Week 7 Writing Homework
- November 27, 2024
- 7:25 pm
- 47 Comments
Writing Homework :
Topic: Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
Interview Questions:
1. What are your academic strengths and weaknesses?
2. Can you describe a challenging situation you’ve faced and how you handled it?
3. What are your long-term career aspirations, and how will this scholarship help you achieve them?
Pobble365: https://www.pobble.com//
Submit your homework as comment below:
Please upload your homework as a comment below:
47 thoughts on “Week 7 Writing Homework”
Week 7 Writing Homework
Topic: Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
IMAGINE A MODERNISED WORLD BRIMMING WITH JUBILANT CROWDS OF PEOPLE CHEERING UNDER THE GLISTENING SKYSCRAPERS THAT GLINTED IN THE WARM SUNLIGHT, GRACING THE ONCE IMPOVERISHED SKYLINE, A UTOPIA OF PROSPERITY PULSING WITH SUBLIME ENERGY, THE VERY EMBODIMENT OF TRUE METROPOLITAN PARADISE, THE PARIS OF THE EAST.
Countries pursuing modernisation should follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a role model, despite the extreme social and cultural changes. I believe this because it will benefit the economic wellbeing of the local community, support cultural preservation even more and also ensure the country has a future to look towards.
FIRST OF ALL, PRIORITISING THE RAPID GROWTH OF THE ECONOMY WILL reap many benefits for the local people, especially the economic wellbeing. Prioritising parts of the economy like tourism can make unemployment at an all time low because of the many new jobs available, while improving the economy spontaneously. This is not hypothetical, it has happened before. During Covid-19, the people in Hawaii suffered the most. Do you know why? This was because of the tourism industry breaking down as no one could travel anymore due to lockdown. This meant many Hawaiins lost their jobs, so unemployment was at an all time high. Hawaii’s tourism industry has escalated very quickly and has improved the local community’s lives because of the many jobs available in the industry, which also benefited the economy greatly.
ALTHOUGH YOU MAY THINK THAT MAKING RAPID GROWTH A NO.1 PRIORITY will destroy the cultural preservation of the country. This is a very extreme fallacy because the money produced by the economy will support cultural preservation more than ever, through memorials, museums and local centres. Tourists could also learn the ancient culture of the country by visiting. Thailand provides the ideal example for this. Thailand’s Muay Thai, a traditional martial arts practice, came almost lost from history to having 600000 people practice it, WORLDWIDE. It is now internationally recognised, but how has all of this happened? When Thailand began prioritising its tourism industry, many tourists flocked from all over the world to learn, practice and master the art. This has resurrected Muay Thai through tourism, preserving the ancient art.
FOCUSING ON THE RAPID GROWTH OF THE ECONOMY WILL ENSURE A FUTURE for the country. The economy’s profit will make certain the preservation of the country’s culture. Also, GDP leads to greater healthcare, educational outcomes, better political stability, healthier lifestyle and many other benefits. This will make sure that this country will be remembered, not fading away into history as the clock keeps ticking.
ULTIMATELY, DEVELOPING NATIONS SHOULD PRIORITISE RAPID GROWTH OF THE ECONOMY TO DEVELOP THEMSELVES WHICH WILL BENEFIT THEM THROUGH TOURISM, CULTURAL PRESERVATION, GOOD ECONOMIC WELLBEING OF THE LOCAL PEOPLE AND A FUTURE TO WORK TOWARDS.
FEEDBACK
B H – FEEDBACK
this is my homework.
Ethan Lee’s Week Seven Writing
Topic: Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
Remember Japan? Before the war, their civilisation was growing, thriving, rising to become the world’s most successful country. Should we follow the very footsteps of Japan? Even though we produce mass pollution and climate change? Or should we keep out ways and continue on a sturdy, straight plank of wood. I, Rick am writing about whether we should or not keep tracking the path of our progress as a society and keep moving slowly to progress.
Personally, I believe that we should keep following our path to be a slow, eco and green civilisation and not become one of those countries that mass produce and manufacture almost everything that is used around the world such as China and Japan. I believe that our country should slow down and slowly start building up our economy and create a new, renewable energy source like solar, wind and aquatic power sources.
Another fact is that, if we speed forward like Japan did, we may have a chance of another war occurring, erasing all of our hard work. This can cause money waste and possible trauma to the people that have spent so much time and effort into making these machines, plus ruining and delaying our energy supplies for as long as it took us to build the power plants.
To sum up my case, the fast progress and carelessness of having a fast and swift path to the most high tech but least efficient techniques are not the way for our civilisation to go as it is highly inefficient and that there are better and more renewable ways like water, wind and solar powered energy features.
FEEDBACK
Jessica Xie- FEEDBACK
**Title**: Should Modernization Sacrifice Cultural Identity? Lessons from Japan’s Post-War Growth
Developing nations often look to Japan’s post-war “economic miracle” as a template for modernization. However, as seen during the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, rapid economic growth comes at a cost: the erosion of cultural identity. While the transformation of Tokyo into a global city symbolized progress, it also triggered deep social and cultural shifts. Should modernizing countries emulate this path, even if it means radical changes to their heritage? The answer lies in the delicate balance Japan attempted to achieve, as reflected in the experiences of its people and the vision of Emperor Hirohito.
