- Persuasive Writing : Imagine you are addressing a panel of parents and social media executives. Write a persuasive speech arguing for children’s right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. Use at least 8 vocabulary words from the list in your writing. (500 words)
- Choose one of the following story starters and write a narrative. (500 words)
1. Olivia stood at the edge of the abandoned amusement park, the wind carrying whispers of a forgotten summer that never seemed to leave her mind.
2. As Marcus opened the old leather-bound journal, he was startled to see his name scribbled across the first page in a handwriting that wasn’t his own.
3. Emma’s heart raced as the train pulled away from the station, leaving behind everything she had ever known.
4. The package arrived for Jason with no return address, but inside was something he had lost fifteen years ago.
5. Mia knew something was off the moment she walked into her new apartment—the furniture wasn’t arranged how she had left it.
6. Standing in front of the crowd, Daniel adjusted the microphone nervously, unaware that this speech would change the course of his life forever.
7. When Lily saw the flickering lights in the distance, she knew the rumors about the old lighthouse weren’t just stories.
8. The last thing Sophia expected when she returned to her hometown was to find a letter from her younger self waiting on her doorstep.
9. Ethan never believed in ghosts until the night he heard someone call his name from the empty room upstairs.
10. As the plane took off, Ava looked out the window, knowing this wasn’t just any flight—it was her last chance at freedom.
- Scholarship Interview Question : if you had one superpower you could wish for, what would it be? (500 words)
Please upload your homework as a comment below:
54 thoughts on “Week 7 Writing Homework”
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed parents, and leaders of the social media world,
Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today. We live in a time when the digital footprint we leave behind starts long before we even take our first steps. From the moment a child is born, their lives are documented in photos, videos, and posts on platforms that will outlast most of the devices we use to access them. But as we revel in sharing the joy of our children’s milestones with friends and family, we must ask ourselves: Are we respecting their rights to privacy and autonomy in this rapidly evolving digital age?
Children, like all of us, deserve the right to consent to how they are represented, especially in a public sphere like social media. This right should extend to giving them veto power over what is posted about them by those closest to them—their parents. Allow me to explain why.
First, let’s talk about privacy. The content we share on social media becomes part of a child’s online identity, often without their knowledge or approval. This can have far-reaching consequences for their future—personal, academic, and professional. Schools, potential employers, and even peers can access these posts, forming judgments or biases based on an online persona the child had no role in creating. We must ask ourselves: Is it fair to compromise their future for a few likes and comments today?
Second, this issue touches on consent and autonomy. As parents, we strive to teach our children about boundaries and respect for their bodies and feelings. Yet, when we share their lives without their consent, we undermine those very lessons. Children are individuals with their own thoughts and feelings, and as they grow older, they become more aware of how they are portrayed online. Granting them the right to veto posts about them empowers them to take control of their digital presence. It teaches them that their opinions matter and that they have a say in how they are seen by the world.
Third, consider the emotional impact. Children can feel embarrassed, exposed, or even ashamed of certain posts, especially as they enter their teenage years—a time when self-image and social pressures intensify. A seemingly innocent post today could lead to ridicule or bullying tomorrow. By giving children the right to veto these posts, we foster an environment of trust where they feel safe to express their discomfort and know that their feelings are valued.
Finally, this is a societal issue that requires collaboration between parents and social media platforms. As platforms that profit from user engagement, social media companies bear a responsibility to ensure their users’ rights are protected, especially when it comes to minors. Providing features that allow children to manage their digital identity—such as a veto option for family posts—could revolutionize the way we think about privacy in the digital age. Social media companies have an opportunity to lead the way in creating a safer, more ethical online environment for children.
Parents, I understand the joy and pride that comes from sharing our children’s lives. But we must also recognize that with that pride comes the responsibility to respect their autonomy, protect their privacy, and ensure their emotional well-being.
Let us give our children a voice in their digital lives, and let us ensure that they have the right to veto what is posted about them. After all, their future should be shaped by their choices—not ours.
Thank you.
FEEDBACK
tli.sydney (1)
Imagine a world that is safe and without any hackers. This is achieved if children just go through what their parents say and type in the internet. The status quo is that we just let our parents send off information that could lead to people hacking into accounts. These photos and messages include first pictures and times when we were babies. From the moment a child is born, people’s lives are documented with birth certificates, pictures and videos. Though , yes we can look through the parts of our life that we never remembered, having these pictures has an even bigger problem than just forgetting, it is having a life where people know your every secret.
Us children are always under pressure of eyes and success. Fail your child, fail your life. And though a baby having a total breakdown, may be cute to adults, this can be a bomb in a war for jobs and bullies. Allow me to explain why.
First, let’s talk about privacy. As a fact, in the UN convention of human rights, article 16 states that every child should have safety and privacy from their day to day lives. This clearly just says if children don’t get their privacy, it is basically breaking a human right. It isn’t even the only problem if parents just send out messages like ‘my child’s first day at school! Hackers can somehow figure out who you are. Then causing your accounts to be deleted.
Second, this issue touches on consent and autonomy. In fact, over 56% of children ask if they can see their parent’s text’s before they send them. Most say it should rise to at least 60%. Students need consent, and as I saw earlier, if parents send the wrong things, it will be ammunition for bullies.
Third, let’s think about the emotional impact. As I said earlier, if parents send the wrong things, it would be ammunition to bullying. This would propose a bullying rise. This would make the child suffer depression and won’t do their best at school. However, though you can say that people can just look through what their parents send, they can just send it in secret, and children will never know.
Parents, I understand the joy, pride and that you guys are glory-seekers that comes from sharing your children’s lives. But we must also consider that with all of these 3 things put together, comes the responsibility to respect their choices, protect their privacy, and ensure their emotional well-being.
Let us give our children a voice in their and our electronic lives, and let us ensure that we have the right to veto what is posted about ourselves. After all, our future should be shaped by their choices—not yours.
Thank you for listening.
FEEDBACK
grace.creek
Week 7 Writing Homework
Ladies and gentlemen, parents, and esteemed guests,
I deeply appreciate the opportunity to discuss a serious problem today. We are now living in a very digitally enhanced time, where a child’s digital footprint exists even before they speak their first words. From the moment they come into our world, their very existence is carefully documented in videos, photos, and reels that will outlast our memories. But as we joyfully share our favourite moments with friends and family, we must ponder this question: Are we respecting our children’s boundaries, privacy and rights in a rapidly changing world?
Children, just like any of us, deserve the right to consent to how they are viewed on social media. From photos of their awards, to fun moments together, children deserve a right to consent or deny certain knowledge about them to be shared online. This veto power will allow children to have a tighter grip on what they want the public to see them as, benefitting everyone. Allow me to show you why.
First, let’s touch base on privacy. Imagine your whole life was posted on the internet, from funny times to most embarrassing moments. This isn’t just a dystopian scenario – it’s the life of many children today. But unlike us humans, the internet never forgets. While a funny, cute video of a tantrum may seem cute and even a way to remember those fun times for parents, the consequences may soon become disastrous, becoming ammunition for bullies or maybe even affecting future job prospects. We protect our childrens’ medical reports and school information. Why should the social prospect be any different? The content we share on social media is often done without a child’s knowledge or approval – and it’s nearly always about them.
Secondly, let’s talk about the emotional impact that comes with sharing particularly sensitive information. Children can feel embarrassed, scared, anxious, and sometimes will often dread going to places where people often frolic on the internet. But they don’t tell anyone, for fear of what they will say. So while posting a few things on the internet may be all fun and games, consider the impact each post will have on our children. Is it fair to subject children to that amount of stress and pressure before they’re old enough to consent?
Finally, we must consider the future consequences of implementing this change. Imagine if you were a child in this digital age. Would you have wanted a say in what was posted online about you? By giving children veto rights, we’re acknowledging that they are individuals that can choose who they are, not having to constantly live up to their parent’s fake online personas. Consider this: the case of your twenty-one-year-old child who lost the chance for a scholarship because of an offensive tweet shared earlier, by her parents. Is it the adult’s fault that she lost that chance even before she had a say in it? Should we really be dictating their lives before they take control?
Parents, I realise you take great joy in posting your child’s moments online for people to experience. But we must take into account both our perspective and our child’s.
This veto power doesn’t mean it’s the end of social media posting forever – period. This collaboration means that both parents and children can control what things are posted about them, while respecting each other’s boundaries and rights.
Let us show our children that we trust them – not only in this social sharenting, but as a family.
