Week 9 Writing Homework
- September 18, 2024
- 8:19 pm
- 56 Comments
- Write a persuasive essay arguing whether individual actions or systemic changes are more crucial in addressing climate change. (500 Words)
Interview Question: What is your favourite subject, and why? (200 words)
Please upload your homework as a comment below:
56 thoughts on “Week 9 Writing Homework”
The Crucial Role of Systemic Change in Addressing Climate Change
Climate change is perhaps the most pressing issue of our time, posing significant risks to ecosystems, economies, and human health. The debate over whether individual actions or systemic changes are more crucial in addressing this global crisis has sparked considerable discussion. While individual efforts are valuable, systemic changes are fundamentally more important in combating climate change effectively.
Individual actions, such as reducing personal carbon footprints, recycling, and conserving energy, are important for fostering environmental awareness and encouraging sustainable habits. They can contribute to a collective effort, influencing community norms and potentially inspiring broader change. However, relying solely on individual actions is insufficient given the scale and complexity of the climate crisis. The impact of individual efforts, though beneficial, is limited compared to the transformative potential of systemic changes.
Systemic changes refer to alterations in policies, regulations, and institutional practices that address climate change at a structural level. These changes involve government regulations, corporate sustainability practices, and international agreements. Systemic changes are crucial because they have the power to enact broad, far-reaching impacts that individual actions alone cannot achieve.
One of the most significant benefits of systemic changes is their capacity to drive large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. For example, implementing carbon pricing mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, can incentivize businesses and industries to reduce their emissions. Such policies can create economic conditions that favor renewable energy sources and encourage innovation in green technologies. By contrast, individual efforts to reduce personal carbon footprints may have minimal impact on overall emissions if large-scale industrial practices remain unchanged.
Moreover, systemic changes can address the root causes of climate change by influencing large sectors of the economy and setting ambitious targets for emissions reductions. For instance, the Paris Agreement represents a monumental international commitment to limit global temperature rise. This agreement demonstrates how coordinated efforts among nations can drive substantial progress towards climate goals. Individual actions, while meaningful, cannot replicate the comprehensive impact of such international agreements.
Systemic changes also play a critical role in ensuring equitable solutions to climate change. Climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable communities, and addressing these disparities requires systemic interventions. Policies that promote climate justice, invest in renewable energy infrastructure, and support adaptation efforts in disadvantaged areas can mitigate the unequal impacts of climate change. Individual actions are less likely to address these structural inequalities effectively.
Furthermore, systemic changes can reshape societal norms and values by integrating environmental sustainability into various sectors. For example, changes in public transportation infrastructure can reduce reliance on personal vehicles, leading to widespread reductions in emissions. Likewise, regulations on energy efficiency in buildings and appliances can promote sustainable practices on a broad scale. Such transformations are essential for creating a culture of sustainability and resilience.
In conclusion, while individual actions are valuable for raising awareness and fostering a culture of sustainability, systemic changes are fundamentally more crucial in addressing climate change. Systemic changes have the power to drive large-scale reductions in emissions, address root causes, ensure equitable solutions, and reshape societal norms. To effectively combat climate change and create a sustainable future, prioritizing systemic changes is essential.
FEEDBACK
tli.sydney
The Impact of Systemic Change on the World.
Global warming has always been one of the pressuring hardships that Earth has experienced, posing threats to the environment, Biological life cycles, breathing and the health of people and animals. The debate over whether human have the own right they want to make the Earth not as bad to the opposing whether if the government should make a rule about global warming. While the individual choices are valuable the systemic changes are more efficient in tackling climate change.
Individual actions, such as recycling and keeping the energy usage around 75 MMBtu, are important for awareness of people and the spreading of the habits. They can contribute by a legion of people, influencing people to change in the area and maybe around the country. However, the time that the legion has put in would all be in vain as each person produces 1 kilogram of CO2 and also the average per person every year is 4 tons. So that means that the work would not get the country anywhere close to their goals.
On the other hand, systemic changes are by the government which means that the government can just say that only electric cars are allowed. So, the scale of impact will be way higher than individual actions as compared to the government actions, like implementing regulations, carbon taxes, renewable energy incentives, and international agreements, can affect entire economies and industries.
Also, the one of the biggest things about systemic changes is that the government can make large scale rules that can quickly change the future. For example, a plane flight normally produces 14580 CO2 per day and there are 101878 flights per day and when you times them together it’s the amount per day just for flights which is 1485381240 CO2 per day for flights. But the government can just say that the planes can stop flying through areas with very cold and humid conditions, known as Ice Super Saturated Regions (ISSR). In comparison to individual choices, they would just be stuck at point blank.
Furthermore, systemic changes reshape what the humans have done in the past by integrating environmental sustainability into various sectors. For example, changes in transportation can reduce the reliance on personal vehicles as there will only be petrol cars by 2035 where there is already a lot of electric cars. Then electric bus will be available in 2035 which means that the production of cars will lessen, in the end, there will only be electric buses. Also, there will be electric planes by 2030 which means like by 2050 there will be completely zero petrol things.
As the world becomes to produce less and less of CO2, the ecosystem can rebuild, animals can relax on the fields and the sea life can swim freely without eating any plastic bags.
In conclusion, the individual choices of the people can inspire but cannot make big progress. On the other hand, systemic changes are just ultimately more efficient in creating fast progress around global warming.
FEEDBACK
stephxlihotmail-com
Here’s my H/W
Week 9 Writing Homework
FEEDBACK
liuyin_ozhotmail-com
Climate change is probably the most critical issue of our day, with serious consequences for ecosystems, the economy, and human health. The issue over whether individual acts or structural reforms are more important in tackling the global crisis has roused intense debate. Individual actions are significant, but structural changes are fundamentally more crucial in effectively preventing climate change.