Rick’s observations of Olympic-era Tokyo reveal the visible fruits of rapid modernization—gleaming skyscrapers, high-speed trains, and a newfound global prestige. Yet, these advancements came at the expense of Tokyo’s cultural landscape. Traditional neighborhoods were bulldozed to make way for modern infrastructure, displacing long-standing communities and severing the intergenerational ties that defined Japanese life. For many locals, particularly the elderly, modernization felt like an abandonment of their roots, trading centuries-old traditions for fleeting economic gains.
Emperor Hirohito, however, envisioned a path that harmonized progress with preservation. He believed Japan could merge technological innovation with its cultural essence, a philosophy encapsulated in the carefully orchestrated opening ceremony of the 1964 Olympics. Traditional performances shared the stage with modern displays, symbolizing a Japan that embraced its past while stepping into the future. His approach underscores an essential lesson: economic advancement should not come at the expense of a nation’s identity.
Developing nations face immense pressure to modernize, often prioritizing rapid economic growth to compete globally. Yet, Japan’s experience warns against an unchecked focus on progress. Cultural identity anchors a society, providing the values and traditions that foster social cohesion. Abandoning this foundation risks creating a generation untethered from its heritage, unable to fully connect with the progress it inherits.
The path forward is clear. Developing countries must embrace modernization thoughtfully, seeking models like Hirohito’s vision that balance innovation with tradition. Growth that honors heritage is sustainable, enriching not just a nation’s economy but its soul. To follow Japan’s post-war model blindly is to risk losing what makes a nation truly unique. Instead, let the lessons of Tokyo 1964 inspire a modernization that celebrates both progress and identity.
FEEDBACK
tli.sydney – FEEDBACK
my writing is bad just saying
kingston wk 7 writing
FEEDBACK
Cherie- FEEDBACK
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PyZX8ofCtOKGZRc3GHwXziyIQGr7iAkPjhHRW3m4k4A/edit?tab=t.0
My HW
Hello! It looks like the Google Doc link for your writing homework is restricted. Could you please adjust the sharing settings so we can review your work and offer feedback? To make a Google Doc accessible to anyone, follow these steps: Open the Google Doc you want to share. Click on the “Share” button in the top right corner. In the “Share with people and groups” window, click on “Change to anyone with the link” at the bottom. Click “Copy link” and then “Done.” Share the copied link with anyone you want to give access to the document.
Imagine jubilant crowds of people cheering as glistening skyscrapers grace the once impoverished skyline and a rising middle class.. Envision a glistening utopia of prosperity, sublime energy, corporate goods, streets filled with youthful, optimistic, forward-thinking energy. Countries pursuing modernisation should follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a role model, despite the extreme social and cultural changes. I believe this because it will benefit the economic wellbeing of the local community, support cultural preservation even more and also ensure the country has a future to look towards.
Firstly, countries should follow Japan’s example because it would benefit the economic wellbeing of the local community. As tourism rates increase, jobs would be easy to find, the numbers rising. An example is Hawaii during COVID – 19. Hawaii suffered the most damage because Hawaii is one of the most loved travelling destinations in the world, where people could find jobs easily. When COVID struck, calamity ensued as there were no more tourists. Many people lost their jobs.
Next, countries should follow Japan’s example because it would support cultural preservation even more. Museums could be built along with other traditional sites to honour those in the past, maintaining ancient traditions while preserving economic stability. Museums could have special talks about ancient traditions, ensuring traditions would be kept.
Lastly, countries should follow Japan’s example because it would ensure a future for the country. If countries lingered on traditions, their economics would shatter, leaving them vulnerable and unprotected. If they moved forward, they could, again, build special sites to commemorate the traditions.
In conclusion, countries should follow Japan’s example because it will benefit the economic wellbeing of the local community, support cultural preservation even more and also ensure the country has a future to look towards.
FEEDBACK
huashang66- FEEDBACK
sorry this is the edited version
Week Seven Writing30.11.2024
FEEDBACK
Ethan Lee- FEEDBACK
Title:
Should Modernisation Sacrifice Cultural Identity? Lessons from Japan’s Post-War Growth
FOR:
Japan’s rapid post-war economic recovery was fueled by its embrace of industrialisation, technological innovation, and global economic integration. Rick’s observations of Tokyo in 1964 highlight the tangible results of this transformation: a modern metropolis that symbolised progress and international prestige. The hosting of the Olympics served as a platform for Japan to showcase its economic strength and technological prowess while rebranding itself as a peaceful, forward-looking nation.
At the heart of this success was a deliberate strategy of blending tradition with modernisation. Emperor Hirohito embodied this vision, encouraging economic advancement while advocating for the preservation of cultural identity. For example, traditional values like discipline, collective effort, and respect for hierarchy were integrated into corporate and educational systems, ensuring that modernisation did not completely erode Japan’s cultural foundations. This synthesis allowed Japan to modernise without entirely abandoning its heritage, a lesson in how cultural continuity can coexist with economic development.
For countries seeking modernisation, adopting Japan’s model could provide a roadmap to economic success while preserving cultural identity. By selectively integrating aspects of their traditions into modernisation efforts, nations can potentially achieve progress without losing their cultural essence.
AGAINST:
However, the Japanese experience also demonstrates the high social costs of rapid modernisation, making it a less universally suitable model. Rick’s account of Tokyo during the Olympic era reveals not only the city’s physical transformation but also the displacement of local communities and the erosion of traditional lifestyles. Urbanisation and industrialisation disrupted longstanding social networks and ways of life, leading to cultural homogenisation and alienation.