When Lily saw the flickering lights in the distance, she knew the rumours about the old lighthouse weren’t just stories. Adjusting her glasses, she stared into the murky darkness, her brain slowly etching the figure of a lone lighthouse standing alone at sea, battling the rushing currents. But where was it before? The questions itched at her brain, bubbling with a ferocious, unbridled energy, begging her to let them slowly slip out of her mouth and fill the empty, quiet pocket of space. But her feet slowly trudged forward, seemingly unaware of the perilous dangers that could lurk inside the lighthouse.
Slowly breathing in the scent of salty, slightly musty air, Lily slowly crept forward, her hands instinctively reaching for the old, cobbled wall that stood on either side of her. Yet her hands connected with thin air, and her mind flashed to images of a churning, roaring sea down below, with needle sharp rocks jutting out like ruins. Eyes drooping slightly from the lack of sleep, she squinted, the flickering lights growing fainter and fainter as she hurried forward. Pausing briefly to catch breath, Lily slowly sank to her knees, coughing and gasping for air. The wind around her seemed to be closing in on her, and the air slowly grew thinner, as if she was sucking in air from a straw. The motion of breathing made her head spin from the nausea clotting in her stomach, but the dizzying feeling blinked away when a menacing growl pierced the silence.
Trembling with palpable fear, Lily slowly turned, her hazel eyes widening as they caught the gaze of the beast. Red eyes pierced her soul, as if sucking the strength and hope from her body and leaving a weak shell behind. With a shuddering breath, Lily slowly lifted herself up and forced herself to peer into the shadows. The red eyes never left her, slowly calculating her every move.
Stalking her.
The darkness seemed to close in suddenly, the red eyes vanishing as Lily gasped. Hyperaware, her heart pounded in her throat and her hands shook and – Lily forced herself to draw her thoughts from herself and focus on the eerie silence. The shadows swirled ominously, coalescing into something not even the worst nightmare could conjure. Pools of red drew her gaze in, and the world blurred and dipped as Lily fell to her knees. The inescapable nightmare. The hopeless feeling. Was this really what she had gotten herself into? For a bunch of flickering lights?
A sharp clatter forced her back to her bleak reality. Her glasses. Fumbling in the darkness, her hand caught on a sharp stone, and a deep gash tore her roseate skin. Lily gasped as the pain hit her, and when she kept on searching for her glasses, all she felt was something sticky, warm, and wet. Blood.
Her scream echoed off the cliffs as the shadows engulfed her, and for once, it was too much. Lily surrendered to the darkness.
And all that remained of her in the cold, harsh morning were her bloodstained glasses and a stain of red.
FEEDBACK
drradhikabhatla@gmail.com
Imagine coming across your whole entire childhood on social media, from your most embarrassing moments to your first steps or words. This isn’t an apocalyptic situation, it’s the truth for most kids around the world today. By the time the average child hits the age of five their parents have already posted thousands of photos of them online. But at what cost does this come in? The child has nothing to win but everything to lose.
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed members of society and influencers of the social media, thank you for the chance to allow me to express my thoughts on this topic.
First and foremost, from the beginning a child is born all his moves, steps and words ae recorded and posted straight onto dangerous social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook and the big one Tik Tok. But as we revel sharing the joys of our child’s development and their first steppingstones, we have to ask each other and ourselves is it worth it? Us as parents, well for me I always tell my kids to never post photos about themselves on the internet because of hackers and kidnappers. Now how is posting photos of them any different than them doing it themselves. Don’t we have to spread good examples to our kids for a better overall life. We as parents are being hypocrites telling our kids not to do something but then we go ahead and do it for them potentially placing them in the media, a world full of unknown hazards and people ready to strike when the time is right. We must vehemently not place photos or videos of our kids, for the sake of their safety and the potential possibility of danger in the midst.
Next, imagine building up a whole new ego making new friends which took years to create and bond a new friendship. Your life is amazing and nothing could have dimmed your mood. Except one thing. Your friends discover a hair-ripping embarrassing moment of you getting potty trained on the internet. You get laughed at, bullied because of what your parents posted about you ten years ago. Who knew how much internal damage that could have caused. Us parents don’t understand what our kids go through, to have friends and build relationships and bonding moments with other people. Why should we tear their hope into a million smithereens by posting stuff without their personal consent. Why don’t we just think about that.
Last but not least, this touchbases on autonomy and personal consent. Would you like if someone posted something on you without asking for permission or personal consent? I don’t think so, so why should we be able to do that? Afterall, kids are normal human beings with feelings that can be hurt, so I don’t understand why we think kids are just our little minions who will obey every order and agree to everything we do. I strongly believe if we must post anything of our child’s online, we most definitely ask for their personal consent before doing so.
Parents I understand the pride and happiness coming from sharing our child’s life online, but we must also recognise that with great pried comes great responsibility to respect their autonomy, their emotional-life and to protect their privacy.
Let us give our children the voice to have change on their digital lives and let us accept that they have the right to impact on what is posted about them. After all, their life is their future- not ours.
Thank you.
FEEDBACK
Diana D
Persuasive Writing : Imagine you are addressing a panel of parents and social media executives. Write a persuasive speech arguing for children’s right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. Use at least 8 vocabulary words from the list in your writing. (500 words)
Dear parents, social media executives, ladies and gentlemen,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak today on a matter that is both deeply personal and profoundly impactful: the rights of children in the realm of social media. As social media continues to intertwine with every tiny aspect of our lives, it has become very clear that the digital footprints of children are being shaped not only by their own actions but by the choices of their own parents. Today, I advocate for a fundamental right that will better balance this equation: the right for children to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. Imagine, if you will, a young child, their first steps captured in a video posted online by a well-meaning parent. To the parent, this is a milestone moment, a precious memory to share with friends and family. However, to the child, this post is more than just a cute memory; it is a permanent record of a private moment, shared without their consent. As children grow and their sense of self develops, they may come to view these posts differently. They may feel exposed, judged, or simply uncomfortable with the permanence of their early years being broadcasted online.
The digital age has given us unprecedented tools to document our lives, but it has also introduced new ethical dilemmas. As parents, we naturally want to celebrate our children’s achievements and share their growth with our social circles. Yet, we must also recognise that children are not mere extensions of ourselves but individuals with their own rights and boundaries. Granting children the right to veto their parents’ social media posts is not about stifling parental expression or curbing the joy of sharing milestones. Instead, it’s about respecting the autonomy and dignity of our children as they grow. It’s about recognising that their digital identities, once shaped, are difficult to alter. The ramifications of public posts—whether they are embarrassing, overly personal, or misinterpreted—can have lasting effects on a child’s mental and emotional well-being.
This right to veto does not mean children will necessarily exercise it at every opportunity. Children have the right to give consent before their parents post social media videos. Many may be perfectly fine with their parents’ choices, but some would express profound dissatisfaction with their online presence on social media platforms. However, by establishing this right, we must empower children to express their discomfort or concerns, fostering an environment of mutual respect and open communication. It also provides a valuable lesson in consent and digital responsibility. In practical terms, implementing this right can be achieved through a framework that ensures parents and children engage in meaningful dialogue about what is shared online. It could involve setting clear guidelines for when and how children can voice their objections and ensuring these decisions are respected. This approach allows for flexibility, understanding, and cooperation, ultimately leading to healthier relationships and more responsible social media practices.
Furthermore, this proposal aligns with broader societal values of consent and privacy. As we strive to protect individuals from unwarranted exposure and misuse of their online privacy, we must also extend this protection to children. Cyberbullying or internet safety can happen in this time period when other individuals can also see the child’s personal information and the child’s online reputation is ruined. They are digital citizens from birth, and their rights deserve to be safeguarded with the same seriousness we have applied to the adults.
In conclusion, the right for children to veto their parents’ social media posts is a necessary evolution in our approach to digital ethics. It is about acknowledging the complex dynamics of modern family life and ensuring that our children are respected as individuals with their own agency. By embracing this right, we affirm our commitment to their dignity and well-being, paving the way for a more empathetic and considerate digital culture.
Choose one of the following story starters and write a narrative. (500 words)
Olivia stood at the edge of the abandoned amusement park, the wind carrying whispers of a forgotten summer that never seemed to leave her mind. The skeletal remains of once-vibrant rides creaked and groaned in the breeze, their colours faded to muted shades of rust and grey. The Ferris wheel, a looming giant, stood frozen in time, its once-cheerful lights now mere ghosts of their former brilliance. Overgrown weeds and ivy tangled around the base, reclaiming the land in a slow but yet steady encroachment.
