable seating and quality food, airlines strive to make their passengers’ travel experience as pleasant as possible.

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

2. What is the theme of both extracts?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Extract A: The Joy of Travelling through Land

Research has shown that there are numerous benefits to travelling through land. A study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that individuals who took road trips reported higher levels of happiness and overall life satisfaction compared to those who flew to their destinations. The study attributed these findings to the sense of freedom and autonomy that comes with travelling through land, as well as the opportunities for exploration and discovery that it provides.

Additionally, travelling through land has been found to be beneficial for mental health. Individuals who commute by train reported lower levels of stress and anxiety compared to those who drove to work. The study suggested that this may be due to the ability to relax, read, or work during train commutes, as well as the reduced risk of accidents and traffic congestion.

Travelling through land also allows individuals to connect with their surroundings and appreciate the natural world. Individuals who took road trips reported feeling more connected to nature and more likely to engage in eco-friendly behaviours, such as recycling and conserving energy.

Travelling by car can be more cost-effective than flying, particularly for shorter distances or for groups of people. The study noted that road trips can also allow individuals to explore multiple destinations along the way, making it a more flexible and customisable travel option.

Overall, the benefits of travelling through land are numerous and well-documented. From increased happiness and lower stress levels to cost savings and eco-friendliness, there are compelling reasons to consider road trips or train journeys for your next travel adventure. So, take the scenic route and enjoy the journey – you may be pleasantly surprised by what you discover along the way.

Extract B: The Sky’s the Limit 

Travelling through air has become the most popular mode of transportation, and for good reason. From convenience to speed, there are numerous benefits to flying that make it the best option for many travellers.

One of the primary advantages of travelling through air is speed. A study published in the Journal of Air Transport Management found that air travel is significantly faster than other modes of transportation, such as cars or trains. For example, a flight from New York City to Los Angeles takes approximately six hours, while driving the same distance would take more than two days. This speed is particularly beneficial for business travellers or those with limited vacation time, as it allows them to maximise their time at their destination.

In addition to speed, air travel also offers convenience and accessibility. Air travel is more accessible than other modes of transportation, particularly for long-distance travel or travel to remote destinations. The study noted that airports are often located near major cities and are connected to public transportation networks, making them easily accessible to travellers.

Another benefit of air travel is safety. Despite occasional high-profile incidents, air travel is statistically much safer than other modes of transportation. Air travel has a much lower risk of accidents and fatalities compared to driving or riding a motorcycle. Furthermore, air travel has become increasingly eco-friendly in recent years. 

Transport and Environment found that air travel has become more fuel-efficient and emits fewer greenhouse gases per passenger than it did in previous decades. Additionally, many airlines have implemented sustainability measures, such as using biofuels or reducing waste on flights.

Lastly, air travel offers numerous amenities that make it a comfortable and enjoyable experience. From in-flight entertainment to comfortable seating and quality food, airlines strive to make their passengers’ travel experience as pleasant as possible.

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

3. What practical advantages do land travel and air travel offer, according to the two extracts?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Extract A: The Joy of Travelling through Land

Research has shown that there are numerous benefits to travelling through land. A study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that individuals who took road trips reported higher levels of happiness and overall life satisfaction compared to those who flew to their destinations. The study attributed these findings to the sense of freedom and autonomy that comes with travelling through land, as well as the opportunities for exploration and discovery that it provides.

Additionally, travelling through land has been found to be beneficial for mental health. Individuals who commute by train reported lower levels of stress and anxiety compared to those who drove to work. The study suggested that this may be due to the ability to relax, read, or work during train commutes, as well as the reduced risk of accidents and traffic congestion.

Travelling through land also allows individuals to connect with their surroundings and appreciate the natural world. Individuals who took road trips reported feeling more connected to nature and more likely to engage in eco-friendly behaviours, such as recycling and conserving energy.

Travelling by car can be more cost-effective than flying, particularly for shorter distances or for groups of people. The study noted that road trips can also allow individuals to explore multiple destinations along the way, making it a more flexible and customisable travel option.

Overall, the benefits of travelling through land are numerous and well-documented. From increased happiness and lower stress levels to cost savings and eco-friendliness, there are compelling reasons to consider road trips or train journeys for your next travel adventure. So, take the scenic route and enjoy the journey – you may be pleasantly surprised by what you discover along the way.

Extract B: The Sky’s the Limit 

Travelling through air has become the most popular mode of transportation, and for good reason. From convenience to speed, there are numerous benefits to flying that make it the best option for many travellers.

One of the primary advantages of travelling through air is speed. A study published in the Journal of Air Transport Management found that air travel is significantly faster than other modes of transportation, such as cars or trains. For example, a flight from New York City to Los Angeles takes approximately six hours, while driving the same distance would take more than two days. This speed is particularly beneficial for business travellers or those with limited vacation time, as it allows them to maximise their time at their destination.

In addition to speed, air travel also offers convenience and accessibility. Air travel is more accessible than other modes of transportation, particularly for long-distance travel or travel to remote destinations. The study noted that airports are often located near major cities and are connected to public transportation networks, making them easily accessible to travellers.

Another benefit of air travel is safety. Despite occasional high-profile incidents, air travel is statistically much safer than other modes of transportation. Air travel has a much lower risk of accidents and fatalities compared to driving or riding a motorcycle. Furthermore, air travel has become increasingly eco-friendly in recent years. 