Individual activities, such as lowering personal carbon footprints, recycling, and saving energy, are critical to raising environmental awareness and promoting sustainable practices. They can contribute to a group effort, influencing community norms and possibly inspiring greater change. Individual initiatives, however, are insufficient given the scope and complexity of the climate catastrophe. Individual efforts, while good, have a limited influence in comparison to the transformational power of systemic change.
Systemic changes are changes in laws, legislation, and institutional practices that address climate change on a systemic basis. These developments include government rules, company sustainability policies, and international agreements. Systemic changes are critical because they have the ability to have far-reaching consequences that individual actions alone cannot achieve.
One of the most notable advantages of systemic improvements is their ability to achieve large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon pricing methods, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, can encourage firms and industries to decrease their emissions. Such policies have the potential to establish economic conditions that favour renewable energy sources and foster green technology innovation. Individual attempts to minimise personal carbon footprints may have little effect on total emissions if large-scale industrial practices stay intact.
Furthermore, systemic adjustments can address the underlying causes of climate change by affecting major segments of the economy and establishing aggressive emissions reduction objectives. For example, the Paris Agreement reflects a massive multinational commitment to limiting global temperature rise. This agreement illustrates how coordinated efforts among governments may result in significant progress towards climate goals. Individual acts, while important, cannot mimic the overall impact of such multinational accords.
In conclusion, systemic improvements are essentially more important in tackling climate change, even while individual acts are beneficial for increasing awareness and establishing a culture of sustainability. Large-scale emissions reductions, addressing the underlying causes, ensuring equitable remedies, and reshaping societal norms can all be achieved through systemic changes. It is imperative to prioritize systemic reforms in order to effectively address climate change and create a sustainable future.
FEEDBACK
Diana D
I’ll do the interview question first ‘cuz I can’t think of anything to put in the persuasive so here it is :
My favourite subject in school would be coding because the way you design and code things all follow an interesting flow. It intriguing how all of the parts of the code just snap together and work to create something fully functional such as a portal or a shop system. I like how the creativity of ideas can help create big popular games and that each part has to be tweaked in just the right way. The way people have designed their games are amazing. They all tell stories about the past, fiction and informative. One of my favourite parts of coding is the fact that you can make anything come true. Whether that is simply making a water fountain, or making a whole universal hit game. I love coding because it is the future of our civilisation. Some time in the future the world will be fully automated. The one thing behind all that automation is coding.
FEEDBACK
Jessica Xie
Why Systemic Changes are More Important in Addressing Climate Change
Climate change is perhaps the most pressing issue of our time, posing significant risks to ecosystems, economies, and human health. The raging debate over whether systemic changes or individual changes has ignited a fiery flame of competition. Though individual changes may be accounted as valuable, systemic changes have proved to be more effective overall.
Individual actions are doing things by yourself, such as personally recycling, reusing or other ways to stop carbon. This does not have a very large impact and can lead to people questioning themselves whether this is worth it. Working only by yourself does not help at all, because there are still other people using carbon, so this is not a good choice.
Systemic changes are collective efforts, such as altering policies, making new rules and creating a fine for littering. These are more valuable because they cause a larger impact through a whole community, except for just one person, so there is more help. They are crucial because they will be more effective in fighting climate change.
One of the reasons why systemic changes are more useful in fighting climate change is because it can cause a larger impact. This form of change is critical because it offers society a way to solve big, important problems by addressing their root causes. This can create a better overall result rather than just one person doing it all by themselves.
Systemic changes also play a critical role in ensuring equitable solutions to climate change. Climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable communities, and addressing these disparities requires systemic interventions. Policies that promote climate justice, invest in renewable energy infrastructure, and support adaptation efforts in disadvantaged areas can mitigate the unequal impacts of climate change. Individual actions are less likely to address these structural inequalities effectively.
In conclusion, while individual actions are valuable for raising awareness and fostering a culture of sustainability, systemic changes are more crucial in addressing climate change. To effectively combat climate change and create a sustainable future, prioritising systemic changes is important.
FEEDBACK
huashang66
Please find my writng homework as attached.
Why Systematic Change is Crucial for Addressing Climate Change
FEEDBACK
_ran.d.f.chen
The Urgency of Systemic Change in Addressing Climate Change
Climate change poses one of the most significant threats to our planet, manifesting in rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems. While individual actions, such as reducing plastic use or adopting a plant-based diet, are commendable and can foster awareness, it is systemic change that ultimately holds the key to effectively combating this global crisis. A collective shift in policies, economic structures, and social norms is essential to create the lasting impact necessary for a sustainable future.
To begin with, the scale of the climate crisis demands solutions that extend beyond personal choices. While individual actions can contribute to a cultural shift and may inspire others, they often lack the substantial impact needed to effect meaningful change. According to a 2021 report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), major greenhouse gas emissions come from large industries, transportation sectors, and energy production, rather than from household practices. Thus, without systemic interventions that target these larger contributors, individual efforts risk being overshadowed by the sheer volume of emissions generated by corporations and governments.
Moreover, systemic changes can create an environment that facilitates and incentives individual actions. For instance, comprehensive legislation aimed at reducing carbon emissions, such as the Green New Deal, has the potential to reshape energy production, enhance public transportation, and invest in renewable resources. By making sustainable options more accessible and affordable, individuals are empowered to make choices that align with their values. When electric vehicles are readily available and affordable, when public transport is efficient and widespread, and when renewable energy sources are prioritized, the barriers that currently hinder individual actions are removed, leading to a more substantial collective impact.
