📅 Class Timetable

Session times for Semester 2026

One 90-minute session per week. All classes delivered live via Zoom.

Term 3
July 21 - September 22
10 weeks
Term 4
October 13 - December 15
10 weeks
Day
Time
Session
Tuesday
7:00pm - 8:30pm
High School Writing Wizards, Senior (Y9-Y10)
⏰ The Clock Is Ticking
Your child is months away from the HSC Preliminary course. English is the only subject they can't drop.
Every other weak subject can be swapped out, scaled around, or supplemented. English Advanced is compulsory and inescapable. It counts. It scales. And the internal assessment ranks that determine 50% of their final HSC mark start being set the moment Year 11 begins.
50%
of their HSC English mark
comes from internal ranks
84,000
students in the 2025
HSC cohort (largest ever)
29,000
sat English Advanced
(34.7% of all students)
99.95 to 99.80
The ATAR gap is almost
always English

🚨 "Their Year 10 report says B, and internal ranks start next year"

A B in Year 10 English doesn't just mean "pretty good." It means your child is entering Year 11 without the analytical foundations that separate Band 5 from Band 6. Once Preliminary starts, internal assessment ranks begin immediately, and catching up while simultaneously learning new HSC content is nearly impossible. The students who get Band 6 built their essay architecture in Year 9 and 10. The students who get Band 5 tried to build it in Year 11. That's the entire difference.

❌ "They can identify a metaphor, but they can't explain what it does"

This is the most common trap. Your child can spot techniques: "Clarke uses a metaphor" or "the composer employs juxtaposition." But they can't explain the effect, how the technique positions the reader, constructs meaning, or connects to the text's central argument. The difference between Band 4 and Band 6 is not identifying techniques. It's explaining their effect with precision and linking them to a sustained thesis. That's what IQTVE teaches. That's what we drill every single week.

📉 "They're getting 70% in English and 90% in everything else"

Your child scored in the top 10% to get into their selective school. They're pulling high distinctions in maths and science. But English? The gap is 15 to 20 marks. That's not a talent problem, it's a framework problem. Nobody has taught them how to structure an argument, how to write a thesis that does more than restate the question, or how to construct a PETAL paragraph that actually analyses rather than describes.

🤖 "ChatGPT writes their practice essays, and they sound like everyone else"

Here's what HSC markers see every year: hundreds of essays that sound identical. Same structure, same vocabulary, same empty phrases like "effectively conveys" and "this highlights the concept of." These are students who've trained on ChatGPT output instead of developing their own analytical voice. Band 6 rewards originality, precision, and personal engagement, the exact opposite of AI-generated writing.

😤 "The school teaches content, but nobody teaches them how to write about it"

Your child's English teacher assigns a novel, discusses themes, and then sets an essay. But nobody explicitly teaches the architecture of the essay itself: how to write an introduction that establishes a position, how to construct body paragraphs that analyse rather than narrate, how to thread an argument across 1,000 words, how to write a conclusion that synthesises rather than summarises. We teach the architecture. Systematically. Every week.

📊 The Evidence
Even at the top selective schools, English is the weak link.
Your child's school produces incredible STEM results. But look at the data. These overall Band 6 rates are dragged down by one subject, and it's not maths.
North Sydney Boys
64.9%
Overall Band 6 Rate
Exceptionally strong, but the exception
James Ruse
55%
Overall Band 6 Rate
STEM powerhouse, English not a strength
Normanhurst Boys
55%
Overall Band 6 Rate
Science & maths focused culture
Baulkham Hills
54%
Overall Band 6 Rate
Largest cohort, English inconsistent

And outside the top 5, it gets worse:

Girraween
~35%
Overall Band 6 Rate
Maths/science culture, English struggles
Penrith Selective
~35%
Overall Band 6 Rate
English is the gap subject
St George Girls
~32%
Overall Band 6 Rate
English performance moderate
Hurlstone Ag
~29%
Overall Band 6 Rate
English is the constraint

Even at James Ruse, only ~55% of exam entries score a Band 6. These students get 95+ in Extension Maths and Chemistry. The subject pulling the rate down is English. At Girraween, Penrith, and Hurlstone, two-thirds of entries don't hit Band 6.

Your child isn't failing because they lack intelligence. They're failing because their school teaches content without teaching the essay architecture needed to write about it at Band 6 level.