It had been years since she’d last set foot here, a place that had once been a playground of laughter and adventure. But now, as she walked along the cracked pavement, each step stirred up memories from a summer long past, a time when she and her friends had been invincible, when everything seemed possible. The park had closed abruptly after a series of accidents that summer, its gates rusted shut, its joy silenced. Olivia had been fifteen then, the age when everything seemed larger than life. She and her friends had spent countless afternoons here, exploring every corner, daring each other to climb the haunted roller coaster, or sneaking into the carousel’s once-glimmering centre. They had shared secrets, dreams, and endless laughter, a tapestry of youth that was now a distant memory.
She paused at the entrance to the old funhouse, its entrance a gaping maw of darkness. The mirrors inside had once warped reflections and offered distorted glimpses of the world, but now they were shattered and splintered. Olivia remembered how they had used the funhouse as a hideout, a place to escape from the world outside and lose themselves in the labyrinth of reflections. Taking a deep breath, she pushed open the creaky door and stepped inside. Dust motes danced in the weak light filtering through broken windows, casting ethereal patterns on the cracked floor. She moved slowly, her footsteps echoing in the emptiness, until she reached the centre of the funhouse.
In the dim light, she noticed a single, unbroken mirror still standing. Its glass was fogged and dusty, but as she wiped it with her sleeve, the reflection that emerged was not entirely her own. It was as if the mirror held a piece of the past within it. The image was of her and her friends, caught in mid-laughter, frozen in a moment of carefree joy. Olivia’s heart ached as she gazed at the reflection. She reached out a trembling hand to touch the glass, and for a fleeting moment, she felt as though she could reach through the mirror and pull her friends back to this place. But the moment passed, and the reflection remained just out of reach, a bittersweet reminder of what had been.
As she turned to leave, a sound caught her attention—a faint, melodic tune carried by the wind. It was the same tune that had once played from the old carousel, now strangely nostalgic amidst the desolation. She followed the sound, weaving her way through the derelict rides, until she found herself at the edge of the carousel, where an old, rusted organ stood. The tune was emanating from it, though it was clear the organ hadn’t played in years. Olivia approached it, her curiosity piqued. With a gentle touch, she brushed away the dust and saw a small, weathered box lying beside it. Inside were old photographs of her and her friends, along with a handwritten note. She picked it up and read:
“Sometimes, the places we loved hold pieces of our hearts long after we’ve left. Remember the joy, the laughter, and the dreams we shared. We’ll always be part of this place, just as it will always be part of us.”
Tears welled up in her eyes as she clutched the note. It was from Anna, her best friend from that summer, who had moved away before the park closed. The words were a reminder that while the park had been abandoned, the memories and friendships forged there were still alive, residing in her heart. As Olivia walked away from the park, she felt a sense of closure. The amusement park was no longer just a relic of the past but a cherished monument to a time of happiness and connection. The summer had ended, but its echoes would forever resonate within her. And as she left the park behind, she carried with her the bittersweet reminder that while some chapters close, the stories they hold continue to shape who we are.
Scholarship Interview Question : if you had one superpower you could wish for, what would it be? (500 words)
If I could choose a superpower, I’d select the ability to instantly understand and speak any language—whether human or animal. This power would transcend mere communication, opening doors to empathy, knowledge, and harmony in ways that currently seem out of reach. Imagine the possibilities: the world is a tapestry of diverse cultures, languages, and perspectives. With this superpower, I could bridge the gaps that often divide us. Conversations with people from different backgrounds would no longer be marred by misunderstandings or lost in translation. Political conflicts and diplomatic tensions, which often arise from miscommunication, could be mitigated by direct, clear dialogue. The nuances of each culture’s values, fears, and hopes could be comprehended fully, leading to more effective and compassionate solutions to global issues.
Furthermore, the ability to understand and speak any language would extend beyond human interactions. Picture being able to converse with animals—every pet, wild creature, and even the birds in the trees. This connection could transform our relationship with the natural world. Imagine asking a dog what it needs or how it feels, or understanding why a bird migrates in a particular pattern. It would deepen our awareness of animal welfare, leading to better conservation practices and more harmonious coexistence with nature. On a personal level, this power would enrich everyday experiences. It would allow me to engage with people from around the world in meaningful ways, appreciating the richness of their stories and perspectives. It would also enable me to participate in diverse cultural experiences fully, from savouring the true essence of a local tradition to understanding the subtleties of a foreign film or literature.
In conversations, this superpower would break down barriers that often hinder understanding. Misinterpretations of tone or intent could be avoided, fostering more genuine and empathetic interactions. The ability to ask questions and receive answers in any language would also provide endless opportunities for learning. The complexities of human experiences, histories, and philosophies could be explored in their original contexts, leading to a more nuanced and comprehensive view of the world. Additionally, this superpower could have profound implications for education and knowledge sharing. Imagine being able to instantly access and understand texts, research, and academic discourse from any language. This would democratise knowledge, making valuable information accessible to everyone, regardless of their linguistic background. Scholars and researchers could collaborate more effectively across borders, accelerating the pace of innovation and problem-solving.
Of course, there are ethical considerations to ponder. With such a power, one would need to exercise responsibility and respect for privacy. The ability to understand every conversation and read every text could lead to unintended breaches of trust. Ensuring that this superpower is used with integrity and respect for personal boundaries would be crucial. In real life, the ability to instantly understand and speak any language represents more than just a superpower; it symbolises the ultimate tool for bridging divides, fostering understanding, and nurturing empathy. It would create a world where communication flows seamlessly, where knowledge and experiences are shared freely, and where every voice, whether human or animal, is heard and understood.
FEEDBACK
Han Mu
Here’s my homework.
Scholarly Writing Week 7_
FEEDBACK
B H
Hello parents,
As we continue to navigate the complexities of the digital age, a crucial issue demands our attention: the right of children to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. I’m writing to underscore why this right is not only a matter of respect and privacy but also a necessary step toward fostering a more responsible and empathetic digital culture.
Children, much like adults, have the right to autonomy over their personal lives. In a world where every moment can be captured and shared instantly, respecting a child’s autonomy means acknowledging their right to control how their image and personal moments are portrayed online. Allowing children to veto posts about them empowers them with a sense of agency and self-respect, reinforcing their importance as individuals with their own rights and preferences.
The impact of online exposure on a child’s mental health cannot be understated. Public posts, even those shared with good intentions, can lead to unintended consequences like embarrassment, bullying, or anxiety. By giving children the ability to veto posts, we provide them with a tool to protect their emotional well-being and shield them from potential harm. This measure recognises the vulnerability of children and prioritises their mental health.
The permanence of the digital world means that once something is shared online, it can be difficult, if not impossible, to erase. Children, who may not fully understand the long-term implications of social media, should have the right to manage their digital footprints. Allowing them to veto posts ensures that their online presence aligns with their current and future preferences, protecting their future opportunities and personal image.
In conclusion, advocating for children’s right to veto their parents’ social media posts is about more than just privacy—it’s about respecting their autonomy, protecting their mental health, managing their digital footprints, and encouraging responsible digital behavior. By embracing this right, we take a significant step toward creating a more respectful and considerate digital environment for our children.
FEEDBACK
yuezhu-xuehotmail-com
Children’s Right to Veto Their Parents Social Media Posts Regarding Them
Distinguished parents and esteemed social media executives,
Pretend your digital footprint was carved in electronic stone, compromising an album of your humiliating childhood snapshots, influencing your job applications and even your social status. This is the merciless, cut-throat truth known as ‘sharenting’, the unjust power of parents to thoughtlessly jeopardise the fundamental right of privacy of many youths.
This clearly expresses that, to ensure the W.H.O. children’s right to privacy, it is essential to bestow the prerogative of proscription to all children, any social media post they wish not no be exposed to the public. This is not a move to stop paedocentric parents in their tracks, conversely, it is a strive to defuse shells of shame, and ensure a rudimentary right to be conferred to children
To start off, I must present the irreversible impacts of sharenting in the long run. Consider a child whose parents have posted an embarrassing picture of him in the age of two. In late primary and high school, he is liable to bullying and social exclusion. Some universities may reject his application due to this one photo, and this issue is highly likely to extend to the workplace, continuing this vicious spiral of disadvantage.