Transport and Environment found that air travel has become more fuel-efficient and emits fewer greenhouse gases per passenger than it did in previous decades. Additionally, many airlines have implemented sustainability measures, such as using biofuels or reducing waste on flights.

Lastly, air travel offers numerous amenities that make it a comfortable and enjoyable experience. From in-flight entertainment to comfortable seating and quality food, airlines strive to make their passengers’ travel experience as pleasant as possible.

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

4. How are the extracts comparable in terms of eco-friendliness?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Extract A: The Joy of Travelling through Land

Research has shown that there are numerous benefits to travelling through land. A study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that individuals who took road trips reported higher levels of happiness and overall life satisfaction compared to those who flew to their destinations. The study attributed these findings to the sense of freedom and autonomy that comes with travelling through land, as well as the opportunities for exploration and discovery that it provides.

Additionally, travelling through land has been found to be beneficial for mental health. Individuals who commute by train reported lower levels of stress and anxiety compared to those who drove to work. The study suggested that this may be due to the ability to relax, read, or work during train commutes, as well as the reduced risk of accidents and traffic congestion.

Travelling through land also allows individuals to connect with their surroundings and appreciate the natural world. Individuals who took road trips reported feeling more connected to nature and more likely to engage in eco-friendly behaviours, such as recycling and conserving energy.

Travelling by car can be more cost-effective than flying, particularly for shorter distances or for groups of people. The study noted that road trips can also allow individuals to explore multiple destinations along the way, making it a more flexible and customisable travel option.

Overall, the benefits of travelling through land are numerous and well-documented. From increased happiness and lower stress levels to cost savings and eco-friendliness, there are compelling reasons to consider road trips or train journeys for your next travel adventure. So, take the scenic route and enjoy the journey – you may be pleasantly surprised by what you discover along the way.

Extract B: The Sky’s the Limit 

Travelling through air has become the most popular mode of transportation, and for good reason. From convenience to speed, there are numerous benefits to flying that make it the best option for many travellers.

One of the primary advantages of travelling through air is speed. A study published in the Journal of Air Transport Management found that air travel is significantly faster than other modes of transportation, such as cars or trains. For example, a flight from New York City to Los Angeles takes approximately six hours, while driving the same distance would take more than two days. This speed is particularly beneficial for business travellers or those with limited vacation time, as it allows them to maximise their time at their destination.

In addition to speed, air travel also offers convenience and accessibility. Air travel is more accessible than other modes of transportation, particularly for long-distance travel or travel to remote destinations. The study noted that airports are often located near major cities and are connected to public transportation networks, making them easily accessible to travellers.

Another benefit of air travel is safety. Despite occasional high-profile incidents, air travel is statistically much safer than other modes of transportation. Air travel has a much lower risk of accidents and fatalities compared to driving or riding a motorcycle. Furthermore, air travel has become increasingly eco-friendly in recent years. 

Transport and Environment found that air travel has become more fuel-efficient and emits fewer greenhouse gases per passenger than it did in previous decades. Additionally, many airlines have implemented sustainability measures, such as using biofuels or reducing waste on flights.

Lastly, air travel offers numerous amenities that make it a comfortable and enjoyable experience. From in-flight entertainment to comfortable seating and quality food, airlines strive to make their passengers’ travel experience as pleasant as possible.

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

5. Which is NOT a given fact in the extracts?

Read the poem below then answer the questions that follow.

Emblems Of Friendship by John Imrie

Friendship is a golden band

Linking life with life,

Heart to heart, and hand to hand,

Antidote to strife.

Friendship is a silken cord 5

Beautiful and strong,

Guarding, by each kindly word,

Loving hearts from wrong.

Friendship is a beacon-light

On life’s rocky shore, 10

Brightest in our darkest night

When the breakers roar.

Friendship is an iron shield

Where life’s cruel darts

Ever may be forced to yield 15

Ere they wound true hearts.

Friendship is the gift of God

Freely to us given,

As the flowers that gem the sod,

Or the light of heaven! 20

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer. 

6. What is the significance of the poem’s title, “Emblems of Friendship”?

Read the poem below then answer the questions that follow.

Emblems Of Friendship by John Imrie

Friendship is a golden band

Linking life with life,

Heart to heart, and hand to hand,

Antidote to strife.

Friendship is a silken cord 5

Beautiful and strong,

Guarding, by each kindly word,

Loving hearts from wrong.

Friendship is a beacon-light

On life’s rocky shore, 10

Brightest in our darkest night

When the breakers roar.

Friendship is an iron shield

Where life’s cruel darts

Ever may be forced to yield 15

Ere they wound true hearts.

Friendship is the gift of God

Freely to us given,

As the flowers that gem the sod,

Or the light of heaven! 20

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer. 

7. What is the speaker’s attitude towards friendship?

Read the poem below then answer the questions that follow.

Emblems Of Friendship by John Imrie

Friendship is a golden band

Linking life with life,

Heart to heart, and hand to hand,

Antidote to strife.

Friendship is a silken cord 5

Beautiful and strong,

Guarding, by each kindly word,

Loving hearts from wrong.

Friendship is a beacon-light

On life’s rocky shore, 10

Brightest in our darkest night

When the breakers roar.

Friendship is an iron shield

Where life’s cruel darts

Ever may be forced to yield 15

Ere they wound true hearts.