Additionally, the interconnected nature of global economies and industries means that climate change cannot be addressed in isolation. For instance, multinational corporations often exploit lax environmental regulations in certain countries, contributing significantly to global emissions. Systemic changes at the international level, such as agreements like the Paris Accord, are necessary to hold these corporations accountable and promote equitable practices worldwide. Individual actions may inspire local change, but systemic reforms are required to address the root causes of climate change and ensure that all nations work together toward a common goal.
Finally, history has shown us that transformative change often requires collective action and policy reform. The civil rights movement, for example, was propelled by systemic changes that established legal frameworks for equality and justice, showcasing how individual efforts can lead to monumental shifts when supported by institutional changes. Similarly, addressing climate change will require a reimagining of our economic models, energy systems, and social contracts, pushing for innovation and resilience in the face of environmental degradation.
In conclusion, while individual actions are valuable for raising awareness and fostering a culture of sustainability, it is systemic change that is crucial for effectively addressing climate change. By targeting the root causes of emissions, creating a supportive infrastructure for sustainable choices, and fostering global cooperation, we can enact the transformative changes necessary to secure a livable planet for future generations. Only through systemic reform can we hope to mobilise the collective effort required to confront one of the most pressing challenges of our time.
FEEDBACK
Han Mu
W9
Interview Question: What is your favourite subject, and why? (200 words)
My favourite subject is maths because it challenges me to think critically and solve problems logically. I enjoy how maths provides clear solutions to complex questions, and there’s a sense of satisfaction when I work through a difficult problem and find the right answer. Maths is also incredibly versatile and applicable in everyday life, whether calculating measurements, understanding data, or even planning strategies in games.
One of the things I love most about maths is its structured nature. Every concept builds on the previous one, and the logic behind it makes everything fit together seamlessly. It’s like solving a puzzle, where each piece is a new formula or theorem that helps make sense of the bigger picture. I find that very rewarding.
Maths is also essential for many future career paths, especially in science, technology, and engineering. Knowing this motivates me even more, as I feel that by mastering maths, I’m building a strong foundation for whatever field I choose to pursue. Whether it’s algebra, geometry, or problem-solving, maths always keeps me engaged and pushes me to improve, which is why it’s my favourite subject.
In the face of the climate crisis, a pressing question arises: should we prioritise individual actions or systemic changes to combat climate change effectively? The stakes are high, as climate change threatens ecosystems, economies, and human lives worldwide. While individual actions play an important role, systemic changes are far more crucial to achieving the large-scale, long-term solutions necessary to mitigate this global issue. Systemic changes have the power to drive broad, lasting impact, whereas individual efforts, while valuable, are limited in their scope and ability to address the root causes of climate change.
Individual actions, such as reducing personal energy consumption, recycling, or adopting plant-based diets, are often promoted as ways to reduce one’s carbon footprint. These actions are certainly beneficial and can help cultivate a culture of environmental responsibility. However, the impact of individual efforts is relatively small in the grand scheme of things. A person using energy-efficient appliances or opting to cycle instead of drive makes a positive contribution, but that contribution is minuscule compared to the scale of global carbon emissions. Without structural changes, these personal choices are insufficient to address the enormity of the climate crisis.
In focusing on individual actions, there is also a risk of diverting attention away from the more significant contributors to climate change. For instance, research has shown that a small number of large corporations are responsible for the vast majority of global greenhouse gas emissions. According to a 2017 report from the Carbon Disclosure Project, just 100 companies are accountable for 71% of global emissions. Individuals, no matter how conscientious, do not have the power to regulate these emissions or overhaul industrial practices. Systemic changes, on the other hand, can target the root of the problem by regulating these industries, setting policies that reduce emissions, and investing in renewable energy on a massive scale.
Systemic changes hold the key to meaningful progress because they have the potential to drive widespread transformation. Government policies, corporate reforms, and technological advancements can collectively shift entire societies towards more sustainable practices. For example, the adoption of renewable energy targets, electric vehicle infrastructure, and carbon pricing can significantly reduce national and global emissions. Countries that prioritise investment in renewable energy sources like wind and solar power are better positioned to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, which are the primary drivers of climate change.
Moreover, systemic changes encourage innovation that can help mitigate climate change in ways individual efforts cannot. Technological advancements, such as carbon capture and storage, improvements in renewable energy efficiency, and the development of sustainable agricultural practices, require large-scale investment from governments and corporations. These innovations can then make environmentally friendly choices more accessible to individuals, amplifying the impact of personal actions. Systemic changes also ensure that the burden of addressing climate change does not fall unfairly on individuals, particularly those who may not have the financial means to make greener choices.
While systemic change is undoubtedly more important, individual actions still have a role to play. Personal choices, such as reducing waste, adopting sustainable diets, and supporting eco-friendly businesses, create public demand for systemic reform. When individuals make environmentally conscious decisions, they signal to companies and policymakers that sustainability is a priority. This public demand can push governments to enact stricter environmental regulations and encourage corporations to adopt greener business practices. Thus, individual actions can complement and drive systemic changes.
In conclusion, while both individual actions and systemic changes are necessary in the fight against climate change, systemic changes are more crucial because they offer the large-scale, long-term solutions needed to address the problem at its core. Governments and corporations must take responsibility for enacting policies, regulations, and innovations that reduce global emissions and transform industries. Individual actions, while important, are most effective when they support and align with these broader systemic efforts. Only by addressing climate change at both levels can we hope to mitigate its worst effects and secure a sustainable future for the planet.