While Emperor Hirohito sought to merge tradition with progress, the reality was more complex. Many traditions were either commodified for international audiences or sidelined to make way for modernisation. This raises questions about whether true cultural preservation is possible under such a model, especially for nations with less cohesive or resilient cultural identities than Japan’s.
Furthermore, the success of Japan’s model was heavily reliant on unique historical and geopolitical factors, such as significant U.S. financial and technological support during the Cold War. This context may not be replicable for countries pursuing modernisation today, making the Japanese experience difficult to emulate.
CONCLUSION:
JAPAN SHOULDN’T SACRIFICE CULTURAL IDENTITY AND SHOULD PRESERVE IT INSTEAD
I thoroughly believe that Japan should preserve cultural importance and significance since they already have a strong sturdy growing economy, but their culture could improve on some of its aspects such as making Japan a more diverse place to live in, with different faces all around. If Japan turned to an industrial and economical country, that would alienate the tourism and cultural community making Japan more unpopular with the travelling industry. That is why I believe that Japan should focus on cultural preservation instead of economic development and growth.
FEEDBACK
Eric Xu- FEEDBACK
writing homework-week 7
writing-week 7
FEEDBACK
ran.d.f.chen – FEEDBACK
Week 7 Writing
Topic: Should developing nations prioritise rapid
economic growth or cultural preservation?
Should emerging nations follow Japan’s economic revolution to climb up the ladder of country development, even if it stampedes over their culture? This would grant them wealth and more evolved lives. But losing culture is melancholy and unfair. The decision weighs heavily on the developing countries shoulders like colossal, rugged boulders. This choice can cause catastrophe or be a sublime blessing.
If economic growth is more engrossed by developing countries, benefits will flow in. The economic growth could make glistening, towering buildings materialise, the erosion of filth occur, a humongous range of occupations emerge and enhance the living standards of humans. An example of this is the country Singapore. In the 1960s, Singapore was an underdeveloped country that had massive unemployment, was overcrowded, skyscrapers that were deteriorating and an estimated 70% of the population were engulfed by slums. But, in 1973, Singapore brought in high education and training, industries, infrastructure and transport. This leap has made their GDP 501.4 billion USD. Furthermore, they are ranked thirty-one in economics in the world because they let in economic growth. Hence, economic growth is essential for developing countries.
On the other hand, economic growth could eradicate culture. Eliminating culture is very sorrowful and it is where a country’s religion is forgotten. Keeping culture alive spreads diversity. Without it, many more other aspects of life, such as traditions, languages, divine beings and beliefs would also be buried. A country who keeps their culture existing is India. India’s languages, traditions, gods and beliefs are known throughout the world. India keeps their stupendous culture alive, as they always pass down their knowledge to kids about their unique religions, special books about the culture are kept safe by many Indians, they celebrate their culture all around the world and they cook their cultural food more often to keep their culture living. India is tenth in the world at keeping their heritage alive. Thus, culture is also an important piece of life.
Even though both sides of the argument are filled with advantages, economic growth wins in the end. Prioritising economic growth more than culture is an excellent choice. Having a high economy can boost various things to make life more fulfilling. It encourages acceleration and zealousness to become more progressive. Economic growth is needed more by developing countries than culture, so countries should follow Japan’s innovative steps.
FEEDBACK
Bhupender _ – FEEDBACK
The question of whether developing nations should prioritize rapid economic growth over cultural preservation is a complex one, especially when considering the example of Japan’s post-war economic miracle. While Japan’s transformation from a war-torn nation to an economic powerhouse is indeed a remarkable story, it is essential to analyze the implications of such a development path on cultural identity and social cohesion.
Japan’s post-war economic miracle, epitomized during the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, showcased a nation eager to project an image of modernity and progress. The rapid industrialization and urbanization that occurred during this period were impressive, but they came at a cost to cultural preservation. Rick’s observations from that era indicate a profound transformation in Tokyo, where traditional practices and community structures began to erode under the weight of modernization. As the city expanded and embraced Western technologies and practices, many local customs and ways of life were overshadowed.
Emperor Hirohito’s vision, as articulated during this time, was one of merging tradition with progress. He understood the necessity of modernization to compete on a global stage but also emphasized the importance of maintaining Japan’s cultural identity. His perspective suggests that a balance can be struck between economic advancement and cultural preservation. This highlights the potential dangers of pursuing rapid growth at the expense of cultural heritage, as it can lead to a sense of alienation among local communities who feel disconnected from their roots.
Local community members during the 1964 Olympics often expressed anxiety about the rapid changes occurring in their neighborhoods. Traditional markets were replaced by modern shopping complexes, and communal practices were gradually replaced by individualistic behaviors associated with urban life. This shift not only impacted local economies but also eroded the social fabric that had characterized these communities for generations. The loss of cultural practices and communal ties can lead to a diminished sense of identity and belonging, which are crucial elements for societal cohesion.
Furthermore, the case of Japan illustrates that economic growth does not automatically translate into improved quality of life for all citizens. While the overall economy expanded, disparities emerged, and many individuals felt left behind in the race towards modernization. The prioritization of rapid economic growth often leads to the neglect of social welfare and cultural initiatives, which are vital for holistic development.