Friendship is the gift of God

Freely to us given,

As the flowers that gem the sod,

Or the light of heaven! 20

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer. 

8. What does the fourth stanza mean?

Read the poem below then answer the questions that follow.

Emblems Of Friendship by John Imrie

Friendship is a golden band

Linking life with life,

Heart to heart, and hand to hand,

Antidote to strife.

Friendship is a silken cord 5

Beautiful and strong,

Guarding, by each kindly word,

Loving hearts from wrong.

Friendship is a beacon-light

On life’s rocky shore, 10

Brightest in our darkest night

When the breakers roar.

Friendship is an iron shield

Where life’s cruel darts

Ever may be forced to yield 15

Ere they wound true hearts.

Friendship is the gift of God

Freely to us given,

As the flowers that gem the sod,

Or the light of heaven! 20

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer. 

9. What words can you associate with the poem?

Read the poem below then answer the questions that follow.

Emblems Of Friendship by John Imrie

Friendship is a golden band

Linking life with life,

Heart to heart, and hand to hand,

Antidote to strife.

Friendship is a silken cord 5

Beautiful and strong,

Guarding, by each kindly word,

Loving hearts from wrong.

Friendship is a beacon-light

On life’s rocky shore, 10

Brightest in our darkest night

When the breakers roar.

Friendship is an iron shield

Where life’s cruel darts

Ever may be forced to yield 15

Ere they wound true hearts.

Friendship is the gift of God

Freely to us given,

As the flowers that gem the sod,

Or the light of heaven! 20

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer. 

10. What does lines 1-3 mean?

Read the article below then answer the questions.  

There are sentences that have been removed from the article. Choose the correct letter below that contains the sentence that best fits in the paragraph. Take note that there is an extra sentence which you do not need to use.

The Incredible True Story of Disney’s Oswald the Lucky Rabbit

Oswald the Lucky Rabbit first appeared in the animated short “Trolly Troubles” on September 5, 1927. The short, which is a little over six minutes long, was made by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. They chose a rabbit because there were so many animated cats on the market at the time. 11……………… Inadvertently, Oswald led to the creation of many notable Disney characters, and years later, the character became part of the strangest “trade” in the history of modern entertainment, only to be forgotten about again. 

Critics and audiences liked Oswald almost right away. 12…………… The success of the Oswald shorts allowed Walt and his brother and business partner named Roy to hire more animators. But while Walt, Roy, and Ub were happy about their success, chaos was building behind the scenes. 

Early in 1928, Mintz got tired of Walt’s demands and realised how talented he was, so he started talking to other people about making more Oswald shorts without Walt. George Winkler, who was also a producer on the shorts, started talking to some of Walt’s artists about joining the new venture. Iwerks, however, wouldn’t give in. Walt went to New York to renegotiate his contract while Mintz was signing another deal with Universal for more Oswald shorts. Walt didn’t know about Mintz’s trickery, or maybe he just didn’t care. Mintz didn’t give Walt a raise. 13……………… Walt scrambled to figure out what was going on, frantically telegraphing Roy but staying positive overall. Even after he found out that many of his animators had been hired by Universal instead of him, he worked to make a separate deal with Universal to avoid Mintz. The character Walt made for the studio would not belong to him. What’s more Universal suggested, as a way of salvaging things, for Mintz to take over the studio from Walt. It was the last thing she could take. 14……………

Legend has it that he thought of Mickey Mouse on the train ride back to New York. This is likely not true. 15……………. And Universal would keep making Oswald shorts until the end of the 1930s. By then, he had been in almost 200 shorts. By the time Universal was done with him he would be indistinguishable from the character that Walt and Ub had created – he was in full colour and he looked weirdly realistic, in a sugary cereal salesman way.

Choose the letter of the correct sentence that best fits the missing lines in each paragraph.

Read the article below then answer the questions.  

There are sentences that have been removed from the article. Choose the correct letter below that contains the sentence that best fits in the paragraph. Take note that there is an extra sentence which you do not need to use.

The Incredible True Story of Disney’s Oswald the Lucky Rabbit

Oswald the Lucky Rabbit first appeared in the animated short “Trolly Troubles” on September 5, 1927. The short, which is a little over six minutes long, was made by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. They chose a rabbit because there were so many animated cats on the market at the time. 11……………… Inadvertently, Oswald led to the creation of many notable Disney characters, and years later, the character became part of the strangest “trade” in the history of modern entertainment, only to be forgotten about again. 

Critics and audiences liked Oswald almost right away. 12…………… The success of the Oswald shorts allowed Walt and his brother and business partner named Roy to hire more animators. But while Walt, Roy, and Ub were happy about their success, chaos was building behind the scenes. 