FEEDBACK
Ella Yang (1)
Here’s my HW!
The Essential Role of Systemic Changes in halting Climate Change
Climate change may very well be the most alarming issue in our time, from damaging ecosystems to eventually destroying our homes. The ongoing debate about whether individual actions or systemic changes are more crucial in stopping the global crisis has been rallying ever since this problem was discovered. While individual changes are valuable and seen as considerable efforts, the overall impact of systemic change is proven to have a bigger effect on stopping climate change.
Individual actions, like recycling and saving energy are important to raise awareness and lower the carbon footprint of many families and communities, potentially inspiring further actions. However, in the grand scheme of things, relying solely on simply individual efforts is not enough to deal with this pressing issue. For example, a community on the coast of Queensland is making sure no rubbish gets in their waterways, making that part of the world cleaner and safer, yet in the Maldives, islands are rapidly sinking from the rise of the water levels, the tourist destination said to be 89% uninhabitable by the deadline of 2050, in which the individual efforts of the Australians have no impact. The impact of this individual change, however beneficial, is nothing compared to the transformative power of systemic changes.
Systemic changes refer to alterations in policies, regulations, and laws, and they’re crucial because they have the power to alone enact broad impacts that individual efforts cannot achieve. These changes involve government regulations, enforced sustainability practices, and even international agreements and treaties, with the power to bind many countries under many laws.
One of the most agreeable advantages systemic changes bring are the power to achieve large-scale reductions in the greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon pricing methods, such as CO2 taxes or cap-and-trade systems can further encourage firms and corporate businesses to significantly decrease their emissions. Such laws hold the power to establish economic conditions that lean towards green technology innovation and renewable energy. Individual efforts, while reducing minor emissions, do nothing towards the large scale industrial practices stay intact.
Furthermore, systemic adjustments can properly address the underlying cause of climate change by enforcing aggressive yet effective rules and protocols throughout major sectors. For example, The Paris Agreement, a treaty signed by 190 countries, is an example of a multinational effort to limit global temperature rise by setting clear guidelines. This is just one example of many treaties and agreements signed to battle the surge of temperature rise and climate change.
In conclusion, systemic changes have proven to have a considerably large effect on many nations rather than individual efforts. Individual actions are important to keep many communities safe and inspire many others to stand up and do the right thing for our planet, it is imperative to prioritise systemic reforms in order to effectively address climate change and create a sustainable future.
FEEDBACK
drradhikabhatla@gmail.com
Are individual actions or systemic changes more crucial to addressing climate change?
Picture this, it is two thousand one hundred and there are only a hundred species of animals left in the world. You want people to start to help to protect the world but not enough people care about it. This may sound very exaggerated but this could actually be a potential future if people do not change their ways soon. This is just one of the reasons that systemic changes are more crucial to addressing the environment than individual actions. Here are some reasons to think this, not enough people acting, many people do not care and laws enforce things well.
Firstly, systemic changes are definitely more crucial to addressing climate change than individual actions because individual actions are not big enough. What I mean by this is that individual actions do not change the world as they are too small, the individual actions just do not make a difference. In fact a recent study from a scientist named John Der showed that there has never been a significant change in the environment caused by individual actions. This just goes to show that individual actions do not make a difference when it comes to the whole world.
Secondly, systemic changes are one hundred percent more crucial to addressing climate change than individual actions because many people just do not want to do anything. This is because many of the people in the world just do not care about the environment and do not do any individual actions to help. They even sometimes do things that are negative to the world. An example of this is littering, many people litter as they do not care about the environment enough. They do not seem to understand that climate change will not only affect some people, it will affect everyone. So surely systemic changes are better for the environment than individual actions.
Lastly, systemic changes are certainly more important than individual actions as laws enforce actions. One great example of systemic changes are laws, they are like rules. So when laws are put up about climate changes people are forced to follow. This is because sometimes when there are no laws about something then people will just not do it. For example if there was no law about not littering then many people would most likely be throwing rubbish on the floor. This is just like how many people would not be caring about the environment and air if there were no laws about it. In fact a recent study from the university of NSW showed that eighty percent of factory companies would still be producing mass amounts of pollution in the air if it was not for the law which did not allow it.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that systemic changes are more important than individual actions. There are many reasons for this. The ones that have been stated are that individual actions are too diminutive, most people do make the choice to act themselves and laws make sure that people help. It is easy to see that systemic changes are the best way to make sure that the world of tomorrow will not be like the example in the first paragraph.
What is your favourite subject, and why?
My favourite subject is maths. There are many reasons why maths is my favourite subject. I like how maths can be used in everyday life. For example, sometimes when you go to the shop you might need to check that the machine calculated the total amount of money you spent on your shopping correctly. Once I had just finished eating a meal and I calculated how much it would cost to pay. When I saw the bill I realised that the amount to be paid was ten dollars over! So it was lucky that I had checked and it also showed me how maths can be very important in everyday life. I also like how in maths there is an answer to every equation and a solution to every problem. This is sometimes very different from real life where many questions may lie unanswered. A role model I have is Isaac Newton because he showed the world the importance of maths. One of his important discoveries was gravity. He uncovered this when an apple fell on his head and he wondered why the apple fell down, not up. This discovery changed many different scientific topics and it showed that maths was really entwined with many other subjects. These are all the reasons why I believe that maths is my favourite subject.
FEEDBACK
maggiesmchan
Here’s my homework:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dkWB-Xxm1usmwbVGgs5aVO11CsgVQRfAySy7afYNBs0/edit
FEEDBACK
_B H
As the climate crisis intensifies, conversations about solutions often centre on individual actions: recycling, reducing meat consumption, or using public transportation. While these actions are important, they can distract from a critical truth: systemic changes are far more crucial in effectively addressing climate change. Without transformative shifts in policies, industry practices, and societal norms, individual efforts will remain mere drops in an ocean of need.