In conclusion, while Japan’s post-war economic miracle provides an inspiring model of rapid growth, it also serves as a cautionary tale about the potential ramifications of forsaking cultural preservation. Developing nations should not blindly emulate this path but instead seek a balanced approach that honors their cultural identities while pursuing economic development. The vision of Emperor Hirohito, advocating for the integration of tradition and progress, offers a framework that respects cultural heritage while also embracing the benefits of modernization. By prioritizing cultural preservation alongside economic growth, developing nations can foster a more inclusive and sustainable development strategy that resonates with their unique identities and values.
FEEDBACK
dineshaggarwal13yahoo-com – FEEDBACK
Argument Against Prioritizing Rapid Economic Growth Over Cultural Preservation
Countries pursuing modernization should not unconditionally follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, especially if it requires sacrificing cultural heritage. While Japan’s rapid economic growth after World War II is often seen as a success, it came at the cost of significant social and cultural upheaval. This suggests that prioritizing economic growth without considering cultural preservation can lead to long-term negative consequences for a nation’s identity and social cohesion.
Rick’s observations of 1964 Tokyo during the Olympics show the extent of Japan’s transformation. The city was being reshaped by new infrastructure, industry, and technology, driving its economy to new heights. However, this rapid modernization also led to the destruction of traditional neighborhoods and local cultural practices. Areas of historical significance were demolished, and older, traditional ways of life were marginalized in favor of Western ideals. In the race to modernize, Japan’s economic growth overshadowed the preservation of cultural heritage, resulting in the loss of valuable community traditions.
Emperor Hirohito, while understanding the need for economic growth, also advocated for the preservation of Japan’s cultural identity. His vision was not one of total abandonment of tradition, but rather one that sought to merge the old with the new. Hirohito believed Japan could modernize while still maintaining its cultural roots, recognizing that cultural heritage was not a barrier to economic progress, but rather an integral part of the nation’s identity. This vision demonstrates the importance of balance—economic development should not come at the expense of cultural traditions.
Local community members during this time also expressed concerns about the impact of rapid change. Many people, particularly those living in older neighborhoods, felt alienated by the urbanization and industrialization happening around them. The erosion of cultural spaces and the disruption of community life led to a sense of loss. Younger generations, drawn to the allure of modernity, often neglected traditional values and practices. This generational divide created a disconnect, as people found themselves caught between the old and the new, with little space to preserve their cultural heritage.
Moreover, focusing solely on rapid economic growth without considering cultural preservation can have lasting social consequences. Communities that lose their cultural traditions and landmarks risk losing their sense of identity. This can lead to feelings of alienation and fragmentation, as people no longer feel rooted in their society or history. In Japan’s case, the economic boom of the post-war era brought prosperity but also left many feeling disconnected from their cultural past.
In conclusion, while Japan’s post-war economic success offers valuable lessons in industrialization, it also demonstrates the risks of sacrificing cultural heritage in pursuit of growth. Countries seeking modernization should learn from Japan’s experience by striving to balance economic progress with the preservation of cultural identity. By doing so, they can achieve sustainable development that respects both their economic and cultural foundations. Prioritizing culture alongside growth ensures that a nation can evolve without losing its unique identity.
FEEDBACK
samdhaklive-com-au – FEEDBACK
Imagine a world where graceful crowds of people hurry to their jobs. Their pattern is organised for maximum efficiency—each choreographed step is a mirror of their country’s development. Tall buildings, sleek and streamlined to optimise their usage, tower over the crimson horizon, overshadowing past troubles and the once-impoverished skyline. This utopia of prosperity and perspicuous beauty is the embodiment of modern perfection—simple as the blooming of flowers yet as complex as the human mind.
This is our reality if we embrace rapid advancement and economic growth – even if it’s at the cost of the cultural face of the country. Putting it as a priority can reap insurmountable societal benefits and progress – boosting community, workforce, markets, stocks, international trades and much more. Countries chasing modernisation should reflect on Japan’s Post-War miracle – a historical checkpoint and a roundabout in the Japanese community. The miraculous boost in the economy has moved them thus forward from their despicable past. Yet still, Japan’s culture is thriving – presenting a harmony between growth and conservation.
First and foremost, adopting rapid economic growth can boost a more profound society and reap many other benefits. Rapid economic growth is a tree with many branches and talents, serving as a basis for more advanced things – such as nuclear energy, skyscrapers, and even artificial islands. Rapid economic growth can also push the country to First World, unlocking countless trading partners, markets and potential allies. Not only that, but it can also increase the workforce as a bigger society needs more workers. With that, it can bring people out of poverty – increasing happiness indexes and healthy families.
Some may say that putting growth as the Number 1 priority will demolish the cultural and rural side of the country. But this isn’t entirely true. Technologically advanced countries – such as post-war Japan and China – still have major cultural significance. Japan is renowned for its friendly people respectful manners and dignified culture while China is prominent for its thriving rural societies and cultures. This means that rapid advancement doesn’t necessarily correlate to the destruction of culture – plus, the money and economic stability earned from such development can be used to in turn fund the conservation of culture and cultural practices.
Furthermore, valuing economic growth can guide us to a better future. Commonly, other people to tell you that you should move on and learn from your mistakes, and that’s true. But if you constantly stay back at a cultural society, you are not acknowledging the flaws, pretending and promising yourself that it’s ‘good enough’, culture is important, but living in a flawed reality that you can rectify isn’t the way to go.