Early in 1928, Mintz got tired of Walt’s demands and realised how talented he was, so he started talking to other people about making more Oswald shorts without Walt. George Winkler, who was also a producer on the shorts, started talking to some of Walt’s artists about joining the new venture. Iwerks, however, wouldn’t give in. Walt went to New York to renegotiate his contract while Mintz was signing another deal with Universal for more Oswald shorts. Walt didn’t know about Mintz’s trickery, or maybe he just didn’t care. Mintz didn’t give Walt a raise. 13……………… Walt scrambled to figure out what was going on, frantically telegraphing Roy but staying positive overall. Even after he found out that many of his animators had been hired by Universal instead of him, he worked to make a separate deal with Universal to avoid Mintz. The character Walt made for the studio would not belong to him. What’s more Universal suggested, as a way of salvaging things, for Mintz to take over the studio from Walt. It was the last thing she could take. 14……………

Legend has it that he thought of Mickey Mouse on the train ride back to New York. This is likely not true. 15……………. And Universal would keep making Oswald shorts until the end of the 1930s. By then, he had been in almost 200 shorts. By the time Universal was done with him he would be indistinguishable from the character that Walt and Ub had created – he was in full colour and he looked weirdly realistic, in a sugary cereal salesman way.

Choose the letter of the correct sentence that best fits the missing lines in each paragraph.

Read the article below then answer the questions.  

There are sentences that have been removed from the article. Choose the correct letter below that contains the sentence that best fits in the paragraph. Take note that there is an extra sentence which you do not need to use.

The Incredible True Story of Disney’s Oswald the Lucky Rabbit

Oswald the Lucky Rabbit first appeared in the animated short “Trolly Troubles” on September 5, 1927. The short, which is a little over six minutes long, was made by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. They chose a rabbit because there were so many animated cats on the market at the time. 11……………… Inadvertently, Oswald led to the creation of many notable Disney characters, and years later, the character became part of the strangest “trade” in the history of modern entertainment, only to be forgotten about again. 

Critics and audiences liked Oswald almost right away. 12…………… The success of the Oswald shorts allowed Walt and his brother and business partner named Roy to hire more animators. But while Walt, Roy, and Ub were happy about their success, chaos was building behind the scenes. 

Early in 1928, Mintz got tired of Walt’s demands and realised how talented he was, so he started talking to other people about making more Oswald shorts without Walt. George Winkler, who was also a producer on the shorts, started talking to some of Walt’s artists about joining the new venture. Iwerks, however, wouldn’t give in. Walt went to New York to renegotiate his contract while Mintz was signing another deal with Universal for more Oswald shorts. Walt didn’t know about Mintz’s trickery, or maybe he just didn’t care. Mintz didn’t give Walt a raise. 13……………… Walt scrambled to figure out what was going on, frantically telegraphing Roy but staying positive overall. Even after he found out that many of his animators had been hired by Universal instead of him, he worked to make a separate deal with Universal to avoid Mintz. The character Walt made for the studio would not belong to him. What’s more Universal suggested, as a way of salvaging things, for Mintz to take over the studio from Walt. It was the last thing she could take. 14……………

Legend has it that he thought of Mickey Mouse on the train ride back to New York. This is likely not true. 15……………. And Universal would keep making Oswald shorts until the end of the 1930s. By then, he had been in almost 200 shorts. By the time Universal was done with him he would be indistinguishable from the character that Walt and Ub had created – he was in full colour and he looked weirdly realistic, in a sugary cereal salesman way.

Choose the letter of the correct sentence that best fits the missing lines in each paragraph.

Read the article below then answer the questions.  

There are sentences that have been removed from the article. Choose the correct letter below that contains the sentence that best fits in the paragraph. Take note that there is an extra sentence which you do not need to use.

The Incredible True Story of Disney’s Oswald the Lucky Rabbit

Oswald the Lucky Rabbit first appeared in the animated short “Trolly Troubles” on September 5, 1927. The short, which is a little over six minutes long, was made by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. They chose a rabbit because there were so many animated cats on the market at the time. 11……………… Inadvertently, Oswald led to the creation of many notable Disney characters, and years later, the character became part of the strangest “trade” in the history of modern entertainment, only to be forgotten about again. 

Critics and audiences liked Oswald almost right away. 12…………… The success of the Oswald shorts allowed Walt and his brother and business partner named Roy to hire more animators. But while Walt, Roy, and Ub were happy about their success, chaos was building behind the scenes. 

Early in 1928, Mintz got tired of Walt’s demands and realised how talented he was, so he started talking to other people about making more Oswald shorts without Walt. George Winkler, who was also a producer on the shorts, started talking to some of Walt’s artists about joining the new venture. Iwerks, however, wouldn’t give in. Walt went to New York to renegotiate his contract while Mintz was signing another deal with Universal for more Oswald shorts. Walt didn’t know about Mintz’s trickery, or maybe he just didn’t care. Mintz didn’t give Walt a raise. 13……………… Walt scrambled to figure out what was going on, frantically telegraphing Roy but staying positive overall. Even after he found out that many of his animators had been hired by Universal instead of him, he worked to make a separate deal with Universal to avoid Mintz. The character Walt made for the studio would not belong to him. What’s more Universal suggested, as a way of salvaging things, for Mintz to take over the studio from Walt. It was the last thing she could take. 14……………

Legend has it that he thought of Mickey Mouse on the train ride back to New York. This is likely not true. 15……………. And Universal would keep making Oswald shorts until the end of the 1930s. By then, he had been in almost 200 shorts. By the time Universal was done with him he would be indistinguishable from the character that Walt and Ub had created – he was in full colour and he looked weirdly realistic, in a sugary cereal salesman way.

Choose the letter of the correct sentence that best fits the missing lines in each paragraph.

Read the article below then answer the questions.  

There are sentences that have been removed from the article. Choose the correct letter below that contains the sentence that best fits in the paragraph. Take note that there is an extra sentence which you do not need to use.