"The school's IQTVE framework (Idea, Quote, Technique, Verb, Evaluate) was key to my success."
Emily Phi, 2025 HSC English Advanced First in Course (equal), North Sydney Girls. ATAR: 99.95

Sources: 2024 HSC Distinguished Achievers data (NESA), school-reported success rates via Better Education, KIS Academics, Apex Tuition.

⚠️ Is your child using ChatGPT for English? That's why they sound like everyone else.

HSC markers read thousands of essays. They can spot AI-assisted writing instantly, not because it's bad, but because it all sounds the same.

→ ChatGPT doesn't know the NESA marking criteria. It optimises for comprehensiveness, not analytical precision.

→ AI analysis uses the same phrases every time: "effectively conveys," "highlights the notion of," "positions the responder to." Markers penalise this.

→ Students who rely on AI can't write under exam conditions. They can't bring ChatGPT into the exam hall. When they sit Paper 1 or Paper 2, they freeze.

→ Our program teaches your child proprietary analytical frameworks developed from actual state-ranking essays. They learn to construct arguments independently, under pressure, in their own voice.

👩‍🏫 Meet Your Tutor
Taught by Miranda Quantrill.
A tutor who understands both the rigour of STEM and the depth of literary analysis, because she's lived both.
MQ

Miranda Quantrill

98 in HSC English · UNSW Medicine

Miranda scored 98 in HSC English and is currently studying Medicine at UNSW, proof that analytical rigour and deep literary understanding aren't mutually exclusive. She knows exactly what high school students need to hear: English isn't a "talent" subject. It has rules, structures, and frameworks, just like science does.

Her approach is systematic: IQTVE for paragraph-level analysis, PETAL for essay architecture, and close reading protocols that teach students to see what the marker sees. She specialises in taking STEM-strong students who "hate English" and turning it into their competitive advantage.

Your child also has access to a dedicated Success Coach who monitors progress, provides feedback on homework submissions, and communicates directly with parents via Telegram and WhatsApp.

📚 Term 3 Curriculum
Unreliable narration, historical complicity, and university-level literary analysis through The Remains of the Day.
Ishiguro's novel demands the most rigorous analytical thinking, the most disciplined prose, and the most intellectually ambitious creative writing the cohort has yet produced. Stevens' carefully controlled prose itself becomes the subject of analysis. Term 4 builds on this foundation with new texts and consolidation of skills.
📖
Term 3 Novel Study: The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
Memory · Duty · Loss · Self-Deception · Regret
WEEK 1The Unreliable Narrator: Reading Against the Grain

Students examine how Stevens' carefully controlled, formal prose style itself becomes a subject of analysis. The distinction between what Stevens explicitly states and what the text reveals through his lacunae becomes the basis for sophisticated literary argument.

Unreliable narrator as techniqueReading against the narratorGaps, evasions, strategic silenceVoice as evidence
Homework: Write a 500-word analytical response examining one passage in which Stevens' explicit statement and the text's underlying revelation diverge. Identify the gap, name what it reveals, and trace its significance.
WEEK 2Formal Prose Style as Evidence

Ishiguro's mastery is studied at the level of the sentence. Students examine the relationship between Stevens' diction, syntax, and worldview, and learn to read formal prose style itself as analytical evidence rather than as decoration.

Diction analysisSyntax as worldviewStyle as characterProse pattern as evidence
Homework: Select a single paragraph of Stevens' narration. Write a 500-word close reading examining how three specific syntactic or lexical choices reveal the limits of his self-knowledge.
WEEK 3Historical Complicity & Moral Failure

Students engage with Ishiguro's exploration of historical complicity, examining how the narrative construction permits readers to perceive Stevens' failures of moral courage and emotional honesty whilst he himself remains unable to fully acknowledge them.

Historical context as ethical frameworkMoral failure & narrative permissionReader as ethical agentCritical autonomy from the narrator
Homework: Write a 600-word analytical response addressing the question: 'Through what narrative techniques does Ishiguro grant the reader moral perception that the narrator himself lacks?' Use embedded evidence and IQTVE structure.
WEEK 4IQTVE at HSC Band 6 Standard

The IQTVE framework operates at full Band 6 precision. Students learn to construct arguable conceptual claims, to embed evidence with syntactic control, and to thread evaluative verbs and authorial-purpose analysis through every paragraph.