Whether it’s rapid advancements or large progress of trades, economic growth is almost always the way to go. At the exchange of a flawed reality and cultural face, in exchange for a utopian reality of prosperity and joy – the winner is evident. From unlocking modern advancements, to fighting with new allies, rapid economic advancement is the path to follow.
FEEDBACK
Benjamin Yang- FEEDBACK
Writing Homework :
Topic: Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
Interview Questions:
1. What are your academic strengths and weaknesses?
2. Can you describe a challenging situation you’ve faced and how you handled it?
3. What are your long-term career aspirations, and how will this scholarship help you achieve them?
WRITING HOMEWORK:
Imagine, jubilant crowds of people cheering, glistening skyscrapers grace the once impoverished skyline. Envision a glistening utopia of prosperity, sublime energy, corporate goods, streets filled with youthful, optimistic, forward-thinking energy. Countries pursuing modernisation should follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a role model, despite the extreme social and cultural changes. It’s the Paris of the east. I believe this because it can benefit the economic wellbeing of the local people, it can help countries futures and rapid economic growth can actually support the cultural preservations of nations museums and cultural centres.
First of all, people should follow Japan’s example because it would benefit the economic wellbeing of the local people. That’s already a monumental reason why this change should proceed. During Covid-19, the people in Hawaii suffered the most. Do you know why? This was because of the tourism industry breaking down as no one could travel anymore due to lockdown. This meant many Hawaiians lost their jobs, so unemployment was at an all-time high. Except over time Hawaii’s tourism industry has escalated and more people have been able to get jobs because of the industries. This has widely benefited the local community.
Some people may think that making rapid growth our NO.1 priority will destroy the cultural preservation of the country. This is a very extreme misinterpretation because the money produced by the economy will support cultural preservation more than ever, through memorials, museums and local centres. Tourists could also learn the ancient culture of the country by visiting. Thailand provides the ideal example for this. Thailand’s Muay Thai, a traditional martial arts practice. It was once lost, but now Muay Thai is experiencing a meteoric rise in global popularity. How did this happen? When Thailand began prioritising its tourism industry, many people from around the world came to learn, practice and master this form of art. This has resurrected Muay Thai through tourism, preserving this great form of art.
Finally, rapid growth is a crucial part in a countries future. The economy’s profit will make certain the preservation of the country’s culture. Also, GDP leads to greater healthcare, educational outcomes and the overall prosperity – wellbeing of its people. This will make sure that this country will be remembered, not fading away into history as the clock keeps ticking.
In conclusion, we should all follow Japan’s example as it will benefit the economic wellbeing of the local people, it can support many cultural preservations, and the most crucial one is that it will help the country develop a better future.
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS:
What are your academic strengths and weaknesses?
An academic strength of mine is that I am organized, and I am always open to teachers or peers feedback. Whenever we do 2 stars and 1 wish in class with a partner, I always listen to the feedback they give me, and I never get frustrated with it even if I may not agree with them. I am also very organized, every year at my school we each get a diary. We use the diary to organize our homework, add in our extra co – curriculars and write important reminders. My teacher has said that my diary is very organized, and my organization skills are excellent. I know when I have to do homework, when it’s maybe special events at school or outside of school. Some weaknesses of mine is that I struggle a bit in grammar. I sometimes have a bit of trouble, and I get confused sometimes. Although, this year everyone in year 5 had a parent – teacher – student interview. It’s basically a parent teacher interview but the student is there too. I was given extra sheets to practice at home and it has really helped me improve my grammar skills.
Can you describe a challenging situation you’ve faced and how you handled it?
It’s not the most challenging situation I’ve faced but this year I started my own business. I had to decide though if I would actually have time to spend time making things for the stalls I would do. It would’ve made me have less time to do my homework. Except I figured out a way that I could manage my homework and start my business as well. I used to do soccer on Friday, Monday, Saturday and other days to. I decided to not do soccer on Friday anymore so that I would have time to do my homework. Also, instead of doing a stall almost every week I only do a few stalls throughout the year. That might sound like a bad idea but throughout all the weeks that I’m not doing a stall I can find time to make many things to sell and when I do a stall, I have lots of stock.
What are your long-term career aspirations, and how will this scholarship help you achieve them?
My long-term career goal is to become a professional soccer player. The schools that I am applying for, I know that they have good sports programs. The schools I am enrolling for participate in the IPSHA Saturday sport competition and in term 1, it’s soccer. Playing soccer may not be a great career goal but it can help enhance my teamwork and collaboration skills. It teaches coordination. promotes teamwork and sharing. teaches you to ‘think on the run’ helps to increase skills in concentration, persistence and self-discipline. This scholarship can help me achieve it by letting me use these sports programs at these schools I am enrolling for and let me develop some crucial strengths that I will need later on and now in life.
FEEDBACK
Annabelle Tung FEEDBACK
Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Developing nations are forming and their income is very minimal. People are living in slums, clawing desperately through endless piles of rubbish every day for a measly morsel of food. Looking to your left, some of these poor peasants begging for money. Their grotty offensive body odour wafts menacingly up your nose strangling and poisoning your brain. And then you start to feel hazy. You feel forced to give them money, because you don’t live in sadness like them every day. The world shouldn’t be like this. Developing nations should prioritize rapid economic growth, rather than cultural wellbeing.