The Incredible True Story of Disney’s Oswald the Lucky Rabbit

Oswald the Lucky Rabbit first appeared in the animated short “Trolly Troubles” on September 5, 1927. The short, which is a little over six minutes long, was made by Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. They chose a rabbit because there were so many animated cats on the market at the time. 11……………… Inadvertently, Oswald led to the creation of many notable Disney characters, and years later, the character became part of the strangest “trade” in the history of modern entertainment, only to be forgotten about again. 

Critics and audiences liked Oswald almost right away. 12…………… The success of the Oswald shorts allowed Walt and his brother and business partner named Roy to hire more animators. But while Walt, Roy, and Ub were happy about their success, chaos was building behind the scenes. 

Early in 1928, Mintz got tired of Walt’s demands and realised how talented he was, so he started talking to other people about making more Oswald shorts without Walt. George Winkler, who was also a producer on the shorts, started talking to some of Walt’s artists about joining the new venture. Iwerks, however, wouldn’t give in. Walt went to New York to renegotiate his contract while Mintz was signing another deal with Universal for more Oswald shorts. Walt didn’t know about Mintz’s trickery, or maybe he just didn’t care. Mintz didn’t give Walt a raise. 13……………… Walt scrambled to figure out what was going on, frantically telegraphing Roy but staying positive overall. Even after he found out that many of his animators had been hired by Universal instead of him, he worked to make a separate deal with Universal to avoid Mintz. The character Walt made for the studio would not belong to him. What’s more Universal suggested, as a way of salvaging things, for Mintz to take over the studio from Walt. It was the last thing she could take. 14……………

Legend has it that he thought of Mickey Mouse on the train ride back to New York. This is likely not true. 15……………. And Universal would keep making Oswald shorts until the end of the 1930s. By then, he had been in almost 200 shorts. By the time Universal was done with him he would be indistinguishable from the character that Walt and Ub had created – he was in full colour and he looked weirdly realistic, in a sugary cereal salesman way.

Choose the letter of the correct sentence that best fits the missing lines in each paragraph.

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Answer the following questions by choosing the correct letter that matches the description. Take note that the letters can be repeated accordingly.

Which extract mentions about…

16. a recently recognised basic taste that is characterised by a flavorful, soupy sensory experience?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Answer the following questions by choosing the correct letter that matches the description. Take note that the letters can be repeated accordingly.

Which extract mentions about…

17. a basic taste that is typically linked with fruits and desserts and has a pleasant and luscious taste?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Answer the following questions by choosing the correct letter that matches the description. Take note that the letters can be repeated accordingly.

Which extract mentions about…

18. a basic taste that can occasionally be regarded as undesirable yet has advantageous effects on people’s metabolism?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Answer the following questions by choosing the correct letter that matches the description. Take note that the letters can be repeated accordingly.

Which extract mentions about…

19. a basic taste that consists of certain ions and is essential in a nutritious meal as it is needed for proper bodily functions?

Read the extracts below then answer the questions that follow.

Answer the following questions by choosing the correct letter that matches the description. Take note that the letters can be repeated accordingly.

Which extract mentions about…

20. a basic taste that can pave the way to teeth difficulties and deterioration but can have beneficial effects such as food preservation?

Read the article below then answer the questions that follow.

Beware Creeping Biophobia

Growing up in Japan, Masashi Soga enjoyed spending time outdoors catching insects and collecting flora. His parents were not outdoor enthusiasts, but his elementary school teacher was. Soga recalls, “They showed me how to collect and prepare specimens of butterflies. I appreciated nature quite a lot.” This early exposure fostered Soga’s appreciation for nature and he is now an ecologist at the University of Tokyo. Soga focuses on the mental health advantages of nature. His findings contribute to the expanding body of scientific literature demonstrating that spending time outside has a favourable influence on people’s health.

In Soga’s speciality, research on biophilia, which investigates the repercussions of humans’ affinity for the natural world, is significantly more comprehensive than the study on biophobia, the dread of nature. In contrast, Soga and a team of academics claim in a recent position paper that biophobia is a rising phenomenon that appears to be increasing alongside urbanisation. They suggest that biophobia is being reinforced and propagated throughout society in a vicious cycle, which can have detrimental effects on people’s health. Current research indicates that biophobic individuals are less inclined to support conservation initiatives, implying that increasing biophobia is also detrimental to wild environments.

To prevent or perhaps eradicate biophobia, it is necessary to comprehend its origins. The vicious cycle of biophobia proposed by the researchers is predicated on the notion that humans prefer to fear and avoid suffering. Reactions such as disgust can also result in avoidance behaviour. According to Soga and his colleagues, biophobia develops when an individual begins to perceive nature as something to be avoided, whether as a result of direct experience, family, friends, or the media. Over time, this may encourage someone to avoid nature more and more, or even want to eradicate it. Increasingly rare interactions with nature can result in a sense of isolation. And because individuals generally fear the unknown, this might exacerbate the phobia.

The ramifications of even a single person’s phobia are concerning, according to the experts. If a human lacks the expertise to interact with wildlife in a safe manner or never learns to differentiate between approachable and possibly hazardous species, they become ignorant of the natural world and must avoid it. This ignorance frequently leads to the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts. As a result, biophobia increases at the societal level and fewer individuals interact with nature. And because individuals are reluctant to safeguard something they fear, the outcome is a cycle of environmental degradation.