However, some may rebut by pointing out that these restrictions may impede on the parent’s right to post their own pictures of private life. However, the privacy of our younger generation is more valuable than the mere right of posting pictures of family. Additionally, it is not just outright banning – just make sure no mention of your child is posted without consent. Also, it is a valuable chance to enlighten your children with responsibility from their youth.
To sum up, the fundamental right to privacy in all children will be ensured in the digital era by bestowing the right to veto any social media post concerning them. It is about protecting the rights of a child and respecting their individual digital footprints. You can start now, allowing YOUR children to veto all social media posts regarding them, to prepare themselves for a digital society.
Thank you.
FEEDBACK
ran.d.f.chen
Sorry I realised I originally submitted this one in the wrong week’s page (Wk5 -26/8), so re-sending it now…
Ada Lovelace, great granddaughter of the distinguished mathematician, peered through her roseate tinted glasses at all of the plants that were kept in her fathers dilapidated greenhouse. It was a spectacular sight, with all the different shapes and sizes of the exquisite plants surrounding her. As she examined them closely, I realized that these plants have somehow grown all of a sudden. It couldn’t have been possible, unless they traveled forwards in time. The day before I experienced this, I overheard my father talking about some chrono-botanical plants that he had discovered. Out of the many greenhouses he had in our backyard, I had chosen to venture this one. She didn’t want to mess up anything, so she left, and tried to forget about it.
When she finally came back to these queer plants, she was certain about her theory. Actually, there were no plants at all. All that was left in the greenhouse were rows of her fathers superior pots lined up against the decayed walls, with nothing in them apart from some dirt, and seeds.
She had decided that this had already been an ambiguous day and it was time to take a break. As she walked, step by step, along the tidy pavers, she noticed that the enormous 100 year old tree, that has been at this house for generations, had weirdly gone back to a tiny sapling. To get that tall again, she would have to wait about another 100 years.
Ada Lovelace, great granddaughter of the distinguished mathematician, peered through her roseate tinted glasses at all of the plants that were kept in her fathers dilapidated greenhouse. It was a spectacular sight, with all the different shapes and sizes of the exquisite plants surrounding her. As she examined them closely, I realized that these plants have somehow grown all of a sudden. It couldn’t have been possible, unless they traveled forwards in time. The day before I experienced this, I overheard my father talking about some chrono-botanical plants that he had discovered. Out of the many greenhouses he had in our backyard, I had chosen to venture this one. She didn’t want to mess up anything, so she left, and tried to forget about it.
When she finally came back to these queer plants, she was certain about her theory. Actually, there were no plants at all. All that was left in the greenhouse were rows of her fathers superior pots lined up against the decayed walls, with nothing in them apart from some dirt, and seeds.
She had decided that this had already been an ambiguous day and it was time to take a break. As she walked, step by step, along the tidy pavers, she noticed that the enormous 100 year old tree, that has been at this house for generations, had weirdly gone back to a tiny sapling. To get that tall again, she would have to wait about another 100 years.
I will send this week’s work in a little while.
Thank you!
Kobe
FEEDBACK
Shane Chee
Should children be allowed to veto their parents’ posts about them?
Picture this, you walk into your job interview but when the interviewer looks at your family’s postings he sees a video of a six year old you throwing a tantrum and looks at you disapprovingly. This may sound ridiculous but this can actually happen. This just shows that children should be able to veto their parents’ posts on them. Here are some reasons to think this, children should have their own privacy, there may be future consequences and the digital footprint.
Firstly, children must definitely be allowed to veto their parents’ posts about them because they should be able to make their own decisions. What I mean by this is that children should have their own privacy and parents should be required to ask for their permission before they post pictures and videos about them. F or example, if a parent was to post a picture of their child being all covered in disgusting mud they should be required to ask their child for permission before doing so. By doing this it will reduce any resentment on the parents after they have posted it already and it states in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that every person has the right to make their own decisions and privacy . So it is clear to see that children must be able to reject their parents’ decision to post on them.
Secondly, children should a hundred percent be allowed to veto their parents’ social media posts on them because there may be future consequences. This is because in the future even just a video of a child crying because their lollipop fell on the floor which may seem hilarious at the time to the parents may seem very different to the child later. For example, bullies may use this video to aid them when they attack that child by showing it to them and making them embarrassed. In fact, in a recent study the researchers found out that eighty percent of children wished that their parents had not posted the picture or video on them. Now you know that children should surely be allowed to decline their parents’ wish to post videos or pictures on them.
Lastly, children must positively be allowed to veto the hour parents’ posts on them, as it will go on their digital footprint. This means that any post that their parents make will go on their history of all their digital technology. For example, a picture of a child biting their sibling will even go on their digital footprint and when they go for a job interview this may affect their probability of making the job. This is because if the interviewer sees the picture of the child biting their sibling they may think that the child is a rather rough and dangerous person to employ. That will make the child more likely to fail the interview. Many children have actually failed their interview because of social media posts about them made by their parents. Surely you now agree that children must have the ability to say no to their parents who want to post things about them.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that children must be allowed to veto their parents’ posts about them. There are many reasons for this. Children should be allowed to make their own decisions for their privacy. The posts will be very likely to affect their future. Everything their parents post will be on the child’s history. So think about what you think is the better option now, to let the parents continue to harmfully post on their child or to help the children have a better future by putting a stop to this! It is not possible that you do not now agree that children must be able to not allow their parents to post on them.
The letter
The last thing Sophia expected when she returned to her hometown was to find a letter from her younger self waiting on her doorstep. She had just gotten back from a three month holiday in England. Her hands were precipitating rapidly as she held the timeworn rough frayed letter in her hands. Sophia’s mind swirled in an endless vortex as she read the letter. It said that she had changed time years ago, except she could not remember doing so. How was it even possible that she had written herself that letter? Sophia read it over and over again but could not stop staring at the last phrase. The word before it had been cut off and a last small panicked phrase was splotched on the page. It said,’Help, pl-!’. The last horrifying thing about the letter was that her younger self had written the exact date and it said ‘3 November 1971’. That was forty years ago, when she had not even been born yet.
Sophia unlocked her creaking oak door with her key and walked in. She tried to blow away an insoluble cloud of dust. She was in deep thought as she sat down on the mouldy but comfortable couch. As she thought about the letter she twisted the paper in her hands. Suddenly as Sophia made a slight tear in the paper an amazing thing happened. The rip seemed to glow with a neon yellow tint and then it pulled her in. She felt herself being teleported to a different area. After a minute Sophia found herself sitting on the floor and she just sat there for a few seconds, staring in sublime astonishment. All around her she saw short red brick buildings and some odd looking cars. Just then Sophia heard some footsteps approaching from behind her. When she looked around, she saw something that made her gasp in shock. How was this possible?
There it was, the younger version of Sophia. Sophia gaped, mouth open, as her younger self approached. “You came!”her younger self said,”I didn’t really have a choice though”Sophia replied. “Well, why did you write to me asking for help?”She asked,”well you see I have changed too much of the time, you do remember doing this, right? If so, how did you fix the changes in time?” “Well you see, I don’t remember doing this”Sophia explained,“oh my gosh, I didn’t realise that it was this bad already!” Sophia could see the palpable trepidation in her younger self. What could have shaken her younger self that much?
Just then Sophia’s younger self said something very quietly,”we’d better get back to real time, did you bring your letter?” Sophia pulled the piece of paper out and saw that the edges were starting to fade into thin air. What was going on? She touched the tear in the letter and then both of them were pulled into the paper once more. A minute later they were both sitting on the couch in Sophia’s house. “Well what do we do n-“Sophia broke off and stared as her younger self faded. It was at that moment that she realised that something was not right. When she looked around she realised that her computer and car had disappeared and that there were no electricity wires anywhere . What was more was that she was starting to feel light headed and fatigued. Sophia realised that her younger self had changed time so much that it had had great consequences on the future. “Well”she thought,”my younger self was still part of me, so I would be the one to blame. The last thing she thought was,”if the whole world is changed because of me, then the one who changed it must be terminated”. Then she faded away and everything went back to normal except her.
If you had one superpower you could wish for, what would it be?
If I could have one superpower it would be the power to make sure that me and all my classmates would always be feeling positive. This would be useful to make sure that everyone is able to work at their full potential during class. If a student is feeling sad or frustrated this usually affects their classwork negatively and when this happens then they might not get as great marks as they would have wanted. This would also mean that the teacher would be able to teach most effectively without any problems of fights in the playground or anyone feeling too depressed. All this together creates an ideal classroom environment for learning. This includes all the students listening, the teacher teaching efficiently, no disruptions, no fights, no negative emotions, all students performing to their absolute potential and having fun. This is why I feel that, personally, if I could have any power I wished for it would be to be able to create an ideal classroom environment anytime of the day.