First, consider the scale of the dilemma. Climate change is a global phenomenon that requires comprehensive, large-scale interventions. According to the IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) , the world must drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions to avert catastrophic consequences. This necessitates not just changes in personal behaviour, but robust policies that limit emissions at the source—namely, from industries that produce the bulk of global emissions. For instance, the energy sector, which is responsible for over 70% of emissions, must transition to renewable sources like wind and solar. Such changes are beyond the capacity of individual actions; they require government regulations, corporate accountability, and international cooperation.
Moreover, the current economic structure often perpetuates environmentally damaging practices. The fossil fuel industry continues to receive substantial subsidies, incentivising continued extraction and consumption of fossil fuels. While an individual might choose to drive less, the systemic pressures to rely on fossil fuels for energy and transportation render these choices less impactful. By advocating for systemic changes—like eliminating fossil fuel subsidies and investing in sustainable infrastructure—we can create an environment where individual actions are supported and amplified. The goal is not just to change behavior, but to create a framework where sustainable choices become the easiest and most affordable options.
Additionally, systemic change addresses social inequities that individual actions cannot. Many communities, particularly marginalised ones, bear the brunt of climate change impacts despite contributing the least to the problem. These communities often lack access to the resources necessary to make sustainable choices, such as electric vehicles or energy-efficient homes. Systemic solutions, such as equitable policies that ensure access to clean energy and sustainable practices, are essential to creating a just response to the climate crisis. By prioritissing systemic change, we can ensure that all communities have the means to adapt to and mitigate climate impacts, leading to a more inclusive and effective approach.
Furthermore, the urgency of the climate crisis demands immediate action on a large scale. Individual actions, while valuable, often operate within a context of limited impact. The clock is ticking, and we must act decisively. Systemic changes can lead to rapid, widespread adoption of sustainable practices. For example, when countries commit to ambitious climate targets through legislation, they can mobilise resources, technologies, and innovations that individuals alone cannot achieve. This collective effort amplifies the impact of individual actions, creating a virtuous cycle of sustainability.
In conclusion, while individual actions are commendable and necessary, they must not be the focal point of our climate response. Systemic change is paramount in addressing the climate crisis effectively and equitably. By advocating for policies that transform industries, promote social justice, and incentivise sustainable practices, we can harness the collective power needed to combat climate change. It is time to shift our focus from individual actions to systemic solutions, ensuring a sustainable future for all.
(I did research)
FEEDBACK
yuezhu-xuehotmail-com
Homework:
Wk9 writing Homework
FEEDBACK
Nandu
Climate change is one of humanity’s most pressing dilemmas, perhaps the biggest of our time. It poses severe long-term harm to both our society and the planet, its pernicious habits typically make it hard to notice until it’s already thriving in our economy. It serves to both poison us slowly with unsuspecting, yet perilous microplastics and it also chips down on our atmosphere – specifically the ozone layer, causing our planet to heat up. This causes rising sea levels capable of engulfing treasured islands such as the Maldives, Fiji and The Bahamas. If we don’t do something about it soon, our effects may be irreparable. This brings us to an inevitable clash; Are systemic changes, or individual changes more effective in battling climate change?
These two can both have positive effects, but as they are delved deeper into, it is clear that systemic changes will benefit our environment the most. First and foremost, individual changes may be good for raising social awareness without government control which is excellent at saving money and building useful habits. But when you factor in human behaviour, we tend to stray from our goals. After all, we were the ones who started this problem in the first place. Not only that but there must be a wide scale amount of people participating in this, otherwise our efforts will be to no avail. It may benefit a neighbourhood or two, but still, even if we do abide by these rules even simple activities, such as travelling, which seem unabolishable pollute our planet and changing from plastic to paper or cardboard may not appeal to many. But on the contrary, systemic changes can almost guarantee a high scale of impact with the whole country as a stakeholder. These changes have proven to be useful, as displayed by the ban on single-use plastics in Australia. Plastic packaging (in Australia and globally), as surmised, occupies 60% of all Australian litter and 40% of all plastic pollution and waste. The ban, as estimated by the Clean Up Australia council, will prevent 2.7 billion items from entering landfills all around Australia in the next 20 years. A common misconception is that citizens will riot against seemingly ‘totalitarian’ acts that restrict their freedom – such as banning plastic – and feel pressured to leave the country in pursuit of a more indifferent country. Needless to say, this is a minor issue. As we can see, many people are rioting for quite the opposite: they riot for climate change, movement and action. On the 20th of September 2024, around 4 million people gathered to protest climate change, and this is one of many massive climate strikes. Not only that, but 86% of Australians reckoned that the plastic ban was “very important”. This doesn’t imply that the remaining 14% despise it.
Now that the case is open, we can clearly deduce that systemic changes will most of the time, if not always have a better scale and depth of impact – incorporating more stakeholders and implementing more monumentous changes and laws compared to individual changes. Still, systemic changes by themselves may not be the full picture, but perhaps, if we obey both systemic changes and individual changes, will this problem be resolved. In culmination, the ideal model would be to have a healthy dose of BOTH of these in our day to day lives, but when they stand side by side – we can see that systemic changes are plainly far greater than that of individual changes
FEEDBACK
Benjamin Yang
Which will have a larger impact on society? Individual actions or systemic changes? And how can we secure our future without climate change? If we need to keep our civilisation alive, we all need to help defeat climate change. Right now, climate change is destroying our coral reefs and forests. We need to stop this tomfoolery instantly as it is infecting everything that lives in coral reefs and forests with the fear of not having a safe place to live.