According to the study, education is vital for breaking the pattern. Several studies indicate that early exposure to nature in a safe environment, such as with a schoolteacher or parent, has a significant effect on children’s perspectives. Soga asserts that children are profoundly influenced by their parents’ actions. Outside of school, educational outreach initiatives in museums and parks can enhance people’s understanding of nature. Walks led by a naturalist or hobbies such as gardening might facilitate firsthand pleasant contacts. Soga says virtual reality can play a role in locations where access to nature is difficult.

As cities become larger and denser, access to green space will become increasingly difficult for many, particularly those living in low-income communities, says Linda Powers Tomasso, an environmental health researcher specialising in human-nature interactions. She adds that people’s attention spans, physical activity levels, and stress resistance are being badly impacted by the loss of everyday contact with the environment, not to mention the spiritual benefits of connecting with something larger than oneself.

While Powers Tomasso “entirely agrees” with the researchers’ ideas, she notes that there is another attitude between biophilia and biophobia that leads to the same outcomes as biophobia: apathy. She says, “If you don’t care about something, you won’t take the next step to safeguard it.” She explains that this is why education, nature mentorship, and making natural and urban green spaces pleasant and accessible are so crucial for conservation and human well-being. Tomasso states, “We only safeguard and care for what we know and love. If we never have the chance to get to know something, we will never build a passion for it.”

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

21. According to the article, how does biophobia develop, and what are some of the factors that contribute to it?

Read the article below then answer the questions that follow.

Beware Creeping Biophobia

Growing up in Japan, Masashi Soga enjoyed spending time outdoors catching insects and collecting flora. His parents were not outdoor enthusiasts, but his elementary school teacher was. Soga recalls, “They showed me how to collect and prepare specimens of butterflies. I appreciated nature quite a lot.” This early exposure fostered Soga’s appreciation for nature and he is now an ecologist at the University of Tokyo. Soga focuses on the mental health advantages of nature. His findings contribute to the expanding body of scientific literature demonstrating that spending time outside has a favourable influence on people’s health.

In Soga’s speciality, research on biophilia, which investigates the repercussions of humans’ affinity for the natural world, is significantly more comprehensive than the study on biophobia, the dread of nature. In contrast, Soga and a team of academics claim in a recent position paper that biophobia is a rising phenomenon that appears to be increasing alongside urbanisation. They suggest that biophobia is being reinforced and propagated throughout society in a vicious cycle, which can have detrimental effects on people’s health. Current research indicates that biophobic individuals are less inclined to support conservation initiatives, implying that increasing biophobia is also detrimental to wild environments.

To prevent or perhaps eradicate biophobia, it is necessary to comprehend its origins. The vicious cycle of biophobia proposed by the researchers is predicated on the notion that humans prefer to fear and avoid suffering. Reactions such as disgust can also result in avoidance behaviour. According to Soga and his colleagues, biophobia develops when an individual begins to perceive nature as something to be avoided, whether as a result of direct experience, family, friends, or the media. Over time, this may encourage someone to avoid nature more and more, or even want to eradicate it. Increasingly rare interactions with nature can result in a sense of isolation. And because individuals generally fear the unknown, this might exacerbate the phobia.

The ramifications of even a single person’s phobia are concerning, according to the experts. If a human lacks the expertise to interact with wildlife in a safe manner or never learns to differentiate between approachable and possibly hazardous species, they become ignorant of the natural world and must avoid it. This ignorance frequently leads to the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts. As a result, biophobia increases at the societal level and fewer individuals interact with nature. And because individuals are reluctant to safeguard something they fear, the outcome is a cycle of environmental degradation.

According to the study, education is vital for breaking the pattern. Several studies indicate that early exposure to nature in a safe environment, such as with a schoolteacher or parent, has a significant effect on children’s perspectives. Soga asserts that children are profoundly influenced by their parents’ actions. Outside of school, educational outreach initiatives in museums and parks can enhance people’s understanding of nature. Walks led by a naturalist or hobbies such as gardening might facilitate firsthand pleasant contacts. Soga says virtual reality can play a role in locations where access to nature is difficult.

As cities become larger and denser, access to green space will become increasingly difficult for many, particularly those living in low-income communities, says Linda Powers Tomasso, an environmental health researcher specialising in human-nature interactions. She adds that people’s attention spans, physical activity levels, and stress resistance are being badly impacted by the loss of everyday contact with the environment, not to mention the spiritual benefits of connecting with something larger than oneself.

While Powers Tomasso “entirely agrees” with the researchers’ ideas, she notes that there is another attitude between biophilia and biophobia that leads to the same outcomes as biophobia: apathy. She says, “If you don’t care about something, you won’t take the next step to safeguard it.” She explains that this is why education, nature mentorship, and making natural and urban green spaces pleasant and accessible are so crucial for conservation and human well-being. Tomasso states, “We only safeguard and care for what we know and love. If we never have the chance to get to know something, we will never build a passion for it.”

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

22. Based on the article, which of the following best describes the vicious cycle proposed by the researchers regarding biophobia?

Read the article below then answer the questions that follow.