Currently, many areas around the world are starting to develop their nation. There are two main priorities that these nations focus on; economic growth, and cultural preservation. This is why both of these are important:
Economic Growth: Nation has houses to live in, food, water, and enough money to live happily
Cultural Preservation: Nation has a diverse community with lots of cultures
Both of these priorities are majorly important but I am going to tell you why economic growth is more important for these two reasons: Rapid economic growth can actually support cultural preservation, and that money is the cornerstone of life.
Have you ever completed a task, and then realised that you also completed another one? I believe that rapid economic growth should be prioritised because it can actually support cultural preservation. For example, if the Aboriginals were given $200 million dollars in exchange for their land, the Aboriginals could then use that money to construct a museum to store all of their ancient possessions and share their culture. Museums help preserve lost items such as cultures, species, and gems. This is how rapid economic growth can support cultural preservation.
Secondly, it is crucial that rapid economic growth should be prioritised because money is the cornerstone of life. In life money is essential for health, food, water, electricity, essential needs, and education. Would you rather a country where people live in happiness with enough money but the community isn’t diverse, or a diverse nation living in poverty? Money is something you need in life, unlike a diverse nation. You can live without a diverse nation. You can live without different cultures. But it is very hard to live without money.
In conclusion, rapid economic growth should be prioritized rather than culture because rapid economic growth can actually support cultural growth, and money is a cornerstone of life. Think about it, would you rather have money, or a diverse community?
Kobe 🙂 🙂 🙁
FEEDBACK
Kobe – FEEDBACK
Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
Developing nations and helping them grow is a very minimal and kind step to take. People are living in huts and trees, desprately trying to look for food, some of these poor people are begging for money and morsels of food. Their pungent, grotty stench creeps up your nose. You feel forced to give them money, because you empathise their poignant pain to live in darkness. The world shouldn’t be filled with poor beggers. Developing nations should be a priority for this world rather then cultural welbeing.
Currently, many areas around the world are trying to develop their nation. There are two cardinal priorities that these nations focus on; economic growth, and cultural preservation. Econimic growth is when people there are less poor people and everyone has houses to live in, food, water, and enough money to live happily. Cultural preservation is Nation has a diverse community with lots of cultures
Both of these priorities are essentially important but economic growth is more important for these reasonss: Rapid economic growth can actually support cultural preservation.
I believe that rapid economic growth should be prioritised because it can actually support cultural preservation. For example, if the torres strait Islanders were given 300 million dollars in exchange for their land, they could then use that money to construct a museum to store all of their ancient possessions and share their culture. Museums help preserve lost items such as cultures, species, and gems. This is how rapid economic growth can support cultural preservation.
Additionally, it is crucial that economic growth should be priotised. In life money is essential for health, food, water, electricity, essential needs, and education. Would you rather a country where people live in happiness with enough money but the community isn’t diverse, or a diverse nation living in poverty? Money is something you need in life, unlike a diverse nation. You can live without a diverse nation. You can live without different cultures. But it is very hard to live without money.
In conclusion, economic growth should be prioritized rather than culture because rapid economic growth because it can actually support cultural growth, and money is a important part of life.
FEEDBACK
sagar.khandre@gmail.com – FEEDBACK
Is Fast Speed Economic Industrialisation A Worthy Sacrifice to Cultural Identity?
Steam billows out of Japan’s industrialised, profit-driven nation as countless labouring workers gather around to share their income, a minimal wage even though they were poor, desperate and poverty-stricken. Even as this exposition continues, many homeless, impoverished and orphaned citizens beg for an allowance to a home, food and water. As I have been in Japan before, even in the most high-profile cities such Tokyo and Osaka, there are always beggars looking for money disturbing the luxurious surrounding. Many of the world’s gravest problems are due to a change. A change in technology meant that global warming appeared as a threat to humanity. A change in manufacturing created countless problems, such as low wage and child labour. Many third world countries these days are trying to achieve supreme industrialisation but with doing so, they may be harming their nation’s cultural identity and create hazards for future generations.
As many third-world countries are facing the severe problem of losing pace of the fast approach of the world, many are struggling to maintain a dependable strategy in increasing the country’s productivity and efficiency. In countries such as Vietnam and Japan, economic growth has both developed and harmed their countries. However, as they soon adapted to this new urban culture, many things in their cities changed. In Japan, ancient houses were not for living, only for tourism and display. Real residential areas lay in the CBD, the central business district where urban renewal sparked a revolution of technology, modernisation and development. Countries that are behind the fact pace movement of other nations should promote this idea of economical growth as they gradually overwhelm the possible dangers of this plan and continuously support the future generations with vast resources and technology.
Overall, I believe that economic growth is essential for maintaining a balanced society with cultural identity and masses of technological improvement. It is important for third world countries to adapt to this plan and to improve their nation.
FEEDBACK
Damon Yuan – FEEDBACK
The dirty, polluted roads wreaked of cigar ash, cracked tiles and rundown buildings filling the once glorious city. The impoverished lay, starving in desperation as sketchy pedlars sold rotten fruit to the unsuspecting poor. A once bustling tourist attraction was now littered with cheap souvenirs while pickpockets and thieves weaved in and out of markets, in desperate need of money. The war torn buildings were populated with insects and rodents, many trying to escape the hellish country. Constant fights broke out, and when another country capitalised on the vulnerable nation, it was all over. This is what could happen if a developing country prioritises cultural preservation instead of rapid economic growth. Although preserving a country’s culture is important, I fervently believe developing countries should focus on growing a robust economy. Developing nations should use Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model and strive to achieve a stable, wealthy economy.
To begin with, a growing economy greatly benefits the locals. This means that the locals can start getting real jobs rather than just being tour guides. A growing economy means growing businesses and locals will be able to get jobs and live happier lives. Rapid growth also means that there’s no reason for a corrupt government to be formed and the economy’s fast growth will organise the nation, making it even easier to find jobs. Rapid growth will erase all poverty and citizens will grow up hard working and diligent. Rapid growth also means that locals can achieve their aspirations, like travelling or art. In North Korea, a developing nation centered around dictatorship, no one enters or leaves the country legally. Consequently, North Korea is one of the poorest countries because it doesn’t prioritise rapid growth. It literally cuts itself off from the outside world which prevents diversity and trade, making North Korea an extremely vulnerable economy. Isn’t it clear that by prioritising rapid growth, it will not only benefit the locals but the country as whole?
Secondly, prioritising the economy can also preserve the culture at the same time. Though this might seem contradictory, when developing nations prioritise economic growth, they can also attract tourists. When a country focuses too much on preserving their culture, the economy can rot. The crime rates will go up because not everybody will have a job because of the poor economy and eventually, it might end up like the city I described in the first paragraph. For example, pacific islands such as Fiji suffered immensely during COVID-19 because of the lack of tourism. Furthermore, when a country’s economy is stable, tourism will follow after. For example, in Japan, they prioritised rapid growth first, becoming one of the wealthiest countries. Then, and only then, did they start to introduce their culture. Now, Japanese culture is loved by many including myself and is one of the most popular tourist attractions. Clearly, by prioritising rapid growth, culture and tourism will follow, don’t you concur?
Finally, when prioritising rapid growth, the country will be a lot more safe. When a good economy is established by our government, there will be no need to fight when resources are plentiful. This is why crime rates are much higher in developing countries because of the lack of resources. Nations with good economies also have better law enforcement and people are generally much friendlier and ethical. When rapid growth is prioritised, new cities will be built with better technology and education. Hospitals will be built to take care of patients correctly and more infrastructure means more jobs available meaning the employment rates will skyrocket. Lavish metropolises glisten in the radiant sunshine, educated and kind citizens diligently working. Newly built buildings and pavements are already being used and the bustling but crime-free city has an upbeat and tranquil mood to it. This is the city that could be built if developing nations wisely choose to prioritise rapid economic growth instead of trying to preserve their culture, and this is the city that every nation should have.
FEEDBACK
Lana Dang – FEEDBACK
Writing Wk 7
Imagine a country once filled with impoverished people turned into a nation with jubilant crowds cheering, glistening skyscrapers gracing the once tarnished skyline, transforming into a utopia of prosperity. This was the result of Japan’s post-war economic miracle. Economist Milton Friedman once said that “The best way to grow rapidly is to have the country bombarded.” Though it is hard to even picture a country prospering after losing everything, the Japanese post-war economy did just that. Japan unconditionally surrendered on August 14th, 1945, with World War II costing the country an estimated 2.6 to 3.1 million lives and 56 billion USD. Though Japan was left with almost nothing, their economy recovered at an incredible speed.
By 1964, the world marveled at Tokyo as it hosted the Summer Olympics, a symbol of Japan’s extraordinary recovery. This era, documented vividly by Rick, showed a city bustling with innovation, technological advancements, and economic growth. Skyscrapers dotted the skyline, and modern infrastructure mirrored the spirit of a reborn nation. However, this transformation was not without significant social and cultural shifts.
Countries aspiring for modernization should follow Japan’s path for several compelling reasons.
Firstly, Japan’s rapid industrialization and technological advancements created numerous job opportunities, raising the standard of living for its citizens. Countries aiming for modernization can benefit from similar strategies, ensuring economic stability and prosperity. The construction of modern infrastructure, such as bullet trains and advanced highways, showcased Japan’s commitment to progress. For developing nations, following this model can lead to improved connectivity and efficiency. By embracing modernization, Japan positioned itself as a global economic powerhouse. Other countries can aspire to this level of competitiveness, fostering innovation and attracting international investments.
However, some argue that the Japanese model might not be suitable for all nations. Radical modernization in Japan led to significant cultural shifts, sometimes at the expense of traditional values and practices. Other nations might struggle to balance modernization with the preservation of their unique cultural identities. Rapid economic growth can sometimes widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Japan faced its own challenges with social inequality, and other nations might find it difficult to ensure inclusive growth. Japan’s industrial boom also had environmental repercussions, including pollution and resource depletion. Modernizing nations must consider sustainable practices to avoid long-term ecological damage.
Emperor Hirohito played a crucial role in navigating the tension between tradition and modernity. His vision of merging Japan’s rich cultural heritage with progressive values exemplified the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity. While he championed modernization, he also emphasized the importance of retaining Japan’s unique cultural essence. This delicate balance is something other countries must contemplate when pursuing modernization.
Local community members had varied reactions to these changes. Some embraced the opportunities brought by modernization, while others mourned the loss of traditional ways of life. This duality highlights the broader challenge of achieving progress without erasing the past.
In conclusion, Japan’s post-war economic miracle offers a compelling model for countries pursuing modernization. While there are challenges to consider, the potential benefits of economic growth, infrastructure development, and global competitiveness make it a path worth exploring. By learning from Japan’s experience, other nations can aim for a future where tradition and progress coexist harmoniously.
