Day 2 Writing Homework
Prompt : Revise your persuasive letter from Day 1 to incorporate the advanced techniques learned today:
Review and enhance the precision of your language throughout
Add at least three specific pieces of evidence (statistical, historical, expert opinion)
Include one paragraph that addresses and refutes a counterargument
Apply at least three advanced persuasive techniques from today’s lesson
Please upload your homework as a comment below:
- Due Date : April 17, 2025
- Feedback will be shared in 3-5 days
17 thoughts on “Day 2 Writing Homework”
Dear Councillor Bob,
I am writing to urge you—respectfully yet passionately—to reconsider the decision to demolish the historic town square library. This building is not merely a structure of bricks and timber; it is a sanctuary of learning, a hub of community, and a cornerstone of our shared identity. Why would we remove a place where so many find comfort? How can we call it progress if it silences a space where voices grow? And most of all, who will support those who depend on the library once it is gone?
This library is not just a building—it is a bridge to knowledge, a haven for connection, and a springboard for opportunity. For children, it offers a safe, enriching environment where they can explore new ideas, dive into stories, and collaborate with peers. For elderly residents, it is a tranquil retreat—a space for companionship, curiosity, and calm. For low-income families, it provides access to essential tools: internet, technology, job resources, and educational materials. According to the American Library Association, over 54% of libraries serve as the only free source of internet access in their communities. Without this space, countless individuals—students completing homework, jobseekers building their futures, immigrants learning English—would be left without vital support.
What will become of our community’s intellectual heart if this demolition proceeds? It will be replaced by a commercial shell, a place of transactions instead of transformations. A shopping center may offer temporary convenience, but the library offers lasting wisdom. One may entertain for an hour; the other enriches for a lifetime.
Picture this: a young girl dashes into the library, her backpack bouncing, heart full of anticipation. Her favorite book—a portal to another world—waits for her on the shelf. The golden afternoon light filters through the high windows; the hush of the library wraps around her like a warm blanket. Now imagine her returning two weeks later. The walls are gone. The scent of books has vanished. Her reading corner is rubble. Her card—once a key to wonder—now unlocks nothing.
Some argue that tearing down the library is necessary to make room for economic development. But must progress come at the cost of our heritage? Could we not, instead, invest in its restoration—repair the roof, repaint the walls, update the tech infrastructure? Urban historian Dr. Carla Hayden reminds us that “when we lose a library, we lose a public good—one that cannot easily be replaced by profit-driven spaces.” Progress should not erase memory; it should build upon it.
Without our library, we lose our past. Without our library, we compromise our present. Without our library, we mortgage our future. This library has educated our minds, nourished our souls, and fortified our community bonds for generations. A new building might be modern, but it will never echo with the stories of generations. It will never carry the laughter of story hour, the silence of study, the thrill of discovery.
Please, Councillor Bob—don’t let bulldozers flatten a legacy. Don’t trade community for commerce. Don’t let dust settle where dreams once soared. Choose preservation. Choose people. Choose the library.
Sincerely,
Alioth
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – stephxlihotmail-com
Home work
Day 2 – Library Protection – enhance
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Yusuf Khan
Here you go!
Dear Council letter intensive
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Dawood
George Thomas
123 Willow Lane
Riverdale, NY 1234
April 14, 2025
To:
The City Council of Riverdale
456 Civic Center Plaza
Riverdale, NY 1234
Subject: Urgent Appeal Against the Demolition of Riverdale Public Library
Dear Esteemed Members of the City Council,
I am writing to you with deep concern and heartfelt urgency regarding the proposed demolition of the Riverdale Public Library—a treasured institution that has stood at the heart of our community for generations. I implore you to reconsider this devastating decision, which threatens not just the physical structure of a library, but the very soul of our neighborhood.
Have we so quickly forgotten the quiet sanctuary that libraries offer in an increasingly chaotic world?
Can we, in good conscience, allow bulldozers to erase a space where knowledge, comfort, and community have bloomed for decades?
And most pressingly—how will we explain to our children why we allowed a cornerstone of their future to be reduced to rubble?
The Riverdale Public Library is not merely a building; it is a sanctuary for the curious, a haven for the weary, a lighthouse for the lost. Its warm, oak-paneled walls have heard the first stuttered words of eager readers, the soft hum of scholarly discussions, and the quiet sighs of those who sought refuge among its shelves.