Beware Creeping Biophobia

Growing up in Japan, Masashi Soga enjoyed spending time outdoors catching insects and collecting flora. His parents were not outdoor enthusiasts, but his elementary school teacher was. Soga recalls, “They showed me how to collect and prepare specimens of butterflies. I appreciated nature quite a lot.” This early exposure fostered Soga’s appreciation for nature and he is now an ecologist at the University of Tokyo. Soga focuses on the mental health advantages of nature. His findings contribute to the expanding body of scientific literature demonstrating that spending time outside has a favourable influence on people’s health.

In Soga’s speciality, research on biophilia, which investigates the repercussions of humans’ affinity for the natural world, is significantly more comprehensive than the study on biophobia, the dread of nature. In contrast, Soga and a team of academics claim in a recent position paper that biophobia is a rising phenomenon that appears to be increasing alongside urbanisation. They suggest that biophobia is being reinforced and propagated throughout society in a vicious cycle, which can have detrimental effects on people’s health. Current research indicates that biophobic individuals are less inclined to support conservation initiatives, implying that increasing biophobia is also detrimental to wild environments.

To prevent or perhaps eradicate biophobia, it is necessary to comprehend its origins. The vicious cycle of biophobia proposed by the researchers is predicated on the notion that humans prefer to fear and avoid suffering. Reactions such as disgust can also result in avoidance behaviour. According to Soga and his colleagues, biophobia develops when an individual begins to perceive nature as something to be avoided, whether as a result of direct experience, family, friends, or the media. Over time, this may encourage someone to avoid nature more and more, or even want to eradicate it. Increasingly rare interactions with nature can result in a sense of isolation. And because individuals generally fear the unknown, this might exacerbate the phobia.

The ramifications of even a single person’s phobia are concerning, according to the experts. If a human lacks the expertise to interact with wildlife in a safe manner or never learns to differentiate between approachable and possibly hazardous species, they become ignorant of the natural world and must avoid it. This ignorance frequently leads to the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts. As a result, biophobia increases at the societal level and fewer individuals interact with nature. And because individuals are reluctant to safeguard something they fear, the outcome is a cycle of environmental degradation.

According to the study, education is vital for breaking the pattern. Several studies indicate that early exposure to nature in a safe environment, such as with a schoolteacher or parent, has a significant effect on children’s perspectives. Soga asserts that children are profoundly influenced by their parents’ actions. Outside of school, educational outreach initiatives in museums and parks can enhance people’s understanding of nature. Walks led by a naturalist or hobbies such as gardening might facilitate firsthand pleasant contacts. Soga says virtual reality can play a role in locations where access to nature is difficult.

As cities become larger and denser, access to green space will become increasingly difficult for many, particularly those living in low-income communities, says Linda Powers Tomasso, an environmental health researcher specialising in human-nature interactions. She adds that people’s attention spans, physical activity levels, and stress resistance are being badly impacted by the loss of everyday contact with the environment, not to mention the spiritual benefits of connecting with something larger than oneself.

While Powers Tomasso “entirely agrees” with the researchers’ ideas, she notes that there is another attitude between biophilia and biophobia that leads to the same outcomes as biophobia: apathy. She says, “If you don’t care about something, you won’t take the next step to safeguard it.” She explains that this is why education, nature mentorship, and making natural and urban green spaces pleasant and accessible are so crucial for conservation and human well-being. Tomasso states, “We only safeguard and care for what we know and love. If we never have the chance to get to know something, we will never build a passion for it.”

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

23. Why is an increase in biophobia hazardous to wild habitats?

Read the article below then answer the questions that follow.

Beware Creeping Biophobia

Growing up in Japan, Masashi Soga enjoyed spending time outdoors catching insects and collecting flora. His parents were not outdoor enthusiasts, but his elementary school teacher was. Soga recalls, “They showed me how to collect and prepare specimens of butterflies. I appreciated nature quite a lot.” This early exposure fostered Soga’s appreciation for nature and he is now an ecologist at the University of Tokyo. Soga focuses on the mental health advantages of nature. His findings contribute to the expanding body of scientific literature demonstrating that spending time outside has a favourable influence on people’s health.

In Soga’s speciality, research on biophilia, which investigates the repercussions of humans’ affinity for the natural world, is significantly more comprehensive than the study on biophobia, the dread of nature. In contrast, Soga and a team of academics claim in a recent position paper that biophobia is a rising phenomenon that appears to be increasing alongside urbanisation. They suggest that biophobia is being reinforced and propagated throughout society in a vicious cycle, which can have detrimental effects on people’s health. Current research indicates that biophobic individuals are less inclined to support conservation initiatives, implying that increasing biophobia is also detrimental to wild environments.

To prevent or perhaps eradicate biophobia, it is necessary to comprehend its origins. The vicious cycle of biophobia proposed by the researchers is predicated on the notion that humans prefer to fear and avoid suffering. Reactions such as disgust can also result in avoidance behaviour. According to Soga and his colleagues, biophobia develops when an individual begins to perceive nature as something to be avoided, whether as a result of direct experience, family, friends, or the media. Over time, this may encourage someone to avoid nature more and more, or even want to eradicate it. Increasingly rare interactions with nature can result in a sense of isolation. And because individuals generally fear the unknown, this might exacerbate the phobia.