FEEDBACK
maggiesmchan
My homework:
Wk7 writing homework
FEEDBACK
Nandu
Scholarship Interview Question : If you had one superpower you could wish for, what would it be? (500 words)
If I could wish for one superpower, I’d choose the ability to resolve any type of conflict. Imagine how different the world would be if conflicts—whether global issues like poverty and hunger or everyday arguments—could be solved with a simple conversation that leads to real understanding. Take the severe issues of poverty and hunger, for example. In many African countries, around 72% of the population lives below the average wealth line, struggling just to get by. If I had the power to resolve conflicts, I’d start by addressing these life-threatening crises. I’d bring together world leaders, activists, and communities to come up with solutions that not only help immediately but also last in the long run. With this superpower, I could make sure that everyone has access to basic needs like food, clean water, education, and healthcare. The goal would be to empower communities to lift themselves out of poverty and create a better future for their children.
But this superpower wouldn’t just be about fixing global problems—it would work on a personal level too. Think about the conflicts we face in our daily lives: arguments with family, misunderstandings with friends, or tensions at work. These might seem small compared to global issues, but they can still have a big impact on our happiness and well-being. With the ability to resolve conflicts, I could help people see each other’s perspectives, find common ground, and come to agreements that make everyone feel heard and respected.
For example, a family feud that’s been dragging on for years could finally be put to rest with a conversation that reminds everyone of the love they share. In the workplace, where stress and competition can cause rifts, I could help create a more supportive and cooperative environment. Even friends who’ve drifted apart could reconnect, realising that their differences don’t have to keep them apart.
The real magic of this superpower would be in how it changes the way people think and act. By resolving conflicts, I wouldn’t just be solving problems—I’d be teaching people how to communicate better, how to listen, and how to care about each other’s feelings. Over time, this could lead to a world where conflict resolution is just a natural part of life. Instead of jumping to conclusions or holding grudges, people would approach disagreements with an open mind, ready to work things out together.
The impact of this power would be amazing. As more conflicts get resolved, people would start to work together more easily, and that cooperation would lead to all kinds of positive changes. Instead of wasting time and resources on fighting, we could focus on making progress—advancing technology, improving education, and taking care of our planet. When people are united, the possibilities are endless.
In this kind of world, peace wouldn’t just be a dream—it would be something we all experience every day. Wars could become a thing of the past, and social inequalities could start to fade away as we work together for fairness and justice. Even the little acts of kindness and cooperation would help build a global culture of peace.
So, if I had the power to resolve any conflict, I’d use it to create a world where understanding, empathy, and teamwork are what drive us forward. A world where people come together to solve problems, support each other, and build a future that’s bright for everyone. That’s the superpower I’d wish for, and that’s the world I’d want to help create. With this power, peace and kindness could become the standard, and we could finally see a world where people work together instead of against each other.
W7 Persuasive Writing HW
In today’s digital world, the lines between private and public life are increasingly blurred, especially for children . Parents often share moments of their children’s lives on social media, raising the question: should children have the right to veto these posts? The answer is a clear yes. Giving children the power to say no to their parents’ social media posts is about respecting their privacy, recognizing their independence, and protecting their mental well-being.
First and foremost, children have a right to privacy that should be respected by their parents. This right extends to the digital world, where a child’s life can be shared with a wide audience without their approval. When parents post about their children online, they create a digital footprint that the child has no control over. This can affect how the child is seen by friends, teachers, and even future employers. Allowing children to veto these posts helps protect their right to control their own image and how they are presented to the world.
Additionally, the impact of sharing personal moments online can be significant on a child’s mental health. Kids are still figuring out who they are, and having their lives broadcasted online can make them feel embarrassed or insecure. What might seem like a harmless post today could lead to long-lasting issues with self-esteem. Giving children the ability to veto posts ensures that their feelings are considered and helps prevent potential harm.
Consent is another important issue. Teaching children about consent is crucial as it helps them understand that they have control over their own lives and bodies. By letting them veto social media posts, we are reinforcing the importance of consent and allowing them to have a say in their digital presence.
Furthermore, this right can improve the relationship between parents and children. When children know their parents will respect their wishes about what is shared online, it can build trust and strengthen their bond. This open communication can lead to more positive and supportive relationships within the family.
Social media platforms also have a role to play. By adding features that let children veto or control posts about them, these platforms can show they are committed to ethical practices and responsible use. This would protect children and encourage parents to think more carefully about what they share online.
In conclusion, giving children the right to veto their parents’ social media posts is crucial for respecting their privacy, independence, and mental health. It helps protect their digital identity and reinforces the importance of consent and communication in families. As we navigate the challenges of the digital age, it’s essential to prioritise the rights and needs of our children, ensuring they are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve.
W7 Narrative
1. Olivia stood at the edge of the abandoned amusement park, the wind carrying whispers of a forgotten summer that never seemed to leave her mind. The entrance gate, twisted with vines, groaned as Olivia pushed it open. The once vibrant colours of the amusement park had faded into shades of grey, but she could still make out the shapes of the rides she used to love. The carousel, now a skeletal ghost, stood silent in the middle of the park, its once bright horses now dull and lifeless, their eyes eerily following her every move.
As she walked deeper into the park, the wind seemed to carry faint echoes of laughter and the distant, haunting melody of a music box. Olivia’s heart tightened, memories rushing back in a wave that almost knocked her off her feet. She remembered running through these very paths, her fingers sticky with cotton candy, her heart light with the carefree joy of childhood. But something darker had always lurked at the edges of those memories, something she had pushed away—until now.
Her gaze landed on the old funhouse, the entrance looming like a black hole, sucking in what little light remained. The doors hung open, beckoning her inside. She hesitated, the air around her growing thick and cold. But the whispers—so many whispers—urged her forward.
As she stepped inside, the funhouse mirrors reflected not just her own image but those of ghostly figures from her past. Their eyes were hollow, their smiles twisted in mockery. “Remember us,” they seemed to say. Her reflection morphed, her face becoming younger, her eyes wide with the terror she had buried deep within. She turned to flee, but the exit had disappeared. The walls closed in, the whispers now a cacophony in her ears, drowning out her screams.
2. Mia knew something was off the moment she walked into her new apartment—the furniture wasn’t arranged how she had left it. She froze in the doorway, her eyes scanning the room. The air felt wrong, thick with an unseen presence that sent chills racing down her spine. The couch was angled oddly, like it had been hurriedly shoved aside. The coffee table, once centred perfectly on the rug, was askew, and the magazines she’d stacked neatly were now scattered as if someone had rifled through them.
Mia’s heart pounded in her chest as she slowly stepped inside, the floorboards creaking ominously beneath her feet. The familiar comfort of her home was now a twisted, unsettling landscape. She noticed small details—her favourite mug, usually on the kitchen counter, was now on the windowsill; the curtains were drawn when she always left them open.
She moved towards the bedroom, dread tightening its grip around her throat. The door was ajar, a sliver of darkness spilling into the hallway. She pushed it open with a trembling hand. The room was just as she had left it—except for the wardrobe. The door, which had been shut, now gaped open, revealing the darkness inside.
“Mia…” The whisper sent a jolt of terror through her. She spun around, her eyes wide, but the room was empty. Her breath came in short gasps as she backed away, her mind racing. Had she imagined it? But then she saw it—the mirror on the wall, where her reflection should have been, now showed another figure standing behind her. A figure with eyes that gleamed in the darkness, a twisted smile curling its lips. She screamed, but no sound came out, and the figure lunged.
3. When Lily saw the flickering lights in the distance, she knew the rumours about the old lighthouse weren’t just stories. The lighthouse stood like a sentinel at the edge of the cliffs, its light cutting through the swirling fog that clung to the coastline like a shroud. Lily gripped the steering wheel, her eyes fixed on the pulsing beam that illuminated the jagged rocks below. The stories she had heard—of shipwrecks, of ghostly apparitions, of a lighthouse keeper who refused to leave even in death—rushed through her mind, each one more chilling than the last.
But she had to know the truth.
She parked the car and stepped out, the wind howling around her, carrying the salty tang of the sea. The path to the lighthouse was narrow and treacherous, the ground slick with moss and rain. With each step, the beam of light seemed to grow stronger, more urgent, as if it were calling to her.