IQTVE at Band 6 precisionConceptual vs descriptive claimsEvaluative verbs (problematises, destabilises, foregrounds)Authorial-purpose threading
Homework: Write three IQTVE paragraphs in response to: 'How does Ishiguro construct Stevens\' self-deception as both individual failure and systemic critique?' Each paragraph must operate at full IQTVE precision (700 words).
WEEK 5Critical Perspective: Memory, Subjectivity & Representation

Comparative analysis situates The Remains of the Day within broader questions of narrative reliability, subjective memory, and the ethical responsibilities of representation. Students learn to deploy critical perspective as analytical instrument, not decoration.

Memory as constructed narrativeSubjectivity & textual authorityThe ethics of representationCritical perspective as instrument
Homework: Write a 600-word analytical response examining how Ishiguro uses Stevens' memory as a constructed narrative. Engage with the ethical implications of subjective memory in literary representation.
WEEK 6Discursive Writing at Its Most Dialectical

Discursive writing reaches its most dialectical form. Students sustain genuine intellectual tension across an extended argument, holding multiple valid readings of the text's ambiguities without collapsing into reductive resolution.

Sustained dialectical argumentHolding ambiguity without resolutionMultiple valid readingsCritical autonomy in argument
Homework: Write a discursive essay (700 words) exploring: 'Is Stevens a victim of historical circumstance, the architect of his own moral failure, or both at once?' Sustain the tension across the entire piece.
WEEK 7Extended Comparative Analysis

Students construct integrated multi-paragraph comparative analysis between The Remains of the Day and a complementary text, threading argument across techniques, structures, and thematic concerns simultaneously, at examination standard.

Integrated multi-paragraph comparisonMulti-domain comparative analysisThreading sustained argumentExamination-standard comparison
Homework: Write a comparative essay (800 words) examining how Ishiguro and one other writer construct narrative unreliability as ethical critique. Integrate the texts throughout. Do not block-compare.
WEEK 8The Integrated Literary Essay: Form, Style, Theme

HSC Band 6 essays don't treat theme, technique, and structure as separate categories. Students learn to construct integrated literary analysis where every paragraph advances a thesis while simultaneously analysing form, style, and thematic concern.

Integrated vs siloed analysisForm-content integrationThreading thesis across paragraphsHSC Module B preview
Homework: Write a sustained integrated essay (900 words) on: 'In The Remains of the Day, form and content are inseparable.' Each paragraph must integrate analysis of formal, stylistic, and thematic dimensions.
WEEK 9Stylistic Pastiche & Conscious Narrative Manipulation

Creative writing at this level encompasses stylistic pastiche and conscious narrative manipulation. Students compose extended pieces in dialogue with Ishiguro's formal strategies, deliberately constructing unreliability through narrative voice.

Stylistic pasticheDeliberate construction of unreliabilityNarrative voice as ethical instrumentCritical reflection on craft
Homework: Write an 800-word creative piece featuring a deliberately unreliable narrator in conscious dialogue with Ishiguro. Append a 200-word critical commentary explaining your authorial choices and the unreliability you have constructed.
WEEK 10Culminating Portfolio & HSC Launchpad

Students select their culminating portfolio: analytical essay, comparative essay, or extended creative work with critical commentary. Plus an HSC Launchpad briefing on Year 11 modules and how this term's skills map directly onto Band 6 success.

Portfolio selection & final revisionYear 11 readiness assessmentHSC modules briefingBefore/after writing comparison
Homework: Submit your culminating portfolio piece. Write a 250-word reflection identifying the single most significant analytical skill you have developed this term, with reference to specific examples from your Week 1 versus Week 10 work.
Term 4 Curriculum

Term 4 builds directly on the Term 3 foundation, introducing a new text study and consolidating skills across analytical, comparative, and creative modes. Full Term 4 curriculum overview will be shared with families at the start of Term 4.

✅ What's Included
Everything your child needs. Nothing they don't.
Every feature is designed to produce one outcome: measurable improvement in your child's analytical writing ability.
🎥

Weekly 90-Minute Live LMS Class

90 minutes of live instruction every week. Real-time interaction, live essay workshopping, Socratic questioning. Not pre-recorded. Not passive. Your child is thinking, writing, and improving in every session.

📖

Literary Novel Study

A sophisticated literary text studied at HSC-level rigour, with close reading, technique analysis, and integrated literary essay writing. Students learn to read literary fiction the way Band 6 essays require.

📝

Expert Essay Feedback

Every essay receives detailed, rubric-aligned feedback from Miranda and the coaching team, specific coaching on technique identification, thesis strength, evaluative language, and argument structure.