The ramifications of even a single person’s phobia are concerning, according to the experts. If a human lacks the expertise to interact with wildlife in a safe manner or never learns to differentiate between approachable and possibly hazardous species, they become ignorant of the natural world and must avoid it. This ignorance frequently leads to the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts. As a result, biophobia increases at the societal level and fewer individuals interact with nature. And because individuals are reluctant to safeguard something they fear, the outcome is a cycle of environmental degradation.

According to the study, education is vital for breaking the pattern. Several studies indicate that early exposure to nature in a safe environment, such as with a schoolteacher or parent, has a significant effect on children’s perspectives. Soga asserts that children are profoundly influenced by their parents’ actions. Outside of school, educational outreach initiatives in museums and parks can enhance people’s understanding of nature. Walks led by a naturalist or hobbies such as gardening might facilitate firsthand pleasant contacts. Soga says virtual reality can play a role in locations where access to nature is difficult.

As cities become larger and denser, access to green space will become increasingly difficult for many, particularly those living in low-income communities, says Linda Powers Tomasso, an environmental health researcher specialising in human-nature interactions. She adds that people’s attention spans, physical activity levels, and stress resistance are being badly impacted by the loss of everyday contact with the environment, not to mention the spiritual benefits of connecting with something larger than oneself.

While Powers Tomasso “entirely agrees” with the researchers’ ideas, she notes that there is another attitude between biophilia and biophobia that leads to the same outcomes as biophobia: apathy. She says, “If you don’t care about something, you won’t take the next step to safeguard it.” She explains that this is why education, nature mentorship, and making natural and urban green spaces pleasant and accessible are so crucial for conservation and human well-being. Tomasso states, “We only safeguard and care for what we know and love. If we never have the chance to get to know something, we will never build a passion for it.”

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

24. What is the significance of the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts as mentioned in the article?

Read the article below then answer the questions that follow.

Beware Creeping Biophobia

Growing up in Japan, Masashi Soga enjoyed spending time outdoors catching insects and collecting flora. His parents were not outdoor enthusiasts, but his elementary school teacher was. Soga recalls, “They showed me how to collect and prepare specimens of butterflies. I appreciated nature quite a lot.” This early exposure fostered Soga’s appreciation for nature and he is now an ecologist at the University of Tokyo. Soga focuses on the mental health advantages of nature. His findings contribute to the expanding body of scientific literature demonstrating that spending time outside has a favourable influence on people’s health.

In Soga’s speciality, research on biophilia, which investigates the repercussions of humans’ affinity for the natural world, is significantly more comprehensive than the study on biophobia, the dread of nature. In contrast, Soga and a team of academics claim in a recent position paper that biophobia is a rising phenomenon that appears to be increasing alongside urbanisation. They suggest that biophobia is being reinforced and propagated throughout society in a vicious cycle, which can have detrimental effects on people’s health. Current research indicates that biophobic individuals are less inclined to support conservation initiatives, implying that increasing biophobia is also detrimental to wild environments.

To prevent or perhaps eradicate biophobia, it is necessary to comprehend its origins. The vicious cycle of biophobia proposed by the researchers is predicated on the notion that humans prefer to fear and avoid suffering. Reactions such as disgust can also result in avoidance behaviour. According to Soga and his colleagues, biophobia develops when an individual begins to perceive nature as something to be avoided, whether as a result of direct experience, family, friends, or the media. Over time, this may encourage someone to avoid nature more and more, or even want to eradicate it. Increasingly rare interactions with nature can result in a sense of isolation. And because individuals generally fear the unknown, this might exacerbate the phobia.

The ramifications of even a single person’s phobia are concerning, according to the experts. If a human lacks the expertise to interact with wildlife in a safe manner or never learns to differentiate between approachable and possibly hazardous species, they become ignorant of the natural world and must avoid it. This ignorance frequently leads to the dissemination of sensationalist articles and false facts. As a result, biophobia increases at the societal level and fewer individuals interact with nature. And because individuals are reluctant to safeguard something they fear, the outcome is a cycle of environmental degradation.

According to the study, education is vital for breaking the pattern. Several studies indicate that early exposure to nature in a safe environment, such as with a schoolteacher or parent, has a significant effect on children’s perspectives. Soga asserts that children are profoundly influenced by their parents’ actions. Outside of school, educational outreach initiatives in museums and parks can enhance people’s understanding of nature. Walks led by a naturalist or hobbies such as gardening might facilitate firsthand pleasant contacts. Soga says virtual reality can play a role in locations where access to nature is difficult.

As cities become larger and denser, access to green space will become increasingly difficult for many, particularly those living in low-income communities, says Linda Powers Tomasso, an environmental health researcher specialising in human-nature interactions. She adds that people’s attention spans, physical activity levels, and stress resistance are being badly impacted by the loss of everyday contact with the environment, not to mention the spiritual benefits of connecting with something larger than oneself.

While Powers Tomasso “entirely agrees” with the researchers’ ideas, she notes that there is another attitude between biophilia and biophobia that leads to the same outcomes as biophobia: apathy. She says, “If you don’t care about something, you won’t take the next step to safeguard it.” She explains that this is why education, nature mentorship, and making natural and urban green spaces pleasant and accessible are so crucial for conservation and human well-being. Tomasso states, “We only safeguard and care for what we know and love. If we never have the chance to get to know something, we will never build a passion for it.”

Answer the following questions by choosing the letter of the best answer.

25. Which of the following is NOT a way individuals and society as a whole promote education and awareness of nature?