You might ask, “But isn’t progress inevitable? Mustn’t we make way for modern development?”
To that, I answer: Progress that erases the past is not progress—it is loss in disguise.
Imagine the painful image of its destruction: bricks cracking, glass shattering, shelves collapsing in a deafening, dusty funeral for literacy. That is not just debris—that is the collapse of culture, the downfall of decades of dreams.
This is not just about sentiment. It’s about logic, ethics, and duty.
Logically, the library provides free internet, educational resources, and a safe communal space—essentials many Riverdale residents rely on.
Ethically, it is our obligation to protect institutions that serve the public good.
And emotionally—how can we ignore the deep pain this loss would inflict on our neighbors, our children, and our future?
Let me paint for you a vivid picture of what we risk losing: as you step through its heavy wooden doors, you’re greeted by the scent of aged paper and polished floors. The children’s corner bursts with color—plush beanbags, whimsical murals, shelves of fairy tales and picture books that beg to be opened. Upstairs, the reference section stands proud, rows upon rows of encyclopedias, biographies, and local histories bathed in natural light from the high skylight. The librarian greets each patron not with formality, but with the warmth of an old friend. This is not just a place—it is a presence, a heartbeat, a home.
We ask you to act not out of convenience, but out of conviction. Not out of pressure, but out of principle. Not out of obligation, but out of genuine care.
Use your power not to destroy but to protect. Use your voice not to silence but to save. Use your position not to erase but to elevate.
Is it not our duty, as citizens and as leaders, to preserve the spaces that nurture minds and uplift spirits? Should we not champion institutions that offer opportunity to all, regardless of background or income?
In closing, I beseech you to stand with us—students, elders, families, and future generations—in preserving the Riverdale Public Library. There are solutions that do not involve demolition: restoration, repurposing, or expansion. Let us work together to write a new chapter for this beloved space, rather than close the book forever.
Yours sincerely,
George Thomas
Riverdale Year 6 student
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – JEENA ELIZABETH
Subject: The Urgent Need for Renewable Energy Investment
Dear Council,
I am writing to urge you to consider increasing investment in renewable energy. As we face an unprecedented climate crisis, the transition to renewable energy is not only a moral imperative but an economic opportunity. The evidence supporting the benefits of renewable energy is irrefutable, and I strongly believe that our future depends on the choices we make today.
First and foremost, the impact of renewable energy on reducing carbon emissions cannot be overstated. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IREA), renewable energy could prevent up to 4.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030, which is equivalent to taking 900 million cars off the road. This shift would dramatically reduce our carbon footprint and slow the rate of global warming. In addition, solar and wind energy have already demonstrated their cost-effectiveness, with wind energy alone seeing a 70% drop in cost over the past decade, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
Moreover, investing in renewable energy fosters economic growth. The renewable energy sector already employs over 12 million people worldwide, and this number is expected to double by 2030, according to the International Labour Organization (ILO). Countries that have committed to green energy policies, such as Germany, have seen significant economic growth and job creation in their renewable energy sectors. Germany’s Energiewende (Energy Transition) has not only reduced its reliance on fossil fuels but has also positioned the country as a global leader in the green technology market.
Some critics may argue that the shift to renewable energy is too costly, especially in the short term. However, this concern fails to account for the long-term savings and benefits. According to a report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the cost of inaction—continuing to rely on fossil fuels—will far exceed the initial investment in renewable infrastructure. In fact, every dollar invested in renewable energy could generate up to $3 in long-term savings due to reduced healthcare costs, lower environmental cleanup expenses, and decreased reliance on imported fossil fuels.
Furthermore, the long-term effects of continued dependence on fossil fuels—such as rising energy prices, geopolitical instability, and health-related costs—far outweigh any short-term financial concerns. If we allow this resistance to change to persist, we are locking ourselves into an increasingly unsustainable system that will only grow more expensive and dangerous over time.
To be clear, renewable energy is not just an environmental necessity—it is an economic catalyst that will drive innovation, create jobs, and ensure a sustainable future for generations to come. The time to act is now.
Thank you for your attention to this crucial matter. I am confident that with bold leadership, we can transition to a clean, sustainable, and prosperous energy future.
sincerely
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Anniella HU
In the files
Writing Homework H 2
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Matthew Hwang
Done!
Day 2 Writing
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Sophie Xia
here is my revised persuasive letter
Untitled document (2)
FEEDBACK
Day 2 – Divjot
done
Day 2 Writing