So which is better? Individual actions or systemic changes? Usually systemic acts are better to make a large change. This means we need a systemic act to defeat climate change. What systemic act you ask? Well we can firstly reduce our carbon emissions by turning all our energy production services in to electric consuming machines. Turning all of our production services into electric will have one of the largest impact on climate change. This is because 80% of our earth’s energy production is powered by fossil fuels.
We also need more systemic changes though. The results of the last change can make a drastic impact on the world, in a good way I mean. The next thing we need to do is make littering a complete ban. This means that if you litter you will either be put on fines of high prices or, possibly go to jail. If this works out each and every corner of the streets you walk on would be spotless, no rubbish at all! Nope, nada, zilch! This will make yet another large change for our beloved earth. Another big one. Now it seems like the systemic change has already taken over as a way to protect our environment but individual changes can also help, such as cleaning your backyard each day, going to return and earn depots and simply not doing things that you think will hurt the environment.
In my opinion, systemic acts are more powerful, inclusive and strong. If we pull off all of the things we need to do in a systemic way, we can make the entire earth a better place, and possibly even the future planets we will settle on. All of this is a lesson that us, humans, will eventually learn and put into action.
FEEDBACK
Jessica Xie (1)
Systemic Change’s Part in Opposing Climate Change
Rebecca Lindsey, an esteemed climate change researcher casts her finger at an anomalous graph. The line exaggerates. “This line is revealing the growth of devious climate change” Rebecca Lindsey announced to the inquisitive audience. The audience gasps in dismay. Their gleeful smiles evolve into perturbated frowns. “Which one is helping more to put an end to this catastrophe, the public or systemic change?” A roar of chatter engulfs the room, people debating about which one is more efficient. Although it is sublime that the public are zealous to aid our beloved ecosystem, systemic change is more coherent.
The public are expediting our helpless earth. They wish that all of the vivid, emerald greenery would be restored. According to United Nations Development Programme, around eighty percent of the population of earth is helping combat this vile titan. Unfortunately, this colossal number still does not have an effect on demolishing brutal climate change. Furthermore, the ways the public try to stop climate change are not beneficial and do not support defeating climate change too heavily. Hence, even though the public are adjudicating illustrious, it does not affect the earth as much as systemic change does.
Carbon footprint is the release of how much carbon dioxide is released from an individual or a group of people. Carbon Dioxide affects the earth’s atmosphere, by heating it up and making it scorching hot. These heat waves waltz towards earth, and so contributes to climate change’s rein of trepidation. Cars using petrol, meat and dairy are examples of daily used items that contribute to climate change. Carbon footprint is getting reduced all over the world. Systemic change is crucial in this cause because, governments have the chance to ban certain foods or types of vehicles. For example, the country China will be banning petrol cars by 2030.
Moreover, another thing that systemic change can execute is the power to control markets. Government can make mitigation occur by making sure that everyone only uses renewable energy by making it compulsory. This is something the public could never perform. Renewable energy is infinite and does not attack the enviroment. Non renewable energy emits green house gases, while not being immortal. This is why systemic change plays an essential role in developing a nation that uses greenhouse gases.
In conclusion, I would like to state that while the public are yearning to help in the revolution of reviving nature to start seeing jolly pink flowers bloom, to see trees dance in the whistling wind and to thrive with these stupendous goods, systemic change has a higher chance of achieving this goal. Unlike the public, who complete insignificant deeds, systemic change fulfils quests that favour our planet in many ways. Thus, systemic change is more auxiliary than individual actions.
FEEDBACK
Bhupender _ (1)
Systemic Change’s Part in Opposing Climate Change
We all might remember, back in 2019, when a huge bushfire erupted, nearly killing 3 billion of our animals. The government sent out nearly all of our firefighters to set the fires out, while members of the public volunteered and also helped. So which one is better for climate change?
Firstly, I’ll talk about the government. They are allowed to make systemic changes, which are changes to the law to either restrict and/or help. There are many different advantages to the government. Being able to change things that are big or small, have control of pretty everything and much much more. They can help, by putting a fine for littering, and doing things that are not sustainable. However this can lead to multiple problems. These consist of having too much fame and not making the right decisions, like putting a too cheap fine for anyone to care, and even overlook the sustainability issue. These could also easily be avoided by consistently making sure that the people in charge are still worthy.
Secondly, I’ll look at the other side, the public. They can do something called individual actions. These are if you recycle a lot and make sure everything is reused until they are completely ruined. These actions can not stop, but slow the climate change rate, by not doing anything unsustainable, and encouraging people to be sustainable too. They also can group together and make a better team than the government.
Lastly, let’s balance and weigh the different options. Firstly, are the points, though the public can do some things that definitely are better than the government, like grouping together, most of the other points go to the government side. Also, the government normally overrules them anyway.
Therefore, I personally think that the government can do better things with climate change.
FEEDBACK
grace.creek
HERE’S MY HOMEWORK FOR WEEK 9
Homework:
Write a persuasive essay arguing whether individual actions or systemic changes are more crucial in addressing climate change. (500 Words)
Interview Question: What is your favourite subject, and why? (200 words)
Persuasive essay:
Global warming is one of the biggest, and most pressuring hardships that Earth has faced, posing significant risks to ecosystems, human health and the environment. The raging debate over whether systemic changes or individual changes will give a bigger impact towards global warming continues. Which one is better? Individual changes may impact it, but systematic changes make an even bigger impact. Why is that?