When she finally reached the lighthouse, she hesitated, her hand hovering over the rusted handle of the door. The tales of the keeper’s ghost, still guiding lost souls to safety, echoed in her mind. Taking a deep breath, she pushed the door open.
The interior was dim, lit only by the intermittent flash of the beacon above. The air was damp, thick with the scent of seawater and decay. As she climbed the spiral staircase, her footsteps echoed eerily in the confined space. The walls seemed to close in around her, and with each step, the temperature dropped.
At the top, she found herself in the lantern room. The light flickered and then dimmed, leaving her in near darkness. She felt a presence behind her—cold, malevolent. Slowly, she turned, and there he was—the keeper, his eyes glowing with an unnatural light, his face twisted into a grotesque smile. “Welcome,” he whispered, his voice like the wind, “I’ve been waiting for you.”
4. Ethan never believed in ghosts until the night he heard someone call his name from the empty room upstairs. The house was ancient, its walls steeped in the stories of generations long gone. Ethan had dismissed the eerie creaks and groans as just the house settling, its old bones shifting in the night. But this—this was different. He had been alone in the living room, the only sound the crackling of the fire, when he heard it. “Ethan…”
The voice was soft, almost a sigh, but it sent a chill down his spine. He looked around, half-expecting to see someone standing in the shadows. But there was no one. His heart pounded in his chest, and he tried to shake off the feeling of unease that was rapidly growing.
“Ethan…” The voice called again, this time from the room upstairs. A cold sweat broke out on his forehead. The room had been empty for years, ever since his grandmother had passed away. The door had remained shut, untouched, as if time itself had forgotten it existed.
Gathering his courage, Ethan grabbed the flashlight from the table and slowly made his way up the creaky staircase. Each step echoed ominously, the shadows on the walls seeming to dance and flicker as if something unseen moved within them.
When he reached the door, he hesitated, his hand trembling as he reached for the handle. Slowly, he pushed it open. The room was just as he remembered it—faded floral wallpaper, an old rocking chair in the corner, and the heavy scent of lavender that lingered in the air.
The flashlight flickered, and in its brief moments of light, he saw her—his grandmother, sitting in the rocking chair, her eyes fixed on him. But something was wrong. Her face was pale, almost translucent, her eyes hollow and filled with a sorrow that pierced his soul. “Ethan…” she whispered, her voice filled with an otherworldly echo. The chair creaked as it began to rock on its own, the rhythm slow and methodical. He stepped back, heart racing, as the door behind him slammed shut.
FEEDBACK
Ella Yang
Look into the internet. Many insensitive digital citizens leave digital footprints on social media, posting about how cute their newborn is. People nowadays look into that and laugh. But hey, would YOU like to recorded the moment you made your first step? Well that’s the reality for the majority of children. For some children, the moment their born is documented on social media platforms. Think of how embarrassing it would be if some random stranger shows you an absolutely humiliating recording of you? Every, every single person in the world should have privacy, consent and right to have power over what their parents post about them online.
Let me explain why.
Firstly, privacy is literally built into a human. It’s like thinking, if you were going to the restrooms and someone was trying to record you. You wouldn’t be given privacy, and that’s the exact same with countless younger children!
Oversharing parents leave digital footprints on the internet, posting about their children, unaware that the future of their child may be voluminously altered by them.
Say that you were born 20 years ago, and your parents recorded EVERY single moment of your life. So, now you are 20 years old, and you’re finding a job. You prepare for hours, days, months, seasons, years, only to go ahead of time and find out that you will lose to a idiotic reason. Once you submit your resume, you take the interview, and at the last minute of your successful interview, the interviewer shows you embarrassing videos of your carefree childhood…
“Hmm looks like you were a troublemaker when you were little, I’m not gonna let you get our job.” The interviewer says.
If, and only if, your unthinking parents actually didn’t post about you, if they didn’t, think of how successful you will be.
Also, online presences which have malicious intentions may steal and share your information.
See HOW much the future may change with and without privacy?
Secondly, imagine creating a wonderful life, where you and your friends play and chat where NOTHING could muck up… until friends and bullies uncover humiliating videos of your childhood. You get bullied and laughed at by your friends. Picture the humiliation, the shame, the embarrassment. It’s the same thing many children nowadays experience. That’s how childhoods without privacy may be extremely awful for some kids.
Finally, according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 16, :No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation.
The child must have online privacy due to many harmful online entities, over sharers, cyberbullies and many others
too. But of course it’s okay to share with private numbers, accounts that won’t be unearth to the general public.
In conclusion, the right for children to veto their parents’ social media posts is essential for acknowledging the rights of children’s privacy and need to receive consent from children.
By achieving this checkpoint, we will build a safe and reliable world.
This is my correct text 🙂
FEEDBACK
_Kyan Zhuan
Here’s my H/w
Week 7
FEEDBACK
liuyin_ozhotmail-com 2
Week 7 Writing
In the modern world, technology is ascending and probably reaching its peak, meaning that action on social media is inclining, especially with children and their parents. Now that parents frequently share pictures and snapshots of their children online for all to see, a discussion has commenced about a child’s privacy and how that can be maintained, as well as their own consent to things. Wading deeper into this controversial topic of sharenting and the potential dangers, while parents may think a picture of their little child in the middle of a tantrum would be quite cute, later in life, similar opinions wouldn’t be applied. Children need to understand privacy and how to deal with such a vital thing, future consequences of a eternal stain in the digital world, and the importance of giving our children a say in their online persona and character.
You can delete a post, but that picture will be never permanently removed from everyone’s devices. Even the most humiliating moments of a child’s life may be documented online, posted, shared, saved in hundred’s of people’s photo albums. It is a unerasable footprint on social media which often gets out of control of the uploader. It can be seen by vicious bullies or even affect future job opportunities. Is it fair to impact a child’s life, career and schooling experience like this?
Parents may think that sharing personal pictures or videos with others online is appealing and fun, but the impact on children is obvious. Constantly documenting the child’s lives will cause the children to be pressured to live up to that internet personality that was created, seeming like their real selves aren’t good enough, which leads to an overload of emotional stress and damage to overall well-being. Their childhood will be purely attempting to be better, unsatisfied with their current, actual personality.
According to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of a Child, one article states that “no child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy…” which means that they should be able have control of what their parents post online. However, are we really following this rule? By giving children veto power we will not be adapting this rule to the modern era, but instead, following it correctly without going into loopholes.
Implementing veto rights doesn’t necessarily result in no more sharenting on social media. It teaches children the importance of privacy and how you can protect that. Although some may argue that children are much too immature for these serious things, it prepares them for the digital world they will one day inherit, and by doing this from a young age, children will develop better critical thinking, make better decisions on social media platforms and result in a safer society for all.
FEEDBACK
Olivia Chen
Homework:
Persuasive writing:
Imagine you are addressing a panel of parents and social media executives. Write a persuasive speech arguing for children’s right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. Use at least 8 vocabulary words from the list in your writing. (500 words)
Choose one of the following story starters and write a narrative. (500 words):
1. Olivia stood at the edge of the abandoned amusement park, the wind carrying whispers of a forgotten summer that never seemed to leave her mind.
2. As Marcus opened the old leather-bound journal, he was startled to see his name scribbled across the first page in a handwriting that wasn’t his own.
3. Emma’s heart raced as the train pulled away from the station, leaving behind everything she had ever known.
4. The package arrived for Jason with no return address, but inside was something he had lost fifteen years ago.
5. Mia knew something was off the moment she walked into her new apartment—the furniture wasn’t arranged how she had left it.
6. Standing in front of the crowd, Daniel adjusted the microphone nervously, unaware that this speech would change the course of his life forever.
7. When Lily saw the flickering lights in the distance, she knew the rumours about the old lighthouse weren’t just stories.
8. The last thing Sophia expected when she returned to her hometown was to find a letter from her younger self waiting on her doorstep.
9. Ethan never believed in ghosts until the night he heard someone call his name from the empty room upstairs.
10. As the plane took off, Ava looked out the window, knowing this wasn’t just any flight—it was her last chance at freedom.
Interview question:
If you had one superpower you could wish for, what would it be? (500 words)
HOMEWORK IS FURTHER DOWN, SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE
Persuasive writing homework:
You protect your children from information being shared with strangers, from medical records to personal information. Why stop there? Sharing information online is the same as sharing all your personal information to random people online. It can damage people’s wellbeing, the feel of being safe, you stop your children from feeling happiness and joy because everything that happens in their life is shared a million times throughout the internet. Which can lead to hazards and pervasive dangers that no one can explain.