FEEDBACK
Phuong Nguyen- FEEDBACK
Prompt: “Should countries pursuing modernisation follow Japan’s post-war economic miracle as a model, even if it means radical social and cultural changes? Argue for or against this development path, using evidence from Rick’s observations of 1964 Olympic-era Tokyo and the perspectives of both Emperor Hirohito and local community members. Consider how Hirohito’s vision of merging tradition with progress demonstrates the complex relationship between economic advancement and cultural identity.”
Economic Growth VS Cultural Preservation
Imagine your city prospering and thriving over the limit, excelling in economic growth. Picture the jolly laughter of the satisfied citizens with their unwavering happiness. Prioritising rapid economic growth clearly outweighs the benefits of cultural preservation as there will be improved well-being and may support cultural preservation. Also, we can preserve our future country from rapid economic growth.
First and foremost, rapid economic growth is essential for developing our country. It promotes our and the country’s well-being in versatile ways such as prioritising 3rd partying countries that are impoverished. This will rank the country’s well-being higher and improve the quality of the impoverished country.
Additionally, rapid economic growth expands on the topic of cultural preservation. Iconic capital such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louver Art Museum may be preserved as money invested would make the stake of the arc features improved, and enhanced for future years.
Do you want the country’s future to prosper? Investing in rapid economic growth will aid with education, hospitality, privileges, food and water accessibility, enhanced infrastructure, and improved political stability, all these factors will enhance the destiny of the country. Rapid economic growth will not only scatter to these options, this will create an overall improvement in all the factors.
To conclude, rapid economic growth is the go as it improves well-being, potentially advocate for cultural preservation, and also considering the future effects in our country. Without any doubt, economic growth outweighs cultural preservation. Just imagine your country thriving and prospering.
FEEDBACK
Tina205 – FEEDBACK
why are there 2 week 6 writings
Tokyo’s Revolution
FEEDBACK
Nathaniel Abustan – WK7 FEEDBACK
Should developing nations prioritise rapid economic growth or cultural preservation?
Countries trying to modernise should follow Japan’s post-war model of rapid economic growth, even if it means making significant changes to their social and cultural practices. Japan’s economic transformation after World War II is a powerful example of how focusing on rapid growth can improve living standards and help a country become a global leader. By prioritising modernization, Japan rebuilt its economy, developed new technologies, and turned cities like Tokyo into bustling, advanced metropolises. The growth provided better jobs, improved healthcare, and a higher quality of life for its citizens. This progress shows that modernisation can bring real benefits, especially in countries struggling to overcome poverty or devastation.
One of the strongest reasons to support rapid economic growth is that it leads to better opportunities for people. Japan’s focus on rebuilding after the war led to an industrial boom that helped millions of people find work, improve their education, and live healthier lives. The transformation of Tokyo for the 1964 Olympics, with its new infrastructure, fast trains, and modern buildings, demonstrated how quickly a country can become more competitive on the global stage. The economic miracle also helped Japan rise from the devastation of war, showing that focusing on growth can heal a country and allow its people to thrive.
Emperor Hirohito’s vision of blending tradition with progress is another key reason why following Japan’s path makes sense. Hirohito didn’t believe that modernisation meant abandoning culture. Instead, he thought Japan could embrace new technologies while maintaining its traditional values. This approach helped Japan balance growth with respect for its cultural heritage. While some may argue that rapid growth leads to cultural loss, Japan’s example shows that preserving important traditions is still possible while moving forward economically. By integrating modern technology with artistic elements, Japan proved that a country doesn’t have to choose between progress and tradition.
In conclusion, developing nations should prioritise rapid economic growth such as Japan, after World War II. The benefits of modernisation, such as improved quality of life, more job opportunities, and better infrastructure, are too important to ignore. While culture is vital, Japan’s experience shows that growth and tradition can go hand in hand. Countries that focus on modernising their economies will be able to provide their citizens with a brighter, more prosperous future while also finding ways to preserve the best aspects of their culture.
FEEDBACK
Gina- FEEDBACK
1. What are your academic strengths and weaknesses?
A weakness that I have is organisation because sometimes I forget where I put stuff, which had lead me to become a little bit disorganised. Although this had been a weakness, I now have been able to effectively manage my organisation with a special technique, which is to repeat where I place the object in my head so it is in my memory. This technique has guided me and has been able to make my organisation more efficient and seamless. For example, one day, I couldn’t remember the place where I placed my Ipad for school. When I found it, it was in the cupboard. So whenever I placed my Ipad somewhere, I repeated where I placed it over and over again in my head so I wouldn’t forget it.
2. Can you describe a challenging situation you’ve faced and how you handled it?
One time when I was in a challenging situation and I had to handle it was when my friends were having a roast battle but they got a bit off topic and triggered each other. I dealt with this situation by trying to drop in the conversation and talking to each other to see what would be the best for them. I tried to calm them down too, but since this was my first time dealing with it, it was challenging to do so.
3. What are your long-term career aspirations, and how will this scholarship help you achieve them?
One of my long term career aspirations is becoming an NBA player. I have a deep passion for playing basketball. I always play it during lunch and recess time with my friends and have great fun battling for the win with them. I believe that The Kings School scholarship will help me with my career with intensive training and engaging lessons. The Kings School has been known to be an exceptionally advanced basketball program and has great rankings. This is why I believe that the Kings School scholarship will aid my way to success in my future career.
FEEDBACK
Tina205 – FEEDBACK