📄

Weekly Homework + Model Responses

One analytical writing task per week with full model responses. Students see what Band 6 looks like, then measure their own work against it and improve systematically.

📊

Progress Reports & Parent Updates

Mid-term and end-of-term reports with before/after writing samples. You'll see your child's improvement in black and white, not just hear about it.

💬

Success Coach + 7-Day Support

Dedicated Success Coach monitors homework, provides feedback, and communicates directly with parents via Telegram and WhatsApp. 7 days a week.

🚀 Included with Every Enrolment
A suite of intelligent learning apps, built into your child's programme
Every Writing Wizards student gets access to Scholarly's suite of adaptive learning apps, continuously adapting to their progress.
📖

Readly

Personalised reading comprehension with literary and non-fiction texts that build analytical skills

✍️

Writely

Guided analytical writing with PETAL scaffolding, thesis construction, and essay feedback

💬

Vocably

Advanced vocabulary and technique terminology building tied to weekly texts and essays

🔢

Mathly

Adaptive maths practice to keep quantitative skills sharp alongside English development

Unlimited personalised practice

With endless, personalised questions and reading materials, these apps provide unlimited practice opportunities.

One connected ecosystem

Every app connects to the Scholarly platform, giving students more ways to grow in Reading, Writing, Vocabulary, and Maths.

✨ The Scholarly Difference
Why parents choose Scholarly
Writing Wizards isn't just tutoring. It's a complete learning environment with technology, expert instruction, and support.
🤖

In-Class Learning Support

  • Instant Q&A help during lessons via Lana and iDoubt
  • Unlimited questions with safe, confidential support
  • Students never feel stuck or left behind
💻

Interactive Technology

  • Real-time lesson transcripts and live polls
  • Smart note-taking with auto-save
  • Parent dashboard tracking progress in real time
🎓

Expert Instruction & Support

  • Highly-qualified tutors with stellar academic backgrounds
  • 7-day support via multiple platforms
  • Detailed progress reports with percentile rankings
  • Gamified learning with points and awards

Don't just take our word for it. See our results →

💰 Pricing
Invest in your child's English future.
Expert-led tuition with structured curriculum, real feedback, and measurable progress. Compare to private tutors at $80 to $150/hr who aren't even teaching a structured curriculum.

Semester, Terms 3 + 4

SAVE $100 vs term-by-term
$1,380
20 weeks · 2 full terms of live instruction
  • Weekly 90-minute live LMS class
  • Literary novel study at HSC-level rigour
  • Expert essay feedback on every submission
  • Weekly homework + model responses
  • Success Coach with mid-term check-ins
  • Before/after writing portfolio
  • Full recordings library
  • End-of-semester progress report
Enrol for Semester →
❓ Frequently Asked
Common questions from parents.
My child is at a selective school. Do they still need this?
Especially if they're at a selective school. Most selectives are STEM-focused, they produce incredible maths and science results but their English teaching assumes analytical skills that haven't been explicitly taught. Even at James Ruse and Baulkham Hills, only ~55% of exam entries hit Band 6. This program fills that gap with systematic frameworks (IQTVE, PETAL) that your child's school is unlikely to teach directly.
Is this a pre-recorded course?
No. Every class is live on our LMS platform with Miranda Quantrill, your English tutor who scored 98 in HSC English. Real-time interaction, live essay workshopping, and immediate feedback. Recordings are available for 2 weeks after each class for revision.
How is this different from school English?
School teaches English through a breadth curriculum, your child reads texts, answers questions, and gets vague feedback. We teach the analytical engine: the specific frameworks, paragraph structures, and rubric-decoding skills that turn a C essay into an A. Think of it as the operating system upgrade that makes all their school content click.
What if my child is using ChatGPT for their English homework?
This is actually one of the main reasons to enrol. Students who rely on AI tools never develop their own analytical instinct or natural voice, both essential for Band 6. Our program actively weans students off AI dependency by teaching proprietary frameworks and providing detailed, rubric-specific expert feedback that builds genuine skill.
How much time per week does it require?
Approximately 2.5 to 3 hours: 90 minutes for the live class plus 30 to 60 minutes for the weekly homework. All homework is submitted typed (PDF or text) and receives feedback within 1 to 3 days.
Year 11 won't wait. Neither should you.

The students who get Band 6 didn't start in Year 11. They started in Year 9 and 10, with the frameworks, the practice, and the analytical instinct already in place.

Enrol Now →