Imagine this, your out in the sunshine having a beautiful time at the park. When you get home you go onto Facebook and see your exact day happening before your eyes. This is what happens to everyone. Parents think it’s harmless whereas it isn’t. People should have the right to have privacy and not be videoed everywhere they go, you must be given consent by the person you’re posting about otherwise it’s just wrong. Just like an article on the UN Convention website says that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” This just states that no one should have the need to feel unsafe, and feel like there videoed everywhere they go, because that is just wrong and an invasion of their privacy.
Parents think that sending images or videos of their kids doing silly things and having fun is just harmless, when really, it’s just wrong and can lead to many dangers. Parents could be unknowing and not realising the dangers they put their children in while posting images about them. Pervasive dangers are one of the biggest things you must worry about while on the internet. It can lead to identity theft and photos that can be manipulated by pernicious hackers. Before you realise it, it’s too late. These dangers are exactly what you would worry about if videos about you are sent online. It can ruin your self-esteem and make you worry about other things. These are only just some of the bad results you get when parents think that they have the right to post things about you online.
Have you ever heard the saying, “The internet is a permanent digital footprint that can’t be erased.”? If you ever thought that that wasn’t true, then I’m here to tell you that it is true. Once something is posted on the internet, something personal maybe, then you can’t delete it. It will stay there forever, because the internet never forgets. Don’t post things if you would later, want it deleted. Posting things online about someone can make them feel embarrassed, humiliated, disgrace, maybe even shame. It can lead to cyberbullying, which is not nice and can affect people’s well-being. If someone ever posts something about you that you don’t like, tell them to stop, tell them it’s your right to post things about yourself and what they did was wrong and an invasion of their privacy. Tell them, “NO!” and that they need to stop.
By giving people, the chance to post what they want about whoever is wrong. Especially when parents post things about there kids because parents know everything about their children. You must let people give consent about what to post about themselves and make sure there okay with it. If we don’t stop sending things about people that they don’t want to be posted, then many other hazards and disasters can result from that. That’s why we need to stop.
MORE HOMEWORK IS FURTHER DOWN, SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE
Story starters/narratives homework:
Story starter = As the plane took off, Ava looked out the window, knowing this wasn’t just any flight—it was her last chance at freedom.
AVA = ME or I
I ran towards the boarding station in a hurry, “5 minutes left until plane 2760 boards to Japan.”
“Oh no.” I thought. “I was running out of time.” This is my last chance for freedom, before my life will change forever. I could see the station up ahead, I looked down at my watch, 2 minutes left. “Will I make it?” I asked myself. One minute left. I reached for the handle of the door, “I made it.” I thought. When suddenly I heard a voice, screaming at me, “Ava, stop!” It was my mum. “You don’t know what you’re doing, come back her,”
“No mum, no one, not even you can make me get off this plane.” I said, staring back into her eyes, for the last time. “Goodbye, and good luck without me.” I turned around and closed the door behind me. My mum staring at me as tears rolled down her eyes. “Good luck Ava, you’ll need it.” She whispered quietly to herself.
As I got onto the plane, I thought to myself. “Am I doing the right thing? Should I turn back?” I looked back towards the door, the door was closed shut and the plane had started to take off, it was too late now, I’m on my own now. As I found my seat, we started to get higher and higher into the sky. As I looked out the window, I knew that this wasn’t just any flight – it would be the flight that would give me my last chance of freedom.
A few hours later, the plane started to slow down and then it stopped. The speaker on the roof of the plane said. “We have arrived in Japan, please take any of your belongings and exit through the door at the front. Thank you for flying with China airlines, hope you enjoyed the flight.” I looked out the window. My journey for freedom, starts here.
As I erupted out of the airport, I suddenly realised that I had nowhere to go. I took out my phone a searched for hotels nearby. I looked in my backpack to see how much money I had, and my findings weren’t good. I found $30.67 and a few breaths mints and some coins but in a different currency. I could probably buy a 2-night stay at a hotel, but then I won’t have any money for food and other things. So, I decided first I’d have to find a way to make some money. I looked in my bag again for anything and I found an old small toy xylophone. It was one of those small ones you’d find in a toy store. Suddenly an idea came rushing into me. “Maybe I could play something and try to earn some money.” I thought.
Then I found a bench outside a store and sat down and started playing. I played a song that reminded me of home, and of my favourite role model, ( Taylor Swift ) that I could remember. I played Shake it off. As I started to play, some people came up to me and threw me some coins and started to watch. Suddenly for the first time in a while I felt free from all my worries, and I was happy. Soon more people came to watch and soon a whole crowd was there before my eyes. I t was the best time ever, and I felt freer than ever.
MORE HOMEWORK IS FURTHER DOWN, SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE
Interview question:
If I could choose to have one superpower, I would choose to have the power to bend water, which is the power known as aquamancy. I would choose this power because if I were able to bend water then I could help save millions of people from dying by tsunamis or waves drifting people of to sea. I could help bend the water to instead of making it drift people of to sea then I could make the water carry them back rather then away. This power could impact and help many people and prevent many disasters from happening.
FEEDBACK
Annabelle Tung
Scholarly Writing Week 7 Persuasive Text
Imagine a world where everyone has the right to see and share what they want to see about themselves. This is a fundamental human right that everyone deserves to appreciate. However this is the problem, many parents post things on social media platforms about their children and this can have an everlasting impact on a child’s life. From the start of a child’s life, their lives are documented in photos, videos, and posts on platforms that will outlast most of the devices we use to access them. But as we indulge in these hilarious images, do we respect the children’s privacy and autonomy?
In a world where the rise of technology is shaping our world, the images and videos parents post will have a perpetual impact for these formative years for children. While these images of a kid throwing a tantrum it may have a enjoyable short term benefit but if we look into the long run what damage will it have, from ammunition for classmates to bully them, to a potential employer digging up old posts, the consequences of these digital imprints are serious and far-reaching. The internet doesn’t forget, and once these posts are out there, they are virtually impossible to retract. And yet, we often overlook the fact that the very subjects of these posts—the children themselves—rarely, if ever, have a say in the matter.
Why do children deserve the right to veto their parents’ posts about them? Because they, too, are individuals with rights to privacy, dignity, and autonomy. Just as adults would not want embarrassing or deeply personal moments shared without their consent, children should be afforded the same respect. Parents may argue that they post with good intentions, or that they are documenting precious memories. But there is a difference between cherishing a moment privately and broadcasting it to an audience of thousands, even millions, without considering how the subject of that post might feel now—or in the future.
We live in a world where we talk about consent in many aspects of life. We teach our children that their bodies, their thoughts, and their feelings are their own, and that they have the right to say “no” when their boundaries are crossed. So why should the digital world be any different? When parents post about their children, they are curating a digital identity on their behalf—one the child didn’t choose and can’t easily escape. Children deserve the power to veto posts about themselves because it empowers them to shape their own narrative, to protect their own future from the unintended consequences of oversharing.
Ultimately, as the UN convention states in article 16 No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation. This means that no child can have their privacy shared without consent. However, giving children the ability to veto what their parents share online will have long lasting effects on their lives even if it’s from preventing bullying or even getting a job.
FEEDBACK
Phuong Nguyen
My HW
Scholarly W7 HW
FEEDBACK
Ting Zhang
Here is my writing.
I did the interview question and the exposition
Week 7 Term 3 Writing
FEEDBACK
Damon Yuan
Writing Homework
Scholarly W7
FEEDBACK
oliverzhang
Hello, I have attached my writing homework for week 7. Thank you.
Xiaoyuan Huang
Y5T3 Week 7 Zoom Scholarship Writing Homework_Xiaoyuan Huang
FEEDBACK
pathuang@hotmail.com
Imagine you are addressing a panel of parents and social media executives. Write a persuasive speech arguing for children’s right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them. Use at least 8 vocabulary words from the list in your writing.
Imagine feeling unsafe in public because pictures of you have been posted online for everyone to see? They may be funny photos that people will laugh at, or there may be silly ones that will make you look stupid. That is why children should have rights to veto their parents’ social media posts about them for these two reasons, privacy of the child, and because of the digital footprint.