The significant impact of policies and treaties are some of the main things that contribute towards climate change. Except not in a bad way. Many treaties have encouraged countries to carbon neutrality goals and embrace net zero targets and much, much more. For example, the Paris agreement achieved momentous success as they convinced some countries like Japan, China, and the EU to set carbon neutrality goals and embrace net zero targets. Some systematic changes like this made a big impact on climate change and made progress in climate change mitigation. Only some small systematic changes contribute much, much more than individual changes and with more change to come, we can make so much more progress in climate change mitigation.
Except, there are still many big individual actions that we can do. Why are systematic changes still the better way to go?
Some people say that individual changes can be quite significant like how all us individuals recycle, and we have clean up Australia day especially for this. Yes, those are ways to contribute to climate change and make it less severe, but those are only miner solutions. There are much bigger changes that can only happen we make systematic changes. Individual responsibility can sometimes be quite hard to rely on whereas if we make legal enforcements then no one can argue and just not do it. Making legal enforcements make us change and make us do things differently for the better. Individual responsibility can be good, but out of everyone in the world, it will be hard to make a difference if not everyone contributes.
Individual actions can sometimes be people doing out of their heart or their forced to do it. Except most of the time, it’s the systematic changes that influence our individual actions. Making all these policies and treaties, making legal enforcements. People don’t just do these things because they’re forcing us to do things that we don’t want to do. Instead, they want to inspire and help us in the fight with climate change. All these systematic change are for the better, and if we accomplish some of these changes then were one step closer to defeating climate change.
In conclusion, we need both individual and systematic changes if we want to be on step ahead in the fight with climate change. Although if we make more systematic changes, it will bring us even further towards the end. Governments and corporations must contribute as well, otherwise the fight will never end. Climate change will tear down our futures and reck the ecosystems. We must act now, otherwise it will be too late.
Interview question answer:
My favourite subject is maths because it challenges me to think critically and solve problems logically. I love the satisfaction of solving a previously unsolvable problem. One of the things I love most about maths is its structured nature. How everything ties in with the real world, the calculations, the problem solving. It all intersects with the real world. Every concept in maths ties in seamlessly with the next. Every problem has it’s meaning. Every problem has more then one easy calculation and sum to it. Whether it’s addition, subtraction, fraction or decimals, it’s like solving a puzzle, where each piece is a new formula that helps make sense of the bigger image.
Maths also helps you a lot for when you have a job. You don’t even realise it. When you’re measuring the size and angles of things, if you’re an engineer, anything really. Maths helps you during it. By mastering maths, it would help me a lot for when I’m older, when I’m in class. Maths is always around you, when you look up at skyscrapers, the formulas and theories surround you. Maths is engaging and you feel so happy when you solve a problem. That is why maths is my favourite subject.
FEEDBACK
Annabelle Tung
You are going for a morning stroll and beside you are people from the community picking up rubbish and planting trees in their backyard. Sadly, most places in this area do not look like this. Instead, you see people littering and smoking. But there are some people out there who really care for our environment and want to protect it while others are destroying it. That is why our individual actions need to change to sustain our healthy planet.
Currently, there are many individuals who have done small things to help save our environment. Some include planting more trees, and volunteering to pick up rubbish, or using renewable energy. These small actions can still contribute to a cleaner planet.
Firstly, I believe that individual actions are more crucial when addressing climate change because some small actions that individuals do can still contribute to saving the planet. For example, people can pick up some rubbish, use renewable energy and plant some trees. If multiple people can do this, they will contribute to a healthier planet. Imagine if every single Australian picked up a piece of rubbish every day? That would be over 26 million pieces of rubbish picked up every day and disposed of properly. Our world is made up of many individuals, and we can all make a significant difference if we work together.
Secondly, It is imperative that individual actions are more crucial when addressing climate change because the corporations are made up of individuals. If the individuals change, then will the corporations because corporporations are made up of individuals. Without individuals, there wouldn’t even be any companies.
To conclude, it is vitally important that individual actions are more crucial when addressing climate change because small actions can make a big difference and corporations are made up of individuals. If you are an individual that wants to help our enviroment, plant a tree, or pick up some rubbish, because remember that one small action can lead to a great outcome on our planet.
Kobe
FEEDBACK
Kobe
Climate change is a critical issue facing our planet. The debate on the most effective approach to addressing this crisis is increasingly polarized. This essay explores the argument that systemic changes are more crucial than individual actions in tackling climate change.
The historical context of climate change shows growing scientific consensus and increasing public awareness. Scientists have warned about human-induced global warming since the 1950s, but widespread attention only came in the late 20th century. Influential figures such as James Hansen and Al Gore have raised awareness and pushed for policy changes.
Despite efforts, the pace of change has been slow, and the impact of individual actions limited. While important, actions like recycling and reducing energy consumption are not enough to address the scale and complexity of the climate crisis. Systemic changes, such as government policies and international agreements, are necessary to drive large-scale transformations.
One key argument in favor of systemic changes is the need for coordinated, global action. Climate change requires a global solution, and individual actions often lack the collective impact needed. Systemic changes, like the Paris Agreement, have the potential to bring nations, industries, and communities together.
Systemic changes can also address the root causes of climate change, such as the reliance on fossil fuels and inefficient resource use. By implementing policies that incentivize sustainable practices and regulate emissions, governments and corporations can drive necessary transformations at a scale that individual actions cannot achieve.
Another crucial aspect of systemic changes is the ability to hold large-scale emitters accountable. While individual actions can contribute to reducing emissions, the majority of greenhouse gas emissions come from a small number of industries and countries. Systemic changes can create the necessary frameworks to hold these major contributors responsible.
To wrap up, systematic changes clearly have a more significant impact on global warming than individual actions, as they are co-ordinated, global, can adress root causes of climate change and hold large-scale polluters to account. Individual actions cannot have such big of an impact, therefore systematic changes are more important.
FEEDBACK
Mei Li
My HW
Scholarly Writing T3 W9 HW
FEEDBACK
Ting Zhang (1)
Week Nine Writing Homework
As climate change and global warming steadily increasing in the modern era, we are being pushed by our world to create a solution for our actions. Along with this, the debate over who is responsible for what intensifies, questioning beliefs of many. Is it really accurate that one person can make a colossal difference? Well, the significant impact of policies and treaties on a global scale is seen much more consequential that just some people attempting to reduce their global footprint. Individual recycling and “Clean Up Australia Day” are only minor solutions to this big problem- not everyone partakes in these activities and just a handful of people can’t really make a difference. However, systemic changes actually influence every individual’s actions, causing more people to help to halt or at least slow climate change.
Currently statistics record an eight to nine inch rise in sea levels, and estimated ten to twelve inches of increased water levels in the next thirty years, meaning that the levels are accelerating alarmingly. Think of the beaches of Bali. Filthy, dirty and covered with a blanket of plastic waste. Think of Thailand’s recent heat waves, measuring record high temperatures due to global warming. A few families attempting to reduce their global footprint won’t fix these issues. But the government can. Just by simply implementing a law in which restrains the amount of carbon emissions produced by factories will do wonders. When you check the carbon emissions levels once again, it’ll be a miracle when eyeing the lowered rates of emissions coming from the manufacturing sector of the globe.
In addition, if you as an individual decide to be vegan, to recycle, to reuse, to cycle, to use renewable energy, you would see that your personal carbon footprint is low. But look again at the global emissions- doing those tasks will do nothing to the global numbers. Individual action isn’t the whole solution. Those efforts form a small percentage, not enough to outdo huge corporations and the bulk of population. It can’t compete against the greenhouse gases produced by factories, which is responsible for twelve percent of the U.S carbon emissions.
Furthermore, legal enforcement is much more secure than individual responsibility. Let’s say that there were absolutely no punishments for speeding. It’s wrong, but it’s not that bad of a crime, so although you definitely wouldn’t do it often, you’d speed once in a while in certain circumstances. It’s like climate action. You don’t have to do anything about it, but it’s moral to do something, yet many don’t take action. Remember China’s EV Policy? It made a ban on petroleum cars, which achieved a carbon neutrality from pollution. This would be more effective than just some people bothering to change to an electric vehicle.
In conclusion, with our aid our world can evolve into a fresh, sustainable world, eliminating chances of marine life consuming plastic and reducing the threat of natural disasters. It’s just the way we do it that matters. The individual choices of people can do something, but not something that will really be seen. Systemic changes are just ultimately more efficient and effective, creating fast progress and swiftly decreasing percentages of global warming.
FEEDBACK
Olivia Chen (1)
Writing Homework
Scholarly W9
FEEDBACK
oliverzhang (1)
Scholarly Writing Wk 9
Climate Change has become a pressing issue of our modern day society with serious consequences for ecosystems, the economy, and human health. It has become embedded into our society and can’t be ignored. Every drop of fuel counts from fuel hungry cars that soak in every single kilometre. Then you see desperate families going to net zero making change but then all of that effort wasted in vain as huge corporations destroying all of that by using all of these fossil fuels. Individual action isn’t enough. We need systemic actions to help stop this pressing matter as the Earth has been pushed to the limits begging us to stop but we play this risky game of environmental roulette and hope we will be the ones to make it out.
Systemic changes are crucial. This includes implementing and enforcing stricter environmental regulations, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and investing in sustainable infrastructure. Governments and corporations must take the lead by setting ambitious targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adopting cleaner technologies. Furthermore, international cooperation is essential. Climate change is a global issue that transcends borders, requiring countries to work together to achieve meaningful progress. Agreements like the Paris Agreement are steps in the right direction, but they need to be backed by solid concrete actions and accountability. Public awareness and education also will play a vital role. By understanding the gravity of the situation, people can advocate for policies that prioritise the planet’s health. This collective effort can drive the systemic changes needed to mitigate climate change and protect our environment for future generations.
While individual actions are commendable and necessary, they alone cannot counterbalance the extensive environmental impact caused by large-scale industrial activities. Systemic changes are crucial. This includes implementing and enforcing stricter environmental regulations, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and investing in sustainable infrastructure. Governments and corporations must take the lead by setting ambitious targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adopting cleaner technologies.
Moreover, international cooperation is essential. Climate change is a global issue that transcends borders, requiring countries to work together to achieve meaningful progress. Agreements like the Paris Accord are steps in the right direction, but they need to be backed by concrete actions and accountability. Public awareness and education also play a vital role. By understanding the gravity of the situation, people can advocate for policies that prioritise the planet’s health. This collective effort can drive the systemic changes needed to mitigate climate change and protect our environment for future generations. By promoting systematic changes we can transcend above this pressing matter of climate change!
FEEDBACK
Phuong Nguyen
I am done. This is my homework:
Systematic Change and how it will revolutionise the world
FEEDBACK
tracyz0104@gmail.com (1)
This is my homework. Sorry a bit late.
Week 9 Writing Homework
FEEDBACK
Damon Yuan
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BajvQOAWJKkGziz3lgP-FYiBYTwUWQBWpnOwt1EuAaU/edit?usp=sharing
FEEDBACK
Angus