You walk down the footpath and hear society gossiping about you. You hear some whispers that you are the ‘weird kid’ and ‘that’s him’. That is why it is crucial that children should have the right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them because of privacy. Imagine your parents posting a stupid picture of you online, and people teasing you at school because of what your parents sent. Parents can still post pictures of their child online, but the child has to give them permission.You walk down the footpath and hear society gossiping about you. You hear some whispers that you are the ‘weird kid’ and ‘that’s him’.
Secondly, it is vitally important that children should have the right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them because of the digital footprint.when something is posted online, it is quite difficult to delete. The digital footprint is when something is sent online, everyone starts hearing about it and it spreads and now everyone in society knows about it. For example, If your parents send a photo of you doing a silly dance which you find foolish and stupid, you would evidently not want it to be shown. But now that your parents have sent it, it is now very hard for them to get it off. A second later, 78.3% of the population have probably seen it. Soon, everyone will know about it.
To conclude, it is imperative that children should have the right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them because of privacy, and the digital footprint. If you’re a child who doesn’t like your parents sending photos online, stand up and tell them that you don’t give them permission to. That is why I believe that children should have the right to veto their parents’ social media posts about them.
FEEDBACK
Shane Chee (1)
Children’s Rights about Parents Posting Pictures on Social Media
Envision a world where every moment of your lives is leaked to everyone. You may not think that is true, right? Wrong, parents think that posting pictures of their children without permission is harmless. They do not know of how colossal of an affect it can have on their lives. The child might not feel secure with their parents, resulting in depression. They could get anxious if the wrong person views it. Furthermore, the child might feel as if he or she has no rights or privacy. Bullies get attracted to these photos like magnets. When the child grows up and has an interview for a job and see photos of you furious or vexed, they will probably think that the grown up child has no control over their emotions and much more. Also, hackers might sell these photos, which is extremely disgraceful.
Have you ever got bullied? If you have, you would know agonizing it would be and how every day, when you are about to go to school, you have butterflies in your belly and plead to your parents to not got to school. If these online photos are ever perceived by a diabolic bully, they could confer the children in the photos an unpleasant nickname. Thus, striking the child’s heart like a sharp weapon. Unfortunately, some children who get really annoyed from the vicious bully, do suicide. There have been many cases of this happening all around the world. To stop this, parents must only post pictures, when the person in the photo allows them to.
After primary school, middle school, high school, college and university, it is essential that every child finds a job. Even though, these cringe photos are years and years behind you, it can still emerge in an interview. If they see you doing childish stuff at an older age or discover that the child with leaked pictures from the past cannot control their emotions or is very idle, they might not get selected for the career. Hence, children should have rights about what their parents post about them or else, they will definitely get struck by consequences.
Another major problem are wicked hackers. If devious hackers ever uncover these pictures, he or she can find bits of the family’s location form the backgrounds. They can feed the world information about your house and where it is. Also, with your photos, hackers can print them and sell them. This means people can have the child’s personal photos without any permission. How would you feel if this ver happened to you? I would be a ticking time bomb. This is why, I believe that it is crucial that children get to choose whether their parents can send certain posts to social media.
In conclusion, I would like to say that should not ever send pictures of their children to social media or fans. A hacker or bully could be among the “fans”. Also, if the child gets angry that his or her parents posted something that they never gave authorisation, it could tear apart the family like delicate paper. Photos may not look like a threat but when it is revealed to the wrong people, it can cause enormous damage to the child (and occasionally parents) reputation(s). Hence, children should decide what photos go to social media and what stay private.
FEEDBACK
Bhupender _
Imagine you’re in a world where all your sensitive information – from your first step to your first day at school – is released into the internet, and it’s already too late by the time you find out. This may look like a dystopian world, but sadly it is the status quo of many children worldwide. How would you feel if all your embarrassing moments were documented? And when you throw a tantrum it is immediately uploaded to social media? How would you feel, huh? Not good. It is clear that our children deserve the right to veto the posts that are shared about them. This doesn’t mean you can’t record them and you permanently can’t post images, it means that they must give you consent to upload their information not just blindly send it. Allow me to elaborate.
First and foremost, posting children’s sensitive information is a major violation of their privacy – a literal human right. Detailed in Article 16 – where we cannot make attacks on their honour and reputation – posting purposely their ’embarrassing’ videos as a light joke may not be so funny for them. This could also cause major problems later on in their life as these moments could be used as ammunition for bullies and harm their reputation which has its own detrimental effects. Don’t you think it would be disrespectful and odd if you’re having a restroom break or a light snack and someone just starts videoing you?
Not only that but, as you know, people require a specific affirmation named: consent. If you start recording someone in public, it is clear that you need their consent to do that and to post it online. This doesn’t stop you from taking notes of important times in their lives, but it does imply that you cannot post those until your child allows you. Technically, since the main subject of the video is them, they should have a right to that video. This would also violate their digital autonomy and thus pave paths for cyberbullying and other pernicious attacks. Picture that you’re having a job interview for something that you’re passionate about and have trained for your whole life just to get denied because you used to be a troublemaker and messy individual as an infant. Maybe the world would be better if parents just took a digital detox from uploading information about their child.
Lastly, this shameful content could deplete a child’s self-esteem and might result in many mental health issues; especially as they advance into their adolescent years. In their teenage times, when social anxiety and reputational stress bloom, this information can be extremely private for them and for it to just be released into the public would do far more harm than good. This, for many, could cause high levels of anxiety, stress and potentially even symptoms of depression at such an important time. Additionally, high school is a place of extreme importance among students as their final score – the HSC – would define the course of their lives, and it is also where bullies dwell in the most. All this pressure, academically, socially, online, and everywhere can be crushing for a blossoming teenager.
In culmination, parents shouldn’t post information about their child. Sure it might get a few laughs at first, but the information could be unfathomably valuable or private for the individual. And consequently, they deserve a right to veto and stop the flow of their lives being released in the digital age. By acquiring and sustaining this checkpoint, we can shape our world for the better
FEEDBACK
Benjamin Yang
When Lily saw the flickering lights in the distance, she knew the rumours about the old lighthouse weren’t just stories. They were real. She was sure about that. It wasn’t just a myth. It is read and genuine. If only she didn’t randomly sneak in and explore, if only she had had obeyed her mom, she wouldn’t be here hanging for her life.
It was the end of the school day and crowds of commuters and school children flock the streets and cars occasionally zoom by. The air was full of the humid air of summer while the whitish-golden ball of light started to sink into the azure horizon. A serpentine concrete path spiralled around the city. The fumes of death gyrated around her and wafted into the stale polluted air.
Amidst the frenzied crowd, Lily dashed towards the beach that had been closed for many years. Escaping the chaos, she headed towards the rusted fence rusted and unoiled for more than a decade. She had only been here once as a baby, the day the lighthouse set on fire. She leapt over the fence and fell face-flat on the grimy sand. Seaweeds wrapped around a tall structure of steel. The tall, deteriorated building towered leaned over the rocky shore, peering drearily at the barricaded cliff’s edge. Sitting on the precipice of the cliff, the faded helter-skelter pattern begged for mercy from the merciless sun and gales. Huge waves washed up dead fish and algae. Despite the constant lapping of salty water, it still had a charred scent of death.
Lily had lost her father on this beach. She couldn’t remember him but she knew that her father burnt to death in this one building. She still can’t visualise her father but she could clearly remember that fateful day. People ran from the sparks and dived into the water. It was clear but that was all she remembered.
Since then, there have been lights shining out of the lighthouse during midnight. Everyone thought that there was someone inside but no one dared to trespass the lighthouse. Only Lily knew that something even more sinister hides inside.
Curious and interested, Lily walked slowly into the degraded structure without flinching. She looked over her shoulders to clear her surroundings. Nothing obstructed her. Everyone else thought it was an accident. However, it was arson. She then recalled the moment the lighthouse busted into flames. However, she saw a hooded figure sneak into the lighthouse. One holding a flaming match and a cigarette lighter. It slid behind the door and…
She had forgotten the rest. Lily shook her head, regained her balance and tiptoed up the stairs. As she did, a blinding flash filled the dim, narrow room. She jerked back, expecting a person striding down the steps. Something did trudge down but it didn’t look human. It was a large biped monster with its arms dangling from its sockets. The head was a blob of black and had an amorphous body. A moment of darkness and searing pain followed…
Why children should be allowed to stop their parents posting social media about them
FEEDBACK
tracyz0104@gmail.com
My Homework 🙂
Scholarly Week 7 Writing Homework
FEEDBACK
Tina205
interview
My superpower
FEEDBACK
tracyz0104@gmail